Advanced Search

The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, VOL. 19, No. 3

REGULAR | June 01, 2007

Reciprocal Effects of Antidepressant Treatment on Activity and Connectivity of the Mood Regulating Circuit: An fMRI Study

Amit Anand; Yu Li; Yang Wang; Kathryn Gardner; Mark J. Lowe

The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2007;19:274-282.

View Article Information

Received April 28, 2006; revised June 19, 2006; accepted July 4, 2006. Drs. Anand and Li and Ms. Gardner are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Drs. Anand and Wang are affiliated with the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Dr. Lowe is affiliated with the Division of Radiology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Indianapolis, Indiana. Address correspondence to Dr. Anand, Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic, University Hospital Suite #3124, 550 North University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202; aanand@iupui.edu (e-mail).

text A A A

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that one of the effects of antidepressants is to increase functional connectivity between the cortical mood-regulating and the limbic mood-generating regions. One consequence of this antidepressant effect is thought to be decreased limbic activation in response to negative emotional stimuli. Twelve unmedicated unipolar depressed patients and 11 closely matched healthy comparison subjects completed two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning sessions at baseline and after 6 weeks. Depressed patients received treatment with sertraline between the two sessions. During each MRI session, subjects completed a resting state functional connectivity scan and a conventional block-design negative vs. neutral pictures regional brain activation scan. After 6 weeks of sertraline treatment resting state, functional connectivity between the ACC and limbic regions increased while limbic activation in response to negative versus neutral pictures decreased. The results of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that antidepressant treatment has reciprocal effects on corticolimbic functional connectivity and limbic activation in response to emotional stimuli.

Figures in this Article

Recent neuroscience research has provided great insights into the mechanisms of antidepressants. Most antidepressants seem to work by inhibiting uptake of the monoamines—serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine, and/or dopamine—thereby increasing their synaptic availability. However, the neurophysiological correlates of these neurochemical effects on the brain’s mood regulating circuit¹ are not well understood.²

Functional MRI (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies have reported decreased function of the cortical mood regulating regions, such as the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC)³—⁵ and increased limbic (in particular amygdala) metabolism and activation in depression.⁴,⁶—⁹ In light of the reciprocal relationship between cortical and limbic function in depression, it has been proposed that corticolimbic connectivity abnormalities may be present in depression, and recent reports of corticolimbic functional connectivity in depression lend support to this hypothesis.²,¹⁰

Brain imaging studies have shown that antidepressant treatment may reverse the pattern of activation and connectivity abnormalities seen in depression. Antidepressants have been shown to decrease limbic activation in response to negative stimuli and to increase corticolimbic connectivity.²,⁸,¹¹—¹³ These findings have led to the hypothesis that antidepressants may restore the integrity of the corticolimbic mood regulating circuit,¹⁴ and thereby restore the synchronous functioning between the cortical-mood-regulating and limbic-mood-generating regions.²,¹¹ To validate this hypothesis, the effects of antidepressants on corticolimbic connectivity and regional activation need to be measured concurrently.

Functional connectivity, defined as the temporal correlation between spatially remote brain events,¹⁵ is frequently investigated by correlating task-related regional activation, and several studies have reported important findings using this method.¹⁶—²⁰ However, if two regions are highly activated by a task, they will inevitably be seen to be coactive and hence viewed as functionally connected.²¹ Therefore, to investigate the differential effects of antidepressant treatment on connectivity and regional activation, a connectivity-specific, task-independent measure may be more useful.

Steady state (resting state) measurement of coherence in electroencephalogram (EEG) data and PET regional metabolism data has been used as such a connectivity-specific, task-independent measure.²,²²,²³ Functional connectivity between brain areas can also be investigated using a more recently used connectivity-specific fMRI measure—correlation of steady (resting) state low-frequency (<0.08 Hz) blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) weighted fluctuations (LFBFs) in echoplanar imaging data. It has been recognized that these LFBFs (<0.08 Hz) are not caused by instrumentation or physiological effects (e.g., cardiac and respiratory cycles) originating outside of the brain.²⁴ It has also been shown that these resting state signal changes reflect alterations in blood flow and oxygenation that may be coupled to neuronal activity, and that LFBFs correlate between brain areas of plausible functional connectivity.²⁵—³⁵ Published studies of connectivity abnormalities using the LFBF correlation method have been reported in neuropsychiatric conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and substance abuse.³⁶—³⁹

