The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

The authors aimed to determine the prevalence of antineuronal antibodies in 103 psychiatric inpatients and 41 control subjects with no history of malignancies or neurological disorders. All sera were tested by indirect immunofluorescence and positive sera by immunoblot. Using immunofluorescence, antineuronal nuclear autoantibodies were detected in 20 patients and none of the control subjects, and antibodies reacted with the cytoplasm of Purkinje cells in six patients and two control subjects. The immunoblot confirmed well-characterized antineuronal antibodies only in five patients: two had anti-Ri and three had anti-Yo antibodies. After a follow-up of 5 years, none of these patients developed neurological disorder or malignancy.

Currently, autoimmunity is considered a promising research axis in psychiatry supported by several clinical and biological arguments. In fact, schizophrenia (SKZ) and related disorders share several clinical and biological characteristics with autoimmune diseases,1,2 especially production of several autoantibodies.35

Antineuronal autoantibodies were first described in sera of patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and gynecological tumors.6 More recently, these antibodies were associated with several neurological disorders7,8 with no associated malignancies.

Antineuronal antibodies may target nuclear or cytoplasmic antigens. Antineuronal nuclear autoantibodies (ANNA) are of two types: 1 and 2, also called anti-Hu and anti-Ri, respectively. Antibodies reacting with cytoplasm of Purkinje cells (PCA1) are also called anti-Yo.9

In a previous study,5 we reported that adult psychiatric Tunisian patients had a particular profile of autoimmunity with the production of several autoantibodies.

In this work, we hypothesized that at least a subgroup of these patients may also have autoreactivity against neuronal antigens.

We aimed in this study to determine the prevalence of antineuronal antibodies in Tunisian psychiatric inpatients.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

We enrolled in this prospective study 103 psychiatric inpatients admitted to psychiatric ward F in Al Razi Mental Health Hospital (Manouba, Tunisia) during a 3-month period. All patients underwent a systematic clinical examination and an extensive neurological investigation. Forty-one healthy, age- and sex-matched blood donors were used as a control group. All control subjects underwent a careful clinical assessment investigating somatic and psychiatric morbidity. Patients and control subjects had no history of malignancies or neurological disorders. Psychiatric diagnosis was made by two different psychiatrists according to DSM-IV criteria.10 We distinguished four groups of patients: patients with SKZ, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder and a group of the rest of the patients presenting with other psychiatric diagnoses.

Considering elementary symptoms, we also studied patients according to the presence of psychotic and/or affective symptoms as listed in the diagnosis criteria of DSM-IV.

Patients and control subjects gave their informed consent to participate in the study, and the protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Al Razi hospital.

Methods

Antineuronal antibodies were assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using a commercially available kit (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, sera at 1/100 were incubated on cerebellum of monkey tissue sections. Fluorescein-labeled antihuman immunoglobulin G conjugate was used as a secondary antibody. Slides were examined on a fluorescence photomicroscopeon. The ANNA-positive sera labeled the nuclei of all cerebellum cells, whereas PCA1-positive sera labeled the cytoplasm of Purkinje cells.

Subjects’ sera were also tested for antinuclear antibodies on Hep2 cells by IIF (Biomedical Diagnostics, Marne-la-Vallée, France). Positivity for these antibodies was taken into account when analyzing antineuronal antibodies.

