0
Get Alert
Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

1
Neuropsychiatric Practice and Opinion   |    
Introduction
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2001;13:403-403. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.3.403
text A A A

In this issue we present an exchange of views arising from the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for delusions. Anchoring the discussion is an article by Drs. Mujica-Parodi and Sackeim in which they examine the DSM-IV requirement that to be classified as a delusion, a belief must be discordant with beliefs ordinarily accepted by the patient's culture or subculture. They propose that an information-processing model would avoid what they regard as the relativism and ambiguity of this DSM-IV criterion. Drs. Cutting and Fabrega critique the model and reflect further on the diagnosis of delusions, and the authors reply.

+

References

+
+

CME Activity

There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of APA editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Related Content
Articles
Books
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 11.  >
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 11.  >
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 11.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 24.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News