We previously reported the results of an fMRI experiment in which we measured corticolimbic connectivity using the resting state LFBF correlations method and regional limbic activation, in response to negative versus neutral stimuli in unmedicated depressed patients and healthy subjects.¹⁰ We also previously reported the effect of antidepressant (sertraline) treatment on corticolimbic connectivity as measured with LFBF correlations.¹¹ The results of these studies indicated that resting state functional connectivity between the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the limbic regions—amygdala, pallidostriatum, and medial thalamus—decreases in depression and that antidepressant treatment reverses this abnormality.¹⁰,¹¹ It was also reported that at baseline, limbic activation was greater in depressed patients compared with healthy subjects.¹⁰ However, the effect of antidepressants on both regional activation and connectivity has not been previously reported. In this study, we report the results of the fMRI experiment pertaining to the effect of antidepressant treatment on regional limbic activation in response to negative versus neutral pictures, and the relationship between the change in resting state connectivity and regional limbic activation. We hypothesized that antidepressant treatment would lead to increased connectivity between the pregenual ACC and the limbic regions, such as the amygdala, which will be associated with decreased limbic activation in response to a negative emotional task.

METHOD

We recruited medication-free unipolar depressed outpatients from the outpatient clinic at University Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, and by advertisements from the community. Healthy subjects were recruited via advertisements and selected to match the age and gender distribution of the patient group. All subjects took part after signing an informed consent form approved by the Investigational Review Board (IRB) at Indiana University School of Medicine. Both patients and healthy subjects were paid $50 for screening and $50 for each MRI scan.

Inclusion criteria for depressed subjects were: being between the ages of 18 and 60 years and ability to give voluntary informed consent; ability to satisfy Diagnostic and Statistical Manual—IV (DSM-IV) criteria for major depressive episode; a 25-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score>18; the criteria to undergo an MRI scan based on an MRI screening questionnaire; and ability to be managed as outpatients.

Exclusion criteria for depressed patients were: meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or an anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis; use of psychotropics in the past 2 weeks; using fluoxetine in the past 4 weeks; being acutely suicidal or homicidal or requiring inpatient treatment; meeting DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence within the past year, except for caffeine or nicotine; positive urinary toxicology screening at baseline; using alcohol in the past week; serious medical or neurological illness; current pregnancy or breast feeding; metallic implants or other contraindications to MRI.

Inclusion criteria for healthy subjects were: ages 18 to 60 years and ability to give voluntary informed consent; no history of psychiatric illness or substance abuse or dependence; no significant family history of psychiatric or neurological illness; not currently taking any prescription or centrally acting medications; no use of alcohol in the past week; and no serious medical or neurological illness.

Exclusion criteria for healthy subjects were: under 18 years of age; pregnant or breast-feeding; metallic implants or other contraindications to MRI.

Antidepressant Treatment

Patients were started on a regimen of sertraline treatment, 50 mg q.d. orally, on the day they completed the baseline scan. This dosage was increased to 100 mg after 1 week. After the first two weekly visits, sertraline was increased by 50 mg every 2 weeks to a maximum of 200 mg, depending on the patient’s response and tolerance.

Behavioral Ratings

Subjects were rated on a 25-item HAM-D⁴⁰ at the time of the baseline scan and at 2 weekly intervals until they finished 6 weeks of the study.

Visual Pictures for Activation Scan

We selected pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS),⁴¹ which is a large set of standardized, emotionally evocative, internationally accessible color photographs. The IAPS pictures are rated on two primary dimensions—affective valence and arousal. Each picture is rated on a 9-point scale such that 9 represents a high rating on each dimension (high pleasure, high arousal) and 1 represents a low rating (low pleasure, low arousal). For the purpose of this study, we included ratings applicable to both genders, negative pictures of valence 2 to 3, arousal scores <6, neutral pictures of valence 4.5 to 5.5, and arousal scores <3. Different picture sets were given for baseline and after treatment fMRI activation scans.

