Association of Preoperative Symptom Profile With Psychiatric Symptoms Following Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
METHODS
Patients
The study population consisted of 25 patients with early- and late-onset idiopathic Parkinson’s disease according to the U.K. Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria. 26 Patients were referred for surgery because of severe disability despite optimized dopaminergic therapy, including severe “off” state parkinsonism, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias. Patients were excluded for surgery, as accepted, if they had other unstable medical or neurological problems, active psychiatric symptoms, or prominent cognitive decline. Most patients underwent surgery in centers outside of Israel (n=13). Implanted patients were then followed up at our center during data collection. Two patients were excluded from the study due to language limitations and one patient due to missing data. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . All patients included in the study provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board.
 |
Patient Evaluation
The medical charts of the remaining 22 patients were reviewed for demographic data, clinical aspects of Parkinson’s disease, pharmacotherapy, and stimulation parameters. The patients and their caregivers were interviewed by a neurologist (OSC or SH) or a psychologist (OP) in person and by telephone using clinician and patient rating scales. They were asked to rate several aspects of behavior of the patients during the 3 months before the present assessment and retrospectively for the 3 months preceding the STN-DBS operation.
The patient’s interview included the following tests:
The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale
The 27-item Neurobehavioral Rating Scale 27 is an observer-rated instrument for a broad range of cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral disturbances in patients with various neurological conditions which measures seven domains, namely: cognitive impairment, agitation, retardation, depression, apathy, psychosis and lability. The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale showed high interrater reliability (Spearman’s correlation coefficient =0.93, p<0.001) 28 and satisfactory convergent validity with other cognitive and behavioral measures in patients with Parkinson’s disease in its modified version. 29
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 30 was originally designed to measure behavioral changes in patients with schizophrenia but has been widely used as a rating scale in clinical trials for antipsychotic agents in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Interrater reliabilities (Pearson coefficients) vary from 0.63 to more than 0.80, and correlations with measures of positive and negative symptoms (concurrent validity) are adequate (0.92 and 0.82, respectively). 31 The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale has a suicide subscale that was added for the patient assessment (by the clinician) since it was absent in the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale.
The Beck Depression Inventory
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 32 is a commonly used and well validated self-rating scale for depression in Parkinson’s disease. 33 Cronbach alpha for the BDI in Parkinson’s disease is high (0.88), and a cutoff of 14/15 was calculated for patients with Parkinson’s disease showing the highest sensitivity (0.71) and specificity (0.90). 34
The caregiver’s interview included the following tests:
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory 35 is designed primarily to assess psychopathology in patients with dementia, assessing severity (of delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, abnormal motor output) and the resulting caregiver’s distress from each of the symptoms measured. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.87–0.88) with an interrater agreement of 90%–100%. Concurrent validity was established with a correlation of 0.66 for frequency and 0.71 for severity of symptoms to other measures of behavior in dementia. 35
Assessing the Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome
Three questions were formulized according to the principles laid down by previous authors. 36 The questions to the caregiver were phrased “During the 3 months that preceded the deep brain stimulation operation, how severe was the need of the patient for (a) sexual activity, (b) exaggerated consumption of food, and (c) compulsive behavior such as gambling, drug hoarding, shopping and spending money?” Scores ranged from 0 (none) to 4 (a permanent and devastating need).
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale 37 is a measure of disability, functional impairment at work, home, leisure and personal relationships. Psychometric properties have been tested in populations suffering from a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression, OCD, phobias and additional health conditions. 38 , 39 The authors showed internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of 0.70–0.94, test-retest reliability of 0.73, interrater reliability of 0.86, and concurrent validity with depression scores of 0.76. 37
In order to identify risk factors for behavioral worsening following STN-DBS we used a Clinical Global Impression scale. 40 This is a seven-point categorical scale that provides a single global rating of change from baseline (1=marked improvement, 2=moderate improvement, 3=minimal improvement, 4=no change, 5=minimal worsening, 6=moderate worsening, 7=marked worsening). Any change recorded on a Clinical Global Impression scale was considered clinically relevant by definition. Although it has a moderate interrater reliability (0.41–0.66), the scale has been used in several large randomized Parkinson’s disease psychosis clinical trials and appears to be sensitive to change. 31
The same investigator throughout the study made the Clinical Global Impression scale assessments for a given patient, and all assessments were done at approximately the same time of day for all visits.
