Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Harvey, P. D. Articles by Loebel, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Harvey, P. D. Articles by Loebel, A. Neuropsychology

Neuropsychological Normalization With Long-Term Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment: Results of a Six-Month Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Ziprasidone vs. Olanzapine

Received August 13, 2004, revised December 1, 2004; accepted December 7, 2004. From the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New York, New York; and Pfizer Inc., Neuroscience, New York, New York. Address correspondence to Dr. Harvey, Department of Psychiatry, Box 1229 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029; philipdharvey1{at}cs.com (E-mail).

The authors examined cognitive changes associated with treatment with ziprasidone and olanzapine over a 6-month double-blind clinical trial, using normative standards for the cognitive measures. Sixty-two schizophrenia patients entered the study on ziprasidone treatment (39 completers), and 71 patients entered while receiving treatment with olanzapine (33 completers). From a larger set of cognitive domains assessed in the acute treatment study, we selected verbal learning, executive functioning, and verbal fluency for further analysis due to their functional relevance and extensive normative data. Standard scores were developed based on previously published age- and education-corrected norms. Baseline performance was impaired across all tests on average. The proportion of patients impaired on each of the tests at baseline ranged from 36% (letter fluency) to 89%. Performance was significantly improved by ziprasidone and olanzapine treatment for all cognitive variables and for the composite measure. A number of subjects met the a priori criteria for normalization in performance, ranging from 10% for Trail Making Test Part B to 37% for Word List Total Learning. There were no significant differences across medications in extent of change or likelihood of inducing normalization. Statistically significant improvements in cognitive performance over 6 months of treatment with atypical antipsychotic medications are associated with performance increasing into the normal range of cognitive functioning in a proportion of previously impaired patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. O. Brooks and J. C. Hoblyn Neurocognitive Costs and Benefits of Psychotropic Medications in Older Adults J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, December 1, 2007; 20(4): 199 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. K. Erickson, J. R. Ciccone, S. B. Schwarzkopf, J. S. Lamberti, and M. J. Vitacco Legal Fallacies of Antipsychotic Drugs J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2007; 35(2): 235 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Neuropsychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us