fMRI Scan

Scans were performed in either the morning or early afternoon. Image data were acquired using a General Electric (Waukesha, Wisc.) 1.5 T MRI scanner. Subjects were placed in a birdcage head coil and individually fitted to a bite bar partially composed of a dental impression compound attached to the coil to reduce head motion. For the activation scan, visual stimuli for all tasks were computer generated and presented using MRI compatible binocular fiberoptic goggles (Avotec Inc., Jensen Beach, Fla.). Before the scan, we instructed subjects to just look at the pictures and let the feelings elicited by the pictures flow and not try to suppress the feelings elicited by the pictures. Subjects passively viewed the pictures and were not asked to rate the pictures or perform any other cognitive task, as cognitive activity has been shown to inhibit activation of the limbic system, particularly amygdala activation.⁴²,⁴³ For the resting state connectivity scan, we asked the subjects to keep their eyes closed, stay awake, and not think of anything in particular. Subjects were interviewed at the end of the scan to make sure that they had followed the instructions.

The fMRI sequence was as follows:

Visual Stimulus

The following sequence was created using E-prime software for paradigm design for presentation of pictorial stimuli:

Image analysis

The raw image data were Hamming-filtered to improve signal-to-noise ratio with minimal reduction in spatial resolution.⁴⁴

Selection of Regions of Interest

Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed by trained radiology staff (Y.W.) corresponding to the a priori-defined areas of the mood regulating circuit (Figure 1 ). For cortical regions, we chose the pregenual ACC as the ROI, as a number of neurological studies have indicated that it is involved in regulation of emotions.⁴⁵—⁴⁸ The anterior cingulate cortex ROI was delineated in the region of pregenual ACC ⁴⁶ (subregion of Brodmann area 24). Activity in this area has been shown to accompany reward-based emotional/motivational processing⁴⁶ and this area is thought to be important in emotional regulation.⁴⁵ Pallidostriatum ROI was defined as reported by Burruss et al.⁴⁹ and partially covered putamen and lateral palladium. Medial thalamus ROI was centered in the dorsal-posterior part of the thalamus. Using the "draw dataset" function in AFNI, regions of interest were defined as fixed-size circles with a radius of 6 mm for the ACC, medial thalamus and pallidostriatum and 4 mm for the amygdala. The center coordinates for each ROI are presented in Table 1 .

Relationship of Regions of Interest for Activation and Connectivity

To ascertain the relationship between these two measures, we extracted activation data from ROIs with the coordinates derived from the connectivity analysis. As the connectivity scan for each patient consisted of four noncontiguous slices, the ROI mask of average coordinates used for the ROIs was applied to the activation scan for each of the subjects to extract the activation data.

1. Activation fMRI data analysis: We performed fMRI data analysis as previously described using Statistical Parametric Mapping 1999 (SPM 99) image analysis software (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology).¹⁰ Briefly, each time series was realigned, motion and slice timing corrected, spatially normalized to MNI space, and smoothed (8 mm full width half maximum [FWHM]). Percent signal change, with an 8-second delay correction, was calculated for each ROI. For negative versus neutral pictures, the percent signal change for each block of pictures was calculated as ([average signal of all voxels within the region on exposure to negative pictures — average signal of all voxels within the region on exposure to neutral pictures]/average signal of all voxels within the region on exposure to neutral pictures) × 100.

2. LFBF correlation analysis: We performed LFBF correction analysis as previously described.¹⁰ Briefly, averaged data from all of the voxels within each ROI (as defined above) was detrended for global signal drifts using methods previously described⁵⁰ and then passed through a finite-impulse response (FIR) filter to remove all frequencies above 0.08 Hz. This removes the oxygenation fluctuations from physiological processes, such as direct sampling of respiratory and cardiac-related oxygenation fluctuations.²⁶,²⁷ Next, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the averaged LFBF time series of each ROI as a reference region with the averaged time-series of each of the other ROIs across all time points (512 in all).²⁷ The correlation coefficient was then transformed to a t statistic¹⁰,²⁷ to enable a comparison between groups. We calculated the t-score of the correlation of LFBF between two ROIs for each of the time series acquired during resting for the depressed patients and healthy groups. LFBF correlations between pregenual ACC and the limbic regions—amygdala, pallidostriatum and medial thalamus—were used a measure of connectivity between these regions before and after treatment.

Statistical Analysis

For treatment effects on activation (percent signal change) and connectivity (LFBF correlation t-score), we performed a group (depressed patients versus healthy subjects) by time (baseline versus second scan at 6 weeks) repeated measures analysis of variance(ANOVA).