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale was used in the present study to divide the patients into two behavioral outcome groups (CGI-Behavior): those graded 1 (marked improvement) to 4 (no change) were assigned to the “stable/improved” group and those with scores of 5 (minimal worsening) to 7 (marked worsening) to the “worsened” group. The two groups (n=11 each) were then compared for preoperative behavioral status, disease characteristics, stimulation parameters, medication changes after deep brain stimulation and demographic variables. As most patients were operated on outside Israel, uniform and formal rating of their motor status before the operation was missing. In order to assess the motor benefit they obtained from STN-DBS, we used a Clinical Global Impression scale for motor improvement (CGI-Motor) rated by the same neurologist after a thorough interview with the patient and caregiver while examining the medical records.
Statistical Analysis
We used a matched pair, before and after design to evaluate the impact of STN-DBS on the behavioral and psychiatric profile of the patients. Using the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the BDI, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale scales, and the dopamine dysregulation syndrome scores, we measured changes in behavioral functioning of the total group by comparing their ratings before the operation and during the last 3 months. The McNemar test was computed to assess the difference between the proportions of behavioral and psychiatric complications in patients before and after the deep brain stimulation operation. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test for paired samples was used to compare the scores of the different rating scales pre- and postoperatively, and the Spearman correlations were used for nonparametric data, namely the depression rating of the patients and their caregivers before and after STN-DBS.
To compute effect size estimates for the nonparametric tests conducted, the raw data were transformed into rank values for which the eta squared statistic (η 2 ) was calculated.
Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the two outcome groups were performed with nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables as well as Phi and Cramer’s V tests. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviations or median (25th percentile–75th percentile). Discrete data were given as counts and percentages. Fisher’s exact tests were applied to assess the relation between the preoperative behavioral scores (Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BDI, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale scales, and the dopamine dysregulation syndrome scores) and the behavioral outcome. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate the relation between the motor (CGI-Motor) and behavioral (CGI-Behavior) outcomes.
RESULTS
Twenty-two patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with STN-DBS were included. The group characteristics are given in Table 1 . According to the CGI-Motor score, 12 patients (50%) scored 1 (very much improved), six patients scored 2 (much improved), one patient scored 4 (no change), and one scored 5 (minimal worsening). The mean CGI-Motor score was 1.86±1.125.
Total Work and Social Adjustment Scale scores ranged from 21.0±12.2 before the operation to 19.5±14.1 during assessment (out of a maximum of 40 points), indicating that social and work functioning was moderately impaired before and remained the same after STN-DBS (p values of all five subscales of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale were not significant for the McNemar test).
Total group severity measures of behavioral symptoms are compared for before and after the operation in Table 2 .
 |
Further analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory item scores of the whole group before and after STN-DBS, showed a significant increase of apathy (p=0.020, η 2 =0.25) and anxiety (p=0.039, η 2 =0.19). There was no evidence of an overall increase in depression (p=0.959) using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.
No correlation was found between the severity of depressive symptoms before and after the operation when looking at the ratings of preoperative caregiver’s Neuropsychiatric Inventory severity scale and the present BDI score given by the patient (Spearman’s ρ=0.346, not significant).
Based on the caregiver’s impression given by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the predominant behavioral disturbances before STN-DBS were symptoms of depression (12 cases), followed by nighttime behaviors (10 cases), irritability or lability (nine cases) and then agitation, anxiety and apathy (seven cases each). A few cases of changes in appetite (four), disinhibition (two), delusions (one), and motor disturbances (one) were also reported. According to the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the symptoms that appeared anew in highest frequency were apathy and anxiety (five cases) followed by hallucinations and appetite changes (four cases), depression, delusions and nighttime behaviors (three new cases each). The percentage of patients reporting dopamine dysregulation syndrome symptoms (score >1) changed from 20% to 36%, p=0.009 (η 2 =0.31).
Depressive symptoms had resolved in four patients and anxiety in one. Suicidal ideation as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale was evident in three patients before the operation and was reported in seven new patients after the operation, a total of nine patients (p=0.046, η 2 =0.18). One of the patients, a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease for 10 years, was apparently suicidal before the operation, but did not share this information with the medical personnel. This patient had performed an unsuccessful suicide attempt 1 month after surgery and was admitted to a psychiatric ward for a short hospitalization. Two months later he accomplished suicide. His motor condition following STN-DBS had much improved (CGI-Motor=2) while his behavioral condition had worsened significantly during postsurgical assessment (CGI-Behavior=6). According to his wife he was severely depressed and agitated before the operation (Neuropsychiatric Inventory depression severity=3, agitation severity=3), but he himself reported only mild depression (BDI score=14).
When comparing the two behavioral outcome groups, no significant differences were found in terms of gender, age at assessment, age at disease onset or age at the time of surgery. However, the disease duration was significantly shorter for the patients who had deteriorated behaviorally compared to those who were stable or improved (11 [11–14.5] versus 18 [13–21], p=0.047; η 2 =0.19) ( Table 3 ). Concordantly, there was a trend for a shorter time from the onset of Parkinson’s disease to surgery for the “worsened” group compared with the “stable/improved” group. No differences were found in the average reduction of L -dopa or L -dopa equivalent dose following the operation or in stimulation parameters ( Table 3 ). There was also no correlation between the motor (CGI-Motor) and behavioral (CGI-Behavior) outcomes (ρ=0.231, p=0.3). The preoperative behavioral scores (according to the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, the BDI, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Work and Social Adjustment Scale and items addressing the dopamine dysregulation syndrome) were similar for both groups. Patients in the behaviorally deteriorated group were found to have a lower incidence of aggression or agitation (Neuropsychiatric Inventory caregivers’ ratings) prior to operation (45.5% versus 90.9%, p=0.032; Phi & Cramer’s V=0.628) ( Table 3 ).
 |
DISCUSSION
In our group of patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with STN-DBS, several behavioral symptoms worsened in terms of prevalence and severity and previously asymptomatic patients became affected. Behavioral features varied, and were not clustered around depression, anxiety, psychosis, or impulse control disorders (dopamine dysregulation syndrome). Apathy, anxiety, and suicidal ideation increased significantly after the operation, while depressive symptoms appeared stable. The worsening of the behavioral symptoms and the social adjustment of the patients were dissociated from the improvement in motor disability, as pointed out in other studies. 19 , 24 , 41 Similarly, no correlation was found between the motor and the behavioral outcome (Clinical Global Impression scale).
Previous studies including short and long term follow-up of patients after STN-DBS implantation generally support the safety of this procedure 4 , 7 and report much lower rates of acute and long term behavioral adverse events. 10 – 11 , 17 – 19 The high incidence of behavioral symptoms in our STN-DBS patients may reflect the sensitivity of the various tools we chose and the information obtained from the caregivers. It should be kept in mind that behavioral symptoms were reported with rating scales and not by standard DSM-IV criteria, 42 thus reflecting patients’ complaints, not diagnosis.
Behavioral deterioration following STN-DBS was not associated with gender, age or other demographic features except for a finding that the patients who worsened behaviorally following STN-DBS had significantly shorter disease duration and were admitted to this treatment earlier in the course of their disease. One possible explanation for this finding is that in those patients the rate of disease progression was more rapid up to a point of severe disability, necessitating earlier surgical intervention. Thus the prominent psychiatric complications may reflect a more aggressive nature of their illness, resulting in a more intense neuronal loss both in the “motor” and the “complex” dopaminergic pathways. 43 This rapid neurodegeneration may prominently contribute to both motor and nonmotor aspects of the disease. 44
A disappointing finding is that preoperative behavioral symptoms did not differ between the outcome groups, did not correlate with postoperative scores, and thus cannot serve as predictors or warning signs for these unwanted behavioral outcomes.
According to previous reports, an association may be found between changes in medication after STN-DBS and depression or apathy, 23 but we found similar dose adjustments in both groups. Acute and long-term mood and behavior changes were previously reported to be induced by stimulation. 13 , 45 However, we found no differences between the groups in the stimulation parameters. We had no data concerning the exact location of the electrodes within and relative to the subthalamic nucleus, therefore these data could not be analyzed.
This study has several limitations. As a retrospective study, there could be a limited reliability of the behavioral data concerning the time before the operation. Quantitative motor assessments before and after STN-DBS supporting the positive motor outcome are lacking. There is variability in surgical indications, surgical procedures, and time from surgery to assessment within the patient population. As neuropsychiatric and neurobehavioral rating scales were used rather than semistructured psychiatric interviews, formal psychiatric diagnoses are lacking and this limits our ability to generalize these findings. 46 The absence of a non-surgical Parkinson’s disease control group limits our ability to assess the impact of STN-DBS on the natural course of Parkinson’s disease and its nonmotor, neuropsychiatric complications. Lastly, the small sample size of the study may result in low statistical power and Type II errors.
The overall success of STN-DBS in Parkinson’s disease depends on a general patient outcome, including motor, behavioral, and social aspects. It is therefore of great importance to find tools for identifying patients at risk for deterioration. 6 , 25 While selection criteria for STN-DBS have been previously defined, 47 predictors of a safe behavioral outcome are still lacking. Risk factors for behavioral deterioration have not yet been determined and, at present, only patients with a notable cognitive decline or active psychiatric symptoms such as depression or psychosis are generally ruled out for surgery until treated and improved.
As has been reported in other studies, one patient in this study accomplished suicide despite having improvement in motoric symptoms. It should be emphasized that in our sample there was a very high rate of postoperative suicidal ideation (9 of 22 or 44% of all patients) and that despite no overall worsening in total depressive symptoms of previously nonsuicidal patients, seven of 19 (37%) developed suicidal ideation postoperatively.
Since motor outcome and preoperative psychiatric symptoms do not correlate with postoperative psychiatric complications and given the high rate of postoperative suicidal ideation with no clear predictive factors, it is essential that all patients be routinely evaluated and closely followed for suicidality. This can be done using a thorough assessment of suicidal symptoms by a psychiatrist before the operation as a part of the selection process. The use of sensitive rating scales as well as structured clinical interviews is also preferable. Patients who develop suicidal symptoms following implantation should be closely monitored by a psychiatrist and treated promptly.
Future studies should aim at understanding the causes for emergence of behavioral symptoms in patients with STN-DBS and finding ways to prevent them.
1. Gómez-Esteban JC, Zarranz JJ, Lezcano E, et al: Influence of motor symptoms upon the quality of life of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur Neurol 2007; 57:161–165Google Scholar
2. Deuschl, G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, et al: A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:896–908Google Scholar
3. Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, et al: Five year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1925–1934Google Scholar
4. Gan J, Xie-Brustolin J, Mertens P, et al: Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease: 3 years follow-up. J Neurol 2007; 254:99–106Google Scholar
5. Woods SP, Fields JA, Troster AI: Neuropsychological sequelae of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a critical review. Neuropsychological Reviews 2002; 12:111–126Google Scholar
6. Voon V, Kubu C, Krack P, et al: Deep brain stimulation: neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric issues. Mov Disord 2006; 21(suppl 14):S305–327Google Scholar
7. Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Obeso JA, Lang AE, et al: Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter study with 4 years follow-up. Brain 2005; 128:2240–2249Google Scholar
8. Doshi PK, Chhaya N, Bhatt MH: Depression leading to attempted suicide after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002; 17:1084–1100Google Scholar
9. Berney A, Vingerhoets F, Perrin A, et al: Effect on mood of subthalamic DBS for Parkinson’s disease: a consecutive series of 24 patients. Neurology 2002; 59:1427–1429Google Scholar
10. Temel Y, Kessels A, Tan S, et al: Behavioral changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006; 12:265–272Google Scholar
11. Kleiner-Fisman G, Herzog J, Fisman DN, et al: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: summary and meta-analysis of outcomes. Mov Disord 2006; 21(suppl 14):S290–304Google Scholar
12. Drapier D, Drapier S, Sauleau P, et al: Does subthalamic nucleus stimulation induce apathy in Parkinson’s disease? J Neurol 2006; 253:1081–1093Google Scholar
13. Funkiewiez A, Ardouin C, Caputo E, et al: Long term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on cognitive function, mood, and behavior in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:834–839Google Scholar
14. Houeto JL, Mesnage V, Mallet L, et al: Behavioral disorders, Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72:701–707Google Scholar
15. Romito LM, Raja M, Daniele A, et al: Transient mania with hypersexuality after surgery for high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002; 17:1371–1374Google Scholar
16. Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets FJ, Berney A, et al: Suicide after successful deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurology 2004; 63:2170–2172Google Scholar
17. Seijo FJ, Alvarez-Vega MA, Gutierrez JC, et al: Complications in subthalamic nucleus stimulation surgery for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: review of 272 procedures. Acta Neurochirurgica 2007; 149:867–875Google Scholar
18. Kenney C, Simpson R, Hunter C, et al: Short-term and long-term safety of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 2007; 106:621–625Google Scholar
19. Houeto JL, Mallet L, Mesnage V, et al: Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: behavior and social adaptation. Arch Neurol 2006; 63:1090–1095Google Scholar
20. Bejjani BP, Damier P, Arnulf I, et al: Brief Report: transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1476–1480Google Scholar
21. Krack P, Kumar R, Ardouin C, et al: Mirthful laughter induced by subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Mov Disord 2001; 16:867–875Google Scholar
22. Volkmann J, Allert N, Voges J, et al: Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced PD. Neurology 2001; 56:548–551Google Scholar
23. Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, et al: Postoperative management of subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002; 17:S188–S197Google Scholar
24. Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, Welter ML, et al: Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology 2006; 66:1811–1816Google Scholar
25. Saint-Cyr JA, Albanese A: STN DBS in PD: selection criteria for surgery should include cognitive and psychiatric factors. Neurology 2006; 66:1799–1800Google Scholar
26. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, et al: Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:181–184Google Scholar
27. Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, et al: The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale: assessment of the behavioral sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50:183–193Google Scholar
28. Sultzer DL, Berisford, MA, Gunay I: The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale: reliability in patients with dementia. J Psychiatr Res 1995; 29:185–191Google Scholar
29. Mathias JL: Neurobehavioral functioning of persons with Parkinson’s disease. Appl Neuropsychol 2003; 10:57–68Google Scholar
30. Overall JE, Gorham DR: The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10:799–812Google Scholar
31. Fernandez HH, Aarsland D, Fénelon G, et al: Scales to assess psychosis in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations (The Movement Disorders Society’s Task Force Report on Rating Scales in Parkinson’s Disease). Mov Disord 2008; 23:484–500Google Scholar
32. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561–571Google Scholar
33. Leentjens AFG, Verhey FRJ, Luijckx G, et al: The validity of the Beck Depression Inventory as a screening and diagnostic instrument for depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2000; 15:1221–1224Google Scholar
34. Visser M, Leentjens AF, Marinus J, et al: Reliability and validity of the Beck Depression Inventory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006; 21:668–672Google Scholar
35. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994; 44:2308–2314Google Scholar
36. Giovannoni G, O’Sullivan JD, Turner K, et al: Hedonistic homeostatic dysregulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease on dopamine replacement therapies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68:423–428Google Scholar
37. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al: The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180:461–464Google Scholar
38. Mataix-Cols D, Cowley AJ, Hankins M, et al: Reliability and validity of the work and social adjustment scale in phobic disorders. Compr Psychiatry 2005; 46:223–228Google Scholar
39. Mclaughlin TJ, Aupont O, Bambauer KZ, et al: Improving psychologic adjustment to chronic illness in cardiac patients. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20:1084–1090Google Scholar
40. Guy W: Clinical global impressions, in ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised (DHEW Publication No. ADM 76–338). Bethesda, Md, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976, pp 217–222Google Scholar
41. Perriol MP, Krystkowiak P, Defebvre L, et al: Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: cognitive and affective changes are not linked to the motor outcome. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006; 12:205–210Google Scholar
42. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1994Google Scholar
43. Cummings JL: Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Arch Neurol 1993; 50:873–880Google Scholar
44. Katzen HL, Levin BE, Weiner W: Side and type of motor symptom influence cognition in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006; 21:1947–1953Google Scholar
45. Funkiewiez A, Ardouin C, Krack P, et al: Acute psychotropic effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and L -dopa in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003; 18:524–530 Google Scholar
46. Lieb K, Schlaepfer TE, Deuschl G, et al: Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease (The Authors Reply). N Engl J Med 2006: 355:2256Google Scholar
47. Moro E, Lang AE: Criteria for deep-brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: review and analysis. Expert Rev Neurother 2006; 6:1695–1705Google Scholar
