The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.11.4.423

Structural neuroimaging is becoming increasingly important for neuropsychiatry.2,3 However, it is not uncommon for patients to present with neuropsychiatric symptoms consistent with brain pathology yet without clearly identifiable lesions on either computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) structural images. There are no reliable estimates of how frequently this apparent absence of lesions in the presence of symptoms is likely to occur. Stroke may be missed (false negative) in 5% to 30% of cases.46 A study of primary progressive aphasia found CT was normal in 50% and MR in 17% of the cases.7 Similarly, systemic lupus erythematosus may present with extensive neuropsychiatric symptoms but without MR-visible abnormalities.8 It has been suggested that many types of pathology may be difficult to visualize because they are small or diffuse in nature.9

Adding a method of functional neuroimaging to the clinical examination may provide a way to identify such abnormalities. A recent study at a neuropsychiatric tertiary referral center found that 40% of the study population had normal MR or CT studies. Most of these (77% of patients with normal structural neuroimaging) had abnormal cerebral blood flow (CBF) images.10 Even when structural brain imaging shows lesions are present, functional neuroimaging may provide a better assessment of brain dysfunction. Changes in cognitive symptoms closely correlated with changes on functional neuroimaging (CBF and cerebral glucose uptake), but not necessarily with structural neuroimaging, in recent studies of vascular dementia.11,12 Thus, functional neuroimaging may provide useful information for clinical management.

Until recently, functional neuroimaging techniques were available only in a research-oriented environment and were quite expensive to perform. Now, with the maturation of xenon-enhanced computed tomography (Xe/CT), the imaging of CBF has the potential to become widely available and may become a valuable diagnostic tool. Xe/CT is based on the use of stable xenon gas as an inhaled contrast agent for CT imaging, possible because it is radiodense and lipid-soluble. When inhaled, it dissolves into the blood and passes into the brain parenchyma. The patient inhales a mixture of xenon (usually 26%–33%) and oxygen for several minutes via a face mask. CT scans are acquired prior to inhalation (providing a baseline) and during this inhalation time (a “wash-in” study). More scans may be acquired following inhalation, as well (a “wash-in/washout” study). Standard CT scanners can acquire three to four brain slices per Xe/CT study. The new spiral CT systems, which are rapidly replacing the standard scanners, can acquire eight to ten slices. This is sufficient for reasonable coverage of the brain. Several sets of scans are acquired at each brain level, allowing calculation of a xenon arrival curve for each pixel of each slice. This information, along with the concentration of xenon in the expired air (an indirect measure of arterial concentration), is required to calculate CBF for each pixel.1315

Initial Xe/CT studies were limited by the side effects of xenon gas and the time required to acquire and compute the CBF images. Advances in technology have brought the time to compute the images down from hours to seconds. Xenon is a narcotic gas, more potent than nitrous oxide. Inhalation of 71% xenon is sufficient for anesthetic effect in 50% of patients. Present studies use much lower doses than this, as noted above, but some euphoric or dysphoric side effects are seen (which may cause a temporary exacerbation of neuropsychiatric symptoms), as is somnolence. Mild nausea can also occur; thus the patient must take nothing by mouth for 4 hours prior to scanning to reduce the risks of emesis and aspiration. Very rarely, patients experience apnea, reversible by an instruction to breathe. Like other narcotic gases, xenon also causes mild cerebral vasodilation. Overall, approximately 10% of patients experience unpleasant side effects, all of them transient.1517

As with any imaging examination, the patient must remain still. In some cases sedation will be required to achieve this. Bone artifacts, which impair CT imaging of areas very near bone, can be reduced by correct angulation of the patient's head.

There are several advantages of this technique over other methods of imaging CBF. Stable xenon gas is not radioactive, so the only radiation exposure is that required for the CT scan itself. This means radiation exposure is limited to the most radiation-resistant areas of the body. With other methods, a radioactive tracer is injected, so the entire body is exposed. The image resolution is good, and there is direct anatomic correlation with the baseline CT scan. The study can be repeated in 15 minutes, after xenon gas is eliminated from the body by breathing room air. Thus, it is possible to perform sequential studies with the patient in different states (i.e., after administration of a drug challenge). It is important also to note that the technique is inexpensive (the additional cost per study is less than $100), fast (it adds only 10 to 15 minutes to a routine CT exam), and a billable procedure when considered medically necessary.15,18

In the case presented here, the patient failed to respond to therapy based on working diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and major depression. Neuropsychological testing was done, leading to the suspicion of cerebrovascular disease or stroke with bilateral hemispheric involvement. Neither CT nor MR imaging of the brain could explain the clinical deficits. The finding of decreased CBF on the Xe/CT examination was consistent with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). As a result of this finding, the diagnoses changed from probable Alzheimer's disease and major depression to dementia secondary to CVA. The psychiatric day treatment program and donepezil administration were discontinued. Patient and family education focusing on poststroke management was initiated. In a study by Velakoulis and Lloyd,10 the functional imaging finding of altered CBF changed the clinical management in almost 10% of the patients. Thus, availability of CBF imaging can have an impact on clinical management in a significant number of patients presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms.