Spearman’s correlations were calculated between the change after treatment in connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex ROI with each of the limbic ROIs and the change in activation of each of the limbic ROIs to look at the relationship between changes in limbic activation and changes in corticolimbic connectivity.

RESULTS

Fourteen depressed patients and 11 healthy subjects completed baseline and repeat fMRI scans. Data from one patient were excluded due to technical difficulties in the connectivity portion of the second scan. One patient’s data were excluded as, unlike other subjects, she had a strong history of recent multiple substance abuse. However, because of the use of different substances, she did not meet criteria for dependence on any one of them. Data for 12 patients and 11 healthy subjects, and subject characteristics are presented in Table 2 . Patients had a good response to treatment with 10 out of 12 patients having more than a 50% decrease in HAM-D scores after treatment.

Baseline differences and treatment effect on resting state corticolimbic connectivity have been reported previously.¹⁰,¹¹ Briefly, depressed patients showed increased limbic activation and decreased resting state corticolimbic connectivity compared with healthy subjects.¹⁰ After treatment, depressed patients had an increase in resting state functional connectivity compared with healthy subjects.¹¹

Treatment Effect on Regional Brain Activation in Response to Emotionally Valenced Pictures

Depressed patients after treatment compared to depressed patients before treatment had significant decreases in activation of the limbic regions of the mood-regulating circuit that were a priori designated as ROIs. Percent signal change for the negative versus neutral picture blocks decreased after treatment in the a priori-defined regions of interest. Healthy subjects exhibited a only a small decrease in activation in the repeat scan (Figures 2 and 3 ).

A group by time-repeated measures ANOVA interaction for percent signal change after treatment was significant for the following a priori-defined regions of interest: left amygdala (df=1, 21; F=5.98, p=0.03) (Figure 3 ) and left pallidostriatum (df=1, 21; F=5.14, p=0.04), while there was a trend for significance for right pallidostriatum (p=0.07), left medial thalamus (p=0.08) and right medial thalamus (p=0.06).

The relationship between changes in activation and connectivity between the ACC and each of the three limbic regions—amygdala, pallidostriatum, and medial thalamus—is depicted in Figures 1 and 2 . The overall trend was for antidepressant treatment to decrease limbic activation and increase corticolimbic connectivity. The relationships between changes in activation and connectivity measures after treatment are depicted in Figures 2 and 3 .

Next, we examined the correlation between the change in connectivity with pregenual ACC and activation for each of the three limbic areas on each side. A significant negative correlation was found only for the left ventral striatum (r=0.61, p<0.003) (Figure 4 ).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study indicate a reciprocal relationship between antidepressant-induced changes in resting state corticolimbic functional connectivity and limbic activation in response to negative versus neutral stimuli. The increase in phase coherence between LFBF in the ACC and the limbic regions—medial thalamus, pallidostriatum, and amygdala—may be associated with increased regulation of the cortical mood-regulating regions over the mood-regulating limbic regions. In support of this hypothesis, limbic regions after treatment showed a decrease in activation and an increase in connectivityn with the ACC. For the left pallidostriatum this reciprocal relationship was the strongest and achieved statistical significance.

The correlation of LFBF between two areas is a measure of functional connectivity (i.e., that two are in synchrony).¹⁵ However, this could also occur because of the influence of a third factor that may simultaneously affect both areas. In the future, to measure the actual effect of one area over another (i.e., a measure of effective connectivity), LFBF correlation data could inform the analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM)⁵¹ methods or newer techniques such as Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM)⁵² and investigation of structural connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).⁵³

The duration of a medication-free period for psychiatric studies always contains a compromise between what is ideal and what is clinically feasible. We chose a 2-week period minimum for patients to be off medication as the usual half-life of most antidepressants is 12 to 24 hours, and therefore most antidepressants (except fluoxetine for which we required a 4-week medication-free period) should be washed off within a week. Another week would make sure that all the residual effects of the medication are accounted for. However, long-term effects of antidepressants may still linger. Future studies could be conducted to address this issue with a larger number of subjects using subjects’ previous medication status as a covariate in the analysis.