To further analyze target antigens of antineuronal antibodies, positive sera were tested with an immunoenzymatic test, combining Western blot on primate cerebellum protein extract and dot technique with highly purified recombinant Hu, Ri, and Yo neuronal antigens (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). After blot strip blocking, sera were incubated at 1/51 for 1 hour at room temperature. To detect the bound antibodies, a second incubation was carried out using an alkaline phosphatase-labeled antihuman IgG. According to the manufacturer instructions, serum is considered as anti-Hu positive if it stains a band of 38 kDa and recombinant Hu simultaneously; anti-Ri positive if it stains two bands of 55 and 80 kDa and recombinant Ri simultaneously; and anti-Yo positive if it stains a band of 62 kDa and recombinant Yo simultaneously. In some cases, sera also reacted with a band of 34 kDa.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (IBM, Armonk, N.Y.). A chi-square test, analysis of variance, Dunnett's test, or Kurskal-Wallis test was used where appropriate to compare the frequency of positive antibodies between the four diagnostic groups and the control subjects and to analyze the different clinical variables across the sample. The statistical significance was based on p≤0.05.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Among the 103 included patients, 47 patients (45.6%) had SKZ, 23 patients (22.3%) had schizoaffective disorder, and 16 patients (15.5%) had bipolar disorder. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients and Controls

SKZ (N=47)SAD (N=23)BPD (N=16)Others (N=17)Patients (whole sample N=103)Control subjects (N'=41)
Age (years)42.38±13.4842.83±14.1138.88±10.249.35±17.0843.09±13.9841.17±7.6
Sex (male/female)35/1217/610/612/574/2932/9
Age of onset (years)25.89±8.4127.24±8.9822.38±7.3836.18±16.4427.36±10.90
Disease duration (years)16.54±12.7713.19±9.2916.56±9.3313.29±13.7615.29±11.75

BPD: bipolar disorder; SAD: schizoaffective disorder; SKZ: schizophrenia.

TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients and Controls

Enlarge table

Considering the categories of symptoms, 54 patients (52.4%) had psychotic symptoms without affective signs, seven patients (6.8%) had isolated affective symptoms, and 36 patients (34.9%) had affective and psychotic signs.

There was no significant difference in age and sex between the four diagnosis groups and the control subjects.

One hundred patients (97.1%) were receiving pharmacological treatment (89 patients received neuroleptics, 69 received anticholinergic antiparkinsonian drugs, 50 received mood stabilizers, and 58 received anxioloytic medication).

Serological Data

Immunofluorescence Results.

Results of autoantibodies tested by IIF are shown in Table 2. Twelve patients had antinuclear antibodies, and five of them had simultaneously ANNA. There was no difference of the prevalence of autoantibodies across the four groups of patients. However, ANNA was significantly more prevalent in patients than in control subjects (19.4% versus 0%, p=0.001) when considering the whole cohort. These autoantobodies were significantly more frequent in patients with SKZ than in control subjects (21% versus 0%, p=0.001) and in patients with bipolar disorder than in control subjects (31.5% versus 0%, p=0.049).

TABLE 2. Autoantibodies Tested by Immunofluorescence in Patients and Control Subjects

SKZ (N=47)SAD (N=23)BPD (N=16)Others (N=17)Patients (whole sample N=103)Control subjects (N'=41)
ANA4 (8.5%)3 (13%)3 (18.8%)2 (11.8%)12 (11.7%)5 (12.2%)
ANNA10 (21%)a2 (8.7%)5 (31.2%)b3 (17.7%)20 (19.4%)c0 (0%)
PCA14 (8.5%)0 (0%)1 (6.2%)2 (11.8%)7 (6.8%)2 (4.9%)

ANA: antinuclear antibodies; ANNA: antineuronal nuclear autoantibodies; BPD: bipolar disorder; PCA1: antibodies reacting with cytoplasm of Purkinje cells; SAD: schizoaffective disorder; SKZ: schizophrenia.

aIn comparison with control group, p=0.001.

bIn comparison with control group, p=0.049.

cIn comparison with control group, p=0.001.

TABLE 2. Autoantibodies Tested by Immunofluorescence in Patients and Control Subjects

Enlarge table

ANNA was not associated with affective or with psychotic symptoms. However, PCA1 was more frequently seen in patients presenting with affective symptoms (85.7% versus 38.5%, p=0.02).

The presence of autoantibodies was not influenced by sex. However, PCA1 was associated with younger age in patients but not in control subjects (p=0.045).

