The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 17:548-551, November 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17.4.548
© 2005 American Neuropsychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Childs, A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Childs, A.
Related Collections
* Other Treatment
* Miscellaneous Violence/Aggression

Clinical and Research Reports

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation Reduces Aggression in a Violent Retarded Population: A Preliminary Report

Allen Childs, M.D., F.A.P.A.

Received April 21, 2004; revised June 18, 2004; accepted August 16, 2004. From North Texas State Hospital-Vernon Campus, Multiple Disabilities Unit, Vernon, Texas. Dr. Childs is also Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas. Address correspondence to Dr. Childs, North Texas State Hospital-Vernon Campus, 4730 College Dr., Vernon, TX 76384; allen.childs{at}dshs.state.tx.us (E-mail).

ABSTRACT

Nine aggressive, retarded patients refractory to conventional care at a maximum security hospital were given a 3-month course of cranial electrotherapy stimulation. Aggressive episodes declined 59% from baseline; seclusions were down 72%; restraints were down 58%; and use of prescribed-as-needed sedative medications decreased 53%. The most dramatic change was that of a disorganized, schizophrenic patient whose aggressive episodes declined from 62 to 9, seclusions from 53 to 8, restraints from 9 to 1 and PRNs from 25 to 1. No patients discontinued cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) because of side effects. This preliminary report indicates that CES appears to be an efficacious, safe, and cost-effective addition to the treatment regimen in this patient population.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Neuropsychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Neuropsychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org