For both activation and connectivity there was a decrease in the repeat testing in healthy subjects, which was probably a test-retest effect. These results underlie the importance of studying healthy subjects at the same time points as the patients before and after treatment and the treatment effect analyzed as the difference between the time points using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (diagnosis × time). Other studies have also used this strategy to examine treatment effects using fMRI.¹²,¹³ Another reason for the decrease appeared to be the small number of subjects studied in which individual subject results can have an inordinate effect on the mean. In the future, this type of study will be conducted with a larger number of subjects and with an improved methodology of image acquisition (e.g., better signal acquisition from basal regions of the brain, such as the amygdala) to decrease the variance in the data.

This study was limited by the small number of subjects studied for the number of variables analyzed. The reciprocal relationship between connectivity and regional limbic activation changes was seen with all three a priori-defined limbic ROIs, but the negative correlation reached statistical significance only for the left striatum. This could be a function of the small number of subjects that were studied, and future studies should include larger numbers of subjects to further confirm these findings.

This study was not able to differentiate between the acute effects of the antidepressants and the more long-term antidepressant effects as data were acquired only after 6 weeks of treatment. Another limitation of the study was the open label design, making it difficult to differentiate between the active versus placebo effects of antidepressant treatment. Ten out of 12 patients responded to treatment; therefore, a comparison between responders and nonresponders was not feasible. Finally, the ventral areas of the brain, such as the amygdala, are characterized by a lower signal-to-noise ratio than from cortical areas because of susceptibility artifacts. To control for these limitations, the findings of this study will need to be further validated with better design, for example, with a randomized, placebo controlled arm; better stimulus presentation with random order and collection of behavioral ratings; and better image acquisition methodology, such as techniques to obtain a better signal from the ventral areas of the brain.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

FIGURE 1. Region of Interest Placement for Sampling of Low Frequency BOLD Fluctuations for Corticolimbic Connectivity Analysis

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

FIGURE 2. Depressed Patients Before and After Treatment

Relationship between changes in corticolimbic activation and connectivity before and after six weeks sertraline treatment in depressed patients

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

FIGURE 3. Healthy Comparison Subjects at Baseline and Repeat Scan

Relationship between changes in activation and connectivity at baseline and repeat scan in healthy comparison subjects

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

FIGURE 4. Simple Regression Plot Between Change in ACC-Left Pallidostriatal Connectivity and Left Pallidostriatal Activation

After 6 weeks of treatment with sertraline in depressed patients (p < 0.003), increased connectivity was associated with greater decrease in left striatum activation in response to negative vs. neutral pictures.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

TABLE 1. Talairach Coordinates for Connectivity Analysis and Corresponding Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) Coordinates for Activation Analysis

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My POL

TABLE 2. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients and Healthy Subjects*

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Indiana University 21st Century Fund and INGEN fund. The first author has received travel funds and honorarium from Pfizer Inc., U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group for consultation and presentations. The results of this study were previously presented in part at the Meeting of Society of Biological Psychiatry and American Psychiatric Association Meeting, San Francisco, Calif., 2003, and at the Human Brain Mapping Meeting, New York, NY, 2003.

References

Anand A, Charney DS: Abnormality of catecholamines and pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Edited by Soares JC, Gershon S. New York, Marcel Dekker, 2000, pp 59-94

Mayberg HS: Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for diagnosis and optimised treatment. Br Med Bull 2003; 65:193—207

Ketter TA: Functional brain imaging, limbic function, and affective disorders. Neuroscientist 1996; 2:55—65

Mayberg HS, Liotti M, Brannan SK, et al: Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:675—682

Drevets WC, Price JL, Simpson JR Jr, et al: Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders. Nature 1997; 386:824—827

Anand A, Shekhar A: Brain imaging studies in mood and anxiety disorders: special emphasis on the amygdala. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 985:370—388

Siegle GJ, Steinhauer SR, Thase ME, et al: Can’t shake that feeling: event-related fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individuals. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51:693—707

Sheline YI, Barch DM, Donnelly JM, et al: Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 50:651—658

Drevets WC: Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:813—829

Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, et al: Activity and connectivity of mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 15:1079—1088

Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, et al: Antidepressant effect on connectivity of the mood-regulating circuit: an fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005; 30:1334—1344

Davidson RJ, Irwin W, Anderle MJ, et al: The neural substrates of affective processing in depressed patients treated with venlafaxine. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:64—75

Fu CHY, Williams SCR, Cleare AJ, et al: Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:877—889

Anand A, Charney DS: Norepinephrine dysfunction in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61(suppl 10):16—24

Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, et al: Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13:5—14