A Axial computed tomographic image from a 78-year-old male who presented with a 2-year history of alterations in cognition and behavior, including difficulty with short-term memory, oral comprehension, oral expression, and concentration in addition to apathy, social withdrawal, decreased initiative, and episodic confusion. His medical history included persistent headaches following a motor vehicle accident 10 years earlier, worsening 2 years ago. Neurological evaluation that included EEG, CT, and MRI was negative (except for mild enlargement of the left lateral ventricle compared with the right). Neuropsychological testing found a severe constructional dyspraxia, particularly significant in that premorbidly the patient was noted for his ability to work from blueprints and build anything from measurements.

B Companion axial xenon-enhanced computed tomographic image showing reduced cerebral blood flow in the right posterior temporal lobe (arrows, inferior parietal lobule) consistent with the patient's severe constructional dyspraxia. The color scale directly represents cerebral blood flow (ml/100 g brain/min). Normal cortical gray matter has a mean flow of about 80 ml/100 g/min (high flow rates displayed as light yellow and orange), and white matter has a mean flow of about 20 ml/100 g/min (low flow rates displayed as dark blue and purple). Areas containing both gray and white matter have a mean flow of 40–60 ml/100 g/min (moderate flow rates displayed as green and blue).1

From the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Radiology, and the Herbert J. Frensley Center for Imaging Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Psychiatry Service, Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas; and the Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Address correspondence to Dr. Hurley, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030–3498; e-mail:
References

1 Yonas H, Darby JM, Marks EC, et al: CBF measured by Xe-CT: approach to analysis and normal values. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11:716–725Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Weight DG, Bigler ED: Neuroimaging in psychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1998; 21:725–759Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Wahlund LO, Agartz I, Saaf J, et al: MRI in psychiatry:731 cases. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 1992; 45:139–140Google Scholar

4 Bryan RN, Levy LM, Whitlow WD, et al: Diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of CT and MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12:611–620MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Lindgren A, Norrving B, Rudling O, et al: Comparison of clinical and neuroradiological findings in first-ever stroke: a population-based study. Stroke 1994; 25:1371–1377Google Scholar

6 Mohr JP, Biller J, Hilal SK, et al: Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke. Stroke 1995; 26:807–812Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Sinnatamby R, Antoun NA, Freer CE, et al: Neuroradiological findings in primary progressive aphasia: CT, MRI and cerebral perfusion SPECT. Neuroradiology 1996; 38:232–238Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Kao CH, Ho YJ, Lan JL, et al: Discrepancy between regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism of the brain in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with normal brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:61–68Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Alberts MJ, Faulstich ME, Gray L: Stroke with negative brain magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 1992; 23:663–667Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Velakoulis D, Lloyd JH: The role of SPECT scanning in a neuropsychiatry unit. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1998; 32:511–522Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Meyer JS, Muramatsu K, Mortel KF, et al: Prospective CT confirms differences between vascular and Alzheimer's dementia. Stroke 1995; 26:735–742Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Sabri O, Ringelstein EB, Hellwig D, et al: Neuropsychological impairment correlates with hypoperfusion and hypometabolism but not with severity of white matter lesions on MRI in patients with cerebral microangiopathy. Stroke 1999; 30:556–566Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Kashiwagi S, Nagamitsu T, Yamashita T: Current status and controversies in the inhalation protocols for the xenon CT CBF method. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1996; 166:51–53Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Yonas H, Johnson DW, Pindzola, RP: Xenon-enhanced CT of cerebral blood flow. Sci Am Sci Med 1995; 2(5)58–67Google Scholar

15 Yonas H, Pindzola RP, Johnson DW: Xenon/computed tomography cerebral blood flow and its use in clinical management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1996; 7:605–616Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 Fang H, Xu J-X, Zhang Z-M: Adverse reaction to xenon-enhanced CT cerebral blood flow measurement (abstract). Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1996; 166:50CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17 Holl K, Becker H, Haubitz B: Effect of xenon. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1996; 166:38–41Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Pindzola RR, Yonas H: The xenon-enhanced computed tomography cerebral blood flow method. Neurosurgery 1998; 43:1488–1492Google Scholar