The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:121-128, February 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18.1.121
© 2006 American Neuropsychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Fleminger, S.
* Articles by McCarthy, C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Fleminger, S.
* Articles by McCarthy, C.
Related Collections
* Neuropsychology
* Service Utilization

Neuropsychiatric Practice and Opinion

The Size of Demand for Specialized Neuropsychiatry Services: Rates of Referrals to Neuropsychiatric Services in the South Thames Region of the United Kingdom

Simon Fleminger, M.D., Eleanor Leigh, BSc. and Camilla McCarthy, BSc.

Received November 1, 2004; revised July 22, 2005; accepted August 2, 2005. From the Lishman Brain Injury Unit, the Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom. Address correspondence to Dr. Fleminger, Lishman Brain Injury Unit, the Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ UK; s.fleminger{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk (E-mail).

The authors assessed the number of referrals to neuropsychiatry services covering South London, Kent, Surrey, and Sussex (population 6,887,000) over a 2-year period. The average referral rate was 11.2 per 100,000 per population for each year. Geographical distance from the specialist provider strongly affected referral rates, with clinicians in South London making more referrals than those from outside London. Assessment of appropriateness of referrals indicated that more than 86% of referrals were highly appropriate, and thus the higher level of referrals from close proximity cannot be attributed to inappropriate referrals. A survey of clinicians reported lower awareness of services and how to access these services among those clinicians working at a greater distance from the service provider, which likely results in unmet needs. Greater attempts should be made to improve access to neuropsychiatric services for clinicians who do not practice within close proximity of a specialist neuropsychiatry service.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
N. Agrawal, S. Fleminger, H. Ring, and S. Deb
Neuropsychiatry in the UK: national survey of existing service provision
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2008; 32(8): 288 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
N. Agrawal, S. Fleminger, H. Ring, and S. Deb
Neuropsychiatry in the UK: planning the service provision for the 21st century
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2008; 32(8): 303 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
J. Kuruvatti and S. Fleminger
Pitfalls and potential dangers in the referral process to a specialist brain injury unit
Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2008; 32(7): 250 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Neuropsychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Neuropsychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org