Lawrie SM, Buechel C, Whalley HC, et al: Reduced frontotemporal functional connectivity in schizophrenia associated with auditory hallucinations. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51:1008—1011

McIntosh AR, Gonzalez-Lima F: Large-scale functional connectivity in associative learning: interrelations of the rat auditory, visual, and limbic systems. J Neurophysiology 1998; 80:3148—3162

Liu Y, Gao JH, Liotti M, et al: Temporal dissociation of parallel processing in the human subcortical outputs. Nature 1999; 400:364—367

Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM, et al: 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8:828—834

Heinz A, Braus DF, Smolka MN, et al: Amygdala-prefrontal coupling depends on a genetic variation of the serotonin transporter. Nat Neuroscience 2005; 8:20—21

Xiong J, Parsons LM, Gao JH, et al: Interregional connectivity to primary motor cortex revealed using MRI resting state images. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8:151—156

French CC, Beaumont JG: A critical review of EEG coherence studies of hemisphere function. Int J Psychophysiology 1984; 1:241—254

Montplaisir J, Nielsen T, Cote J, et al: Interhemispheric EEG coherence before and after partial callosotomy. Clin Electroencephalography 1990; 21:42—47

Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, et al: Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:537—541

Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, et al: Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:537—541

Cordes D, Haughton VM, Arfanakis K, et al: Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in "resting-state" data. Am J Neuroradiology 2001; 22:1326—1333

Lowe MJ, Mock BJ, Sorenson JA: Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuroimage 1998; 7:119—132

Peltier SJ, Noll DC: T(2)(*) dependence of low frequency functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2002; 16:985—992

Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, et al: A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:676—682

Salvador R, Suckling J, Coleman MR, et al: Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereberal Cortex 2005; Advance online publication

Maldjian JA: Functional connectivity MR imaging: fact or artifact? Am J Neuroradiology 2001; 22:239—240

Stein T, Moritz C, Quigley M, et al: Functional connectivity in the thalamus and hippocampus studied with functional MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiology 2000; 21:1397—1401

Lowe MJ, Dzemidzic M, Lurito JT, et al: Correlations in low-frequency bold fluctuations reflect cortico-cortical connections. Neuroimage 2000; 12:582—587

Hampson M, Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, et al: Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 15:247—262

Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, et al: Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:253—258

Lowe MJ, Phillips MD, Lurito JT, et al: Multiple sclerosis: low-frequency temporal blood oxygen level-dependent fluctuations indicate reduced functional connectivity initial results. Radiology 2002; 224:184—192

Kapp BS, Supple WF, Pascoe JP: Amygdaloid contribution to conditioned arousal and sensory information processing, in The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory and Mental Dysfunction. Edited by Aggleton J. New York, Wiley-Liss, 1992, pp 229—254

Li SJ, Li Z, Wu G, et al: Alzheimer disease: evaluation of a functional MR imaging index as a marker. Radiology 2002; 225:253—259

Greicius MD, Srivastava G, Reiss AL, et al: Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:4637—4642

Thase ME, Carpenter L, Kupfer DJ, et al: Clinical significance of reversed vegetative subtypes of recurrent major depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 1991; 27:17—22

Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN: International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainsville, The Center for Research and Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1997

Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, et al: Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 2002; 16:331—348

Mayberg H: Depression, in Brain Mapping: The Disorders. Edited by Mazziotta J, Toga AW, Frackowiak R. London, Academic Press, 2000, pp 485—507

Lowe MJ, Sorenson JA: Spatially filtering functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:723—729

Damasio AR: Towards a neuropathology of emotion and mood. Nature 1997; 386:769—770

Critchley HD: The human cortex responds to an interoceptive challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:6333—6334

Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, et al: Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:830—843

Drevets WC: Functional neuroimaging studies of depression: the anatomy of melancholia. Ann Rev Med 1998; 49:341—361

Burruss JW: Functional neuroanatomy of the frontal lobe circuits. Radiology 2000; 214:227—230

Lowe MJ, Russell DP: Treatment of baseline drifts in fmri time series analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:463—473

McIntosh AR, Grady CL, Ungerleider LG, et al: Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J Neuroscience 1994; 14:655—666

Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W: Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19:1273—1302

Ramnani N, Behrens TE, Penny W, et al: New approaches for exploring anatomical and functional connectivity in the human brain. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56:613—619

Download all saved figures as a .zip file.

View Large
Download Slide(.ppt)

Add to My POL