No association was found between treatment and the presence of the different autoantibodies.

Immunoblot Results.

Among the 20 sera of patients considered positive for ANNA by IIF (Figure 1), none reacted with recombinant Hu; two sera showed a very intense reactivity with a 40-kDa protein; nine had reactivity with a 55-kDa protein and two of them reacted with both 55- and 80-kDa proteins simultaneously with intense staining of recombinant Ri; two sera showed high staining of a 55-kDa protein but didn’t stain recombinant Ri; one serum reacted with both 55- and 62-kDa proteins simultaneously with intense staining of recombinant Yo (this serum had also a high titer of antinuclear antibodies); and one serum reacted with a 34-kDa protein.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. Western Blot Results of Two Patients

Concerning the subjects positive for PCA1 by IIF, two of six patients’ sera reacted simultaneously with a 62-kDa protein and with recombinant Yo; the five remaining positive patients and the two positive control subjects showed a variable staining of the 62-kDa protein; and none of the PCA1-positive sera reacted with the 34-kDa protein considered a second target of anti-Yo antibodies.

In summary, the well-characterized antineuronal antibodies were detected in only five patients: two had anti-Ri (one man and one woman with SKZ) and three had anti-Yo antibodies (three men: two with bipolar disorder and one with SKZ). After a follow-up of 5 years, none of these patients developed neurological disorder or malignancy.

Discussion

To date, studies on antineuronal antibodies have focused on paraneoplastic neurological disorders or other neurological conditions. The presence of antineuronal antibodies in adult psychiatric diseases has not yet been assessed.

In the present work, we studied a large cohort of psychiatric patients and found that ANNA revealed by IIF is significantly more prevalent in patients than control subjects, especially in those with SKZ and bipolar disorder. Moreover, PCA1 was associated with affective symptoms. Although first described as markers of paraneoplastic syndrome, ANNA was also found in patients with neurological syndromes of unknown etiology and occasionally in healthy individuals.11 The IIF staining on cerebellar cryosections shows binding to neuronal nuclei, especially of Purkinje cells. Nonneuronal nuclei are not stained.9 However, interpretation is difficult in patients with positive antinuclear antibodies, which was the case in five of our patients. None of our patients with ANNA staining had confirmed anti-Hu antibody because no reactivity was shown with recombinant Hu; however, two sera strongly reacted with 40-kDa neuronal proteins. Different kinds of atypical reactivity were already reported in sera of patients with neurological disorder without paraneoplastic syndrome. In fact, Vianello et al tested 719 sera from patients with neurological disorder and no suspicion of paraneoplastic disease by immunohistochemistry on rat cerebellum and by immunoblot of human extract cerebellum. Nine patients had anti-Hu anibodies and seven others had atypical reactivity.12

Otherwise, two of our patients with SKZ with ANNA staining had confirmed anti-Ri antibodies. It is difficult to distinguish anti-Hu and anti-Ri antibodies by IIF on primate cerebellum because the two react with nuclei of central neurons. In fact, anti-Hu antibodies react with nuclei of both central and peripheral neurons, whereas anti-Ri reacts only with the nuclei of central neurons.9 However, it is imperative to confirm the specificity with Western blot of cerebellum extract and including recombinant antigens, which was the case in our study.

Anti-Ri antibodies are reported as rarer than anti-Hu antibodies in association with paraneoplastic syndromes and especially in gynecological and lung cancers.13 To the best of our knowledge, these antibodies were not associated with SKZ.

It is interesting to note that one of our sera with positive ANNA by IIF was considered anti-Yo positive because it reacted simultaneously with a 62-kDa protein and recombinant Yo. This serum was also positive for antinuclear antibodies, raising the question of the difficulty in interpreting IIF when there are different types of reactivity. For this reason, the majority of authors recommend the use of Western blot analysis with recombinant antigens.

Among the seven patients and the two controls with suspected PCA1 by IIF, only two patients reacted with recombinant Yo and were considered confirmed anti-Yo antibodies.

