Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Bipolar Disorder
TMS affects neural activity at the site of stimulation and in distal regions that are interconnected and are implicated in mood disorders, such as the striatum, thalamus, and anterior cingulate cortex.3 Imaging studies of mood disorders point to dysfunction of the limbic and prefrontal cortex activity.1 Depression syndromes may be associated with low cortical activity (blood flow and metabolism), particularly on the left side, with relative increase on the right side.1 On the basis of results of unipolar depression studies, it has been hypothesized that left-sided dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation via TMS-induced neuronal depolarization may change brain activity and improve mood.3 although the anatomo-pathophysiology of bipolar disorder may be somewhat different, affecting right- as well as left-sided systems, few studies have examined the therapeutic effects of TMS in bipolar depression. We searched the database of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect for reports concerning the TMS use in bipolar disorder. Our search yielded only 10 published papers.4–13 There were five studies in bipolar depressed patients (total n: 66) and five studies in manic patients (total n: 74). These studies suggest the efficacy of TMS as an augmenting treatment during the acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar depression. Evidence concerning TMS benefits in bipolar depression as a monotherapy and in mania is conflicting. There are many methodological considerations that limit interpretation of this early bipolar TMS literature. These include the small number of patients, unequal randomization, lack of sham control, and differences in clinical features and treatment history. Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and symptom assessment methods differed across the reports. It has been hypothesized that TMS could be effective in bipolar depression by stimulating the left prefrontal cortex or inhibiting the right prefrontal cortex.11 It has been proposed that in bipolar mania there is decreased cortical activity in the right side, with a relative increase in left-sided activity.12 Moreover, TMS might have therapeutic effects in mania when the right prefrontal cortex is stimulated.12 It has been thought that high-frequency (>1 Hz) TMS induces cortical excitation, whereas low-frequency (<1 Hz) causes cortical inhibition.14 TMS appears to be relatively safe and well tolerated. There is no post-procedure recovery period and no risk of anesthesia.3,15 The most common side effects are headaches and pain at the site of the stimulation.3 The estimated risk of TMS-induced seizures and memory impairment is reportedly low.3,15 There are conflicting findings regarding TMS-induced mania. Three studies did not report a statistically significant increase in manic symptom ratings in bipolar depressed patients during TMS.(5,7,8) However, induction of hypomania and mania has been reported in healthy volunteers and in unipolar and bipolar depressed patients.16 In summary, data on the safety and efficacy of TMS in bipolar disorder are preliminary but intriguing. They support the need to focus on such patients in exploratory studies and in adequately powered confirmatory studies.
1. : Pathophysiology, in Manic-Depressive Illness, 2nd Edition. Edited by Goodwin FKJamison KR. London, UK, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp 411–698Google Scholar
2. : Barriers to the effective management of bipolar disorder: a survey of psychiatrists based in the U.K. and U.S.A. Bipolar Disord 2005; 7(Suppl 1):38–42Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
3. : Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Curr Psychiatry Reports 2009; 11:447–452Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4. : Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with bipolar depression: a double blind, controlled study. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4(supp 1):94–95Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
5. : Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression in bipolar affective disorder: a pilot study of acute safety and efficacy. Bipolar Disord 2003; 5:40–47Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
6. : Can left prefrontal rTMS be used as maintenance treatment for bipolar depression? Depress Anx 2004; 20:98–100Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
7. : Stimulating research: a prospective, randomized, double blind, sham controlled study of slow transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressed bipolar patients. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2007; 19:198–199Link, Google Scholar
8. : Augmentative repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in drug-resistant bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord 2009; 11:76–81Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
9. : Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mania: a controlled study, Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1608–1610Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
10. : Right prefrontal TMS versus sham treatment of mania: a controlled study. Bipolar Disord 2003; 5:36–39Crossref, Google Scholar
11. : Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on therapy in the treatment of mania: a case series of eight patients. Psychiatr Res 2004; 128:199–202Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12. : Efficacy of high-frequency suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation of right prefrontal cortex in bipolar mania: a randomized sham-controlled study. J Affect Disord 2009; 117:146–150Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
13. : Treatment of bipolar mania with right prefrontal rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Affect Disord 2004; 78:253–257Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
14. : Applications of TMS to therapy in psychiatry. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19:344–360Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15. : Safety of TMS Consensus Group: Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120:2008–2039Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16. : Treatment-emergent mania in unipolar and bipolar depression: focus on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11:119–130Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar