The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

L ipoid proteinosis, also known as Hyalinosis cutis et mucosae or Urbach-Wiethe Disease, is a rare hereditary disorder transmitted by an autosomal recessive gene. 12 From the time Urbach and Wiethe 3 gave the first clear description of the disease, a cumulative total of 250 1 to 300 cases 46 have been reported in the literature. The disorder is a systemic illness characterized by depositions of storage material in the mucous membranes. 4 , 711 The most classic symptoms are hoarseness of speech, often from birth or infancy, 7 , 12 and skin lesions. 1214 There is considerable clinical variability among lipoid proteinosis subjects 2 and lesions may increase in severity and extent with age. 15 The most consistent clinical features for a diagnosis have been a hoarse voice and a thickened sublingual frenulum leading to restricted tongue movement. 2

Bilateral, circumscribed, and symmetrical calcification in the medial temporal regions are common 4 , 9 , 1617 and are associated with neuropsychiatric sequelea including seizure disorder 9 , 16 , 18 and psychotic symptoms. 6 , 1920 Medial temporal regions encompass the amygdala and studies on patients with lipoid proteinosis contributed to our understanding of the role of the amygdala in fear processing and social cognition. 17 , 2126 The lipoid proteinosis subjects of Adolphs et al. 21 and Calder and Young 27 showed significant impairment in recognizing fearful expressions, although individual performances ranged from severely impaired to essentially normal. In addition, while most subjects were impaired in recognizing other negative expressions in addition to fear, they were not impaired in recognizing happy expressions. Lipoid proteinosis has been associated with difficulty in coping with emotionally loaded memory 28 , 29 and impaired executive control over social behavior. 17

There has, however, been significant variability in neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological findings across studies. In some studies there has been no evidence of psychiatric symptomatology. 3032 Siebert et al. 28 studied 10 people with lipoid proteinosis, six with bilateral calcification of the amygdaloid complex, and did not find that lipoid proteinosis necessarily impaired the recognition of basic emotions such as fear and anger. Lipoid proteinosis has been associated with both intact intelligence 9 , 17 , 20 , 30 , 33 and mental retardation. 14 , 16 , 3436

While there is true heterogeneity within the lipoid proteinosis population, 2 which may represent a variable and slowly progressive degenerative process in the brain, 28 some of the variation across the studies may be explicable on the basis of relatively small sample sizes and other methodological problems (e.g., different methods of assessing symptomatology). The current study is, to our knowledge, the largest systematic study of psychiatric diagnosis and neuropsychological measures in lipoid proteinosis. In view of evidence of amygdala pathology and prior findings of associated neuropsychiatric impairment, we hypothesized that this population would be characterized by increased rates of mood and anxiety disorders and impairments in processing emotional expressions.

METHOD

Thirty-four adult South African subjects with lipoid proteinosis (ages 17–63 years) participated in this study. Two were patients attending a large state hospital in Cape Town, five were from the greater Johannesburg, South Africa/Pretoria area, and 27 lived in the impoverished and rural Northern Cape. Forty-seven controls from the Northern Cape (matched for home language, socioeconomic status, age, and matched as closely as possible for years of education and gender) completed the same batteries. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital, and abided by the Helsinki, Finland, declaration guidelines of “good clinical practice.” All subjects gave informed consent. Six participants (two with lipoid proteinosis and four matched controls) were 17 years old and they and their guardians gave consent. Three children with lipoid proteinosis under 16 years were excluded from this study.

The diagnosis of lipoid proteinosis was established through genetic and clinical means. Subjects were examined by use of standardized neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological measures. The battery was designed to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms and neuropsychological dysfunction previously reported in the literature in association with lipoid proteinosis (e.g., psychosis, depression, problems with emotional recognition, and memory and executive functioning). Tests were not administered if the subjects were unable to complete them validly (e.g., due to psychosis or illiteracy). Subjects were assessed in their home language on the following neuropsychiatric measures: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI+), 37 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), 38 and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). 39 They were assessed on neuropsychological measures including the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) except for the vocabulary subtest. 40 This was substituted with the vocabulary subtest from the WAIS-III scaled score, using the Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa’s Afrikaans translation and adaptations for South Africa. 41 Two people with lipoid proteinosis had already completed the South African Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Revised (SAWAIS-R) and did not do the WASI. 42

Subjects were also assessed with the Benton Facial Recognition (short form) 43 and the Ekman Facial Emotional Recognition. 44 This test consists of 110 photographs of people displaying either a neutral expression or one of six emotions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, or disgust). Subjects must try and match one of the seven options to the expression they see. In addition, subjects were assessed with the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT); the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT); subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised, 45 including Logical Memory, translated into Afrikaans with the names changed to local geographical settings (e.g., Okiep instead of Boston); Complex Figure of Rey (Copy and Immediate Incidental Recall); draw a clock; Hooper Visual Organization Task; Trail Making Tests A and B; and the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

Statistical Analysis

As exemplified in the Table 1 vignettes, the Northern Cape subjects differed significantly from the non-Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis patients on a number of demographic parameters (i.e., years of education, level of employment). Thus non- Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects were excluded from further neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological analyses. Data from Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects and controls were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) when normally distributed and with Mann-Whitney analyses when not normally distributed. Significance was set at p<0.05.

TABLE 1. Vignettes
TABLE 1. Vignettes
Enlarge table

RESULTS

In the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group (N=27), there were 12 males (44.4%) and 15 females (55.6%) ( Table 2 ). The mean age was 36.89 years (SD=14.0), the mean education was 8.37 years (SD=3.2), and less than 12% were in full-time employment. The Northern Cape control group had 20 males (42.6%) and 27 females (57.4%), with a mean age of 36.51 years (SD=14.2) and a mean education of 8.94 years (SD=2.93), and 10.6% were in full-time employment. Twenty-seven percent (27%) of the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group reported seizures.

TABLE 2. Demographics (Matching Gender, Age, and Education)
TABLE 2. Demographics (Matching Gender, Age, and Education)
Enlarge table

Neuropsychiatric diagnoses were compared in lipoid proteinosis subjects from the Northern Cape (N=27) and controls (N=47). In the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group, anxiety disorders (33%), mood disorders (33%), psychosis (22%), and schizophrenia (15%) were common ( Table 3 ), and in all cases significantly more prevalent than in the control group (p<0.01). Similarly, the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group was significantly more likely to have higher scores on the MADRS and on the negative symptoms scale of the PANSS. There was no significant difference between the groups for alcohol abuse (26% in both); 58% of lipoid proteinosis and 60% of control adult men abused alcohol (MINI+). Adults with lipoid proteinosis were significantly less likely to live with partners or to have children.

TABLE 3. Neuropsychiatric Diagnoses in Northern Cape Lipoid Proteinosis and Northern Cape Controls According to the MINI+
TABLE 3. Neuropsychiatric Diagnoses in Northern Cape Lipoid Proteinosis and Northern Cape Controls According to the MINI+
Enlarge table

The mean IQ for both the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects and the Northern Cape controls (including many educationally deprived participants) was markedly poorer than established norms ( Table 4 ). When comparing the lipoid proteinosis to the control subjects the following was evident: of the three WASI tests and Vocabulary test from the WAIS-III, only Similarities was significantly different between the two groups (controls significantly better than lipoid proteinosis subjects).

TABLE 4. Northern Cape Neuropsychology Tests: LiP versus Controls
TABLE 4. Northern Cape Neuropsychology Tests: LiP versus Controls
Enlarge table

Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects were significantly less likely to recognize correctly the emotional expressions—fear, anger, disgust, surprise, sadness, happiness and neutrality—than the matched Northern Cape controls ( Table 5 ). On basic face recognition, there were no significant differences on the Benton Facial Recognition Test, unless presented with less lighting or from a different angle. In terms of neuropsychological testing, there were no significant differences across Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects and controls for the two tests of language (COWAT and Vocabulary, WAIS-III). However, the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group scored significantly worse than controls on several tests of memory, including digits forward and backward, auditory new learning on RAVLT, retention after distraction, the recognition task, the number of repetitions in new learning, both immediate and delayed paragraph recall, as well as the percentage of the story that was retained, and delayed recall of the visual reproduction designs. There were no significant differences in either the forewarned or incidental immediate visual recall tasks ( Table 4 ).

TABLE 5. Emotional Recognition
TABLE 5. Emotional Recognition
Enlarge table

On selected executive tasks, there were no significant differences on tests of planning (draw a clock, copy of complex figure, WASI Matrices, or block design) between the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group and controls, although the Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis group did significantly worse on visual organization ( Table 4 ). However, for tasks of design fluency, switching and dual sequencing, and abstract thinking, the control group performed significantly better. Thus, controls performed significantly better than Northern Cape lipoid proteinosis subjects on memory and specific executive abilities (design initiation, switching, visual organization, and abstract thinking), but language tasks and other executive skills (planning) appeared unaffected by lipoid proteinosis.

DISCUSSION

These findings represent the largest report to date of neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological data in people with lipoid proteinosis. Compared with controls, a sample of people with lipoid proteinosis in the Northern Cape had increased rates of mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders as well as greater symptom severity, a decreased ability to identify both positive and negative emotional expressions, and significant impairment on memory and executive (specifically design fluency, switching, and abstract thinking) functions. The findings here confirm many of the observations made in previous reports on neuropsychiatric symptoms and neuropsychological impairment in smaller groups of lipoid proteinosis subjects. 2127

A larger sample provides us with some additional information; for example, we were able to demonstrate that there is impairment not only in processing of negative emotions, but also in processing of positive emotions in lipoid proteinosis. It can be hypothesized that such deficits have a significant impact on functioning in lipoid proteinosis. Nevertheless, we noted that the people with lipoid proteinosis were able to interact appropriately with us, possibly suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanisms. 28 However, the negative impact of impaired cognitive and affective processing may help explain why lipoid proteinosis patients were less likely to be living with partners and had fewer children than controls.

There are only occasional inconsistencies between our data and those reported previously. One report did not find memory or executive difficulties in lipoid proteinosis. 28 This may well reflect restriction of that sample to subjects with IQ predominantly in the average to above average ranges. Indeed, the overall picture of lipoid proteinosis described here is also consistent with previous findings of marked inter-individual variability within the lipoid proteinosis population, perhaps reflecting differences in extent of intracranial calcification in this condition 7 or in the extent of comorbid seizures (although we did not find significant differences in those with and without seizures).

It is also worth considering psychosocial contributors to variance in the data here. We noted significant difference in intelligence and education between lipoid proteinosis subjects living in the relatively impoverished Northern Cape and a smaller group who lived elsewhere. Indeed, notable findings here included the high prevalence of alcohol abuse and low neuropsychological performance of normal controls living in the Northern Cape. Much remains to be done in this setting in order to reverse current psychosocial circumstances and their negative impact on mental health.

The amygdala plays a key role in mediating emotional responses, 17 , 19 , 21 , 27 particularly those related to possible danger and threat. 2326 The amygdala is also important in the modulation of attention, perception, learning, and memory, 46 , 47 as well as in a number of different psychopathologies. 4853 The data here on neuropsychological dysfunction, as well as increased psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders, is consistent with temporal involvement and with the known high prevalence of temporal calcifications in lipoid proteinosis. 9 , 16 , 19 , 28 , 31 Patients in the current study live in remote rural areas and brain imaging was not available; such work could in the future shed more light on the findings here.

Received October 8, 2005; revised January 12, 2007; accepted January 18, 2007. Drs. Thornton and Stein are affiliated with the Departments of Psychiatry, University of Stellenbosch and University of Cape Town, South Africa. Dr. Nel is affiliated with the Centre for Statistical Consultation, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Dr.Thornton is affiliated with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California. Dr. van Honk is affiliated with the Helm Holtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Dr. Baker is affiliated with the Division of Neurosciences, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Address correspondence to Dr. Thornton, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X1, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa; [email protected] (e-mail).

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

References

1 . Hamada T, McLean WH, Ramsay M, et al: Lipoid proteinosis maps to 1q21 and is caused by mutations in the extracellular matrix protein 1 gene (EMC1). Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11:833–840Google Scholar

2 . Van Hougenhouck-Tulleken W, Chan I, Hamada T, et al: Clinical and molecular characterization of lipoid proteinosis in Namaqualand, South Africa. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151:413–423Google Scholar

3 . Urbach E, Wiethe C: Lipidosis cutis et mucosae. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med 1929; 273:285–319Google Scholar

4 . Aroni K, Lazaris AC, Papadimitriou K, et al: Lipoid proteinosis of the oral mucosa: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Res Pract 1998; 194:844–859Google Scholar

5 . Botha MC, Beighton P: Inherited disorders in the Afrikaner population in southern Africa, part II: skeletal, dermal and hematological conditions; the Afrikaners of Gamkaskloof; demographic considerations. S Afr Med J 1983; 64:664–667Google Scholar

6 . Cote DN: Head and neck manifestations of lipoid proteinosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 119:144–145Google Scholar

7 . Hofer P: Urbach-Wiethe disease (lipoglycoproteinosis; lipoid proteinosis; hyalinosis cutis et mucosae): a clinco-genetic study of 14 families from northern Sweden. Hereditas 1974; 77:209–218Google Scholar

8 . Costagliola C, Verolino M, Landolfo P, et al: Lipoid proteinosis (Urbach-Wiethe disease). Ophthalmologica 1999; 213:392–396Google Scholar

9 . Newton H, Rosenberg RN, Lampert PW, et al: Neurological involvement in Urbach-Wiethe’s disease (lipoid proteinosis). Neurology 1971; 21:1205–1213Google Scholar

10 . Caccamo D, Jaen A, Telenta M, et al: Lipoid proteinosis of the small bowel. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118:572–574Google Scholar

11 . Bazopoulou-Kyrkanidou E, Tosios KI, Zabelis G, et al: Case report: hyalinosis cutis et mucosae: gingival involvement. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27:233–237Google Scholar

12 . Desmet S, Devos SA, Chan I, et al: Clinical and molecular abnormalities in lipoid proteinosis. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15:344–346Google Scholar

13 . Chan I: The role of extracellular matrix protein 1 in human skin. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29:52–56Google Scholar

14 . Teive HA, Pereira ER, Zavala JA, et al: Generalized dystonia and striatal calcifications with lipoid proteinosis. Neurology 2004; 63:2168–2169Google Scholar

15 . Feiler-Ofry V, Lewy A, Regenbogen L, et al: Lipoid proteinosis (Urbach-Wiethe syndrome). Br J Ophthalmol 1979; 63:694–698Google Scholar

16 . Hofer PA: Urbach-Wiethe disease (lipoglycoproteinosis); lipoid proteinosis; hyalinosis et mucosae: a review. Acta Derm Venerol 1973; 53(suppl 71):1–52Google Scholar

17 . Tranel D, Hyman BT: Neuropsychological correlates of bilateral amygdala damage. Arch Neurol 1990; 47:349–355Google Scholar

18 . Heyl T: Lipoid proteinosis: the clinical picture. Br J Dermatol 1963; 75:465–472Google Scholar

19 . Emsley R, Pastor L: Lipoid proteinosis presenting with neuropsychiatric manifestations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48:1290–1292Google Scholar

20 . Kleinert R, Cervos-Navarro J, Kleinert G, et al: Predominantly cerebral manifestation in Urbach-Wiethe’s syndrome (lipoid proteinosis cutis et mucosae): a clinical and pathomorphological study. Clin Neuropathol 1987; 6:43–45Google Scholar

21 . Adolphs R, Tranel D, Hamann S, et al: Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:1111–1117Google Scholar

22 . Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al: Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science 1995; 269:1115–1118Google Scholar

23 . Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al: Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. J Neurosci 1996; 16:7678–7687Google Scholar

24 . Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al: Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature 1994; 372:669–672Google Scholar

25 . Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al: Fear and the human amygdala. J Neurosci 1995; 15:5879–5891Google Scholar

26 . Adolphs R, Tranel D: Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from scenes only when they contain facial expressions. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41:1281–1289Google Scholar

27 . Calder AJ, Young AW: Facial emotion recognition after bilateral amygdala damage: differently severe impairment of fear. Cogn Neuropsychology 1996; 13:699–745Google Scholar

28 . Siebert M, Markowitsch HJ, Bartel P: Amygdala, affect and cognition: evidence