These antibodies are also associated with paraneoplastic syndromes and especially with gynecological cancers14; thus, they are more frequently detected in female patients, contrary to our study.

Anti-Tr antibody is another antineuronal antibody staining the cytoplasm of Purkinje cells, which could cause confusion in the interpretation of patterns. This antibody was also reported in association with Hodgkin’s disease in younger patients.15,16 Surprisingly, anti-PCA1 antibodies were associated with younger age in patients but not in control subjects (p=0.045).

Anti-Tr antibodies cannot be confirmed by immunoblot or by using recombinant antigens because they seem recognize conformational epitopes.

Surprisingly, no association was found between the treatment and the presence of the different autoantibodies. It’s well known that neuroleptics and especially phenothiazines had a stimulating effect on B lymphocytes-producing antibodies.17 This may be explained by the reduced number of our patients.

It has been reported that neurological symptoms of paraneoplastic syndromes could appear several years before tumor diagnosis.11 These antibodies may predict cancers but they are not necessarily markers of an underlying tumor. In fact, after a follow-up of 5 years, none of our patients developed a neoplasm or a neurological paraneoplastic syndrome. This has already been reported in some patients with neurological manifestations11 but never in those with psychiatric diseases.

Although they were first described as markers of paraneoplastic syndrome, antineuronal antibodies were also described in several other conditions. Most of these studies reported atypical relativities. In fact, Ben Yahiya et al8 tested 71 patients with Gougerot Sjogren syndrome and 102 patients with lupus erythematosus and reported a high frequency of antineuronal, antibodies but only two cases had well-characterized anti-Hu antibodies.

Concerning psychiatric diseases, the presence of antineuronal antibodies has already been reported in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette syndrome,18,19 in the context of the controversial concept of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infection. However, in these conditions, autoantibodies detected triggered brain and basal ganglia antigens.

More recently, these antibodies were detected in autistic children. Even more, they were associated with the severity of the disease.20,21

To our knowledge, our study is the first one assessing the prevalence of antineuronal antibodies in adult psychiatric patients. We report here a high prevalence of these antibodies, especially in patients with SKZ and bipolar disorder. This finding suggests that two apparently distinct psychiatric disorders may share common etiopathogenic factors. In fact, some subgroups among these disorders may share common biological processes that participate in the pathogenesis of the clinical symptoms. This hypothesis fits with the genetic model of vulnerability in psychiatry as it is now clear that clinical diagnosis as distinct as SKZ, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depression share some susceptibility genetic factors.22,23

Conversely, some authors24,25 have proposed considering patients according to categories of symptoms and not to the classical clinical diagnosis as defined by DSM criteria. The association of PCA1 to the presence of affective symptoms in patients with different diagnosis supports the latter hypothesis.

Thus, in our patients where an antigen–antibody reaction was found triggering classical or unknown targets, this feature may suggest an immunological basis for disease pathogenesis and may be responsible for a range of symptoms. However, these antibodies may also be produced as a consequence of a local damage or by alternative immune mechanisms.

Conclusions

We report here a high prevalence of antineuronal antibodies; the majority do not recognize classical targets. The presence of these antibodies in our patients may highlight the possible contribution of neuronal autoantigens in the physiopathology of some psychiatric disorders, especially SKZ and bipolar disorder. Further studies on a larger number of patients and characterization of these neuronal autoantigens are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

From the Dept. of Immunology, Al Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia (LL, NS, MZ, HL, MKS, SM); and Research Unit 03/04 “Schizophrenias,” Dept. of Psychiatry F, Al Razi Mental Health Hospital, Mannouba, Tunisia (OS, WA, ZEH).
Send correspondence to Laadhar Lilia, M.D.; e-mail:
References

1 Nikkilä HV, Müller K, Ahokas A, et al.: Increased frequency of activated lymphocytes in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with acute schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2001; 49:99–105Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Rothermundt M, Arolt V, Bayer TA: Review of immunological and immunopathological findings in schizophrenia. Brain Behav Immun 2001; 15:319–339Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Heath RG, Krupp IM: Schizophrenia as an immunologic disorder. I. Demonstration of antibrain globulins by fluorescent antibody techniques. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1967; 16:1–9Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Padmos RC, Bekris L, Knijff EM, et al.: A high prevalence of organ-specific autoimmunity in patients with bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56:476–482Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Sidhom O, Laadhar L, Zitouni M, et al.: Spectrum of autoantibodies in Tunisian psychiatric inpatients. Immunol Invest 2012; 41:538–549Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Trotter JL, Hendin BA, Osterland CK: Cerebellar degeneration with Hodgkin disease. An immunological study. Arch Neurol 1976; 33:660–661Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Nemni R, Camerlingo M, Fazio R, et al.: Serum antibodies to Purkinje cells and dorsal root ganglia neurons in sensory neuronopathy without malignancy. Ann Neurol 1993; 34:848–854Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Benyahia B, Amoura Z, Rousseau A, et al.: Paraneoplastic antineuronal antibodies in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. J Neurooncol 2003; 62:349–351Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Karim AR, Hughes RG, Lahawi EL, et al: Paraneoplastic neurological antibodies, in: Autoantibodies second ed, edited by Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME, Meron PL. New York, Elsevier, 1997, pp 627–652Google Scholar

10 American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1994Google Scholar

11 Graus F, Delattre JY, Antoine JC, et al.: Recommended diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:1135–1140Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Vianello M, Vitaliani R, Pezzani R, et al.: The spectrum of antineuronal autoantibodies in a series of neurological patients. J Neurol Sci 2004; 220:29–36Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Luque FA, Furneaux HM, Ferziger R, et al.: Anti-Ri: an antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer. Ann Neurol 1991; 29:241–251Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Peterson K, Rosenblum MK, Kotanides H, et al.: Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. I. A clinical analysis of 55 anti-Yo antibody-positive patients. Neurology 1992; 42:1931–1937Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Graus F, Dalmau J, Valldeoriola F, et al.: Immunological characterization of a neuronal antibody (anti-Tr) associated with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and Hodgkin’s disease. J Neuroimmunol 1997; 74:55–61Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 Shams’ili S, Grefkens J, de Leeuw B, et al.: Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration associated with antineuronal antibodies: analysis of 50 patients. Brain 2003; 126:1409–1418Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17 Strous RD, Shoenfeld Y: Schizophrenia, autoimmunity and immune system dysregulation: a comprehensive model updated and revisited. J Autoimmun 2006; 27:71–80Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Morer A, Lázaro L, Sabater L, et al.: Antineuronal antibodies in a group of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder and Tourette syndrome. J Psychiatr Res 2008; 42:64–68Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19 Gause C, Morris C, Vernekar S, et al.: Antineuronal antibodies in OCD: comparisons in children with OCD-only, OCD+chronic tics and OCD+PANDAS. J Neuroimmunol 2009; 214:118–124Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Goines P, Haapanen L, Boyce R, et al.: Autoantibodies to cerebellum in children with autism associate with behavior. Brain Behav Immun 2011; 25:514–523Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21 Mostafa GA, Al-Ayadhi LY: The relationship between the increased frequency of serum antineuronal antibodies and the severity of autism in children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16:464–468Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22 Porteous D: Genetic causality in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: out with the old and in with the new. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008; 18:229–234Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23 Ginsburg BE, Werick TM, Escobar JI, et al.: Molecular genetics of psychopathologies: a search for simple answers to complex problems. Behav Genet 1996; 26:325–333Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 van Os J, Tamminga C: Deconstructing psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33:861–862Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25 Gaebel W, Zielasek J: The DSM-V initiative “deconstructing psychosis” in the context of Kraepelin’s concept on nosology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 258(Suppl 2):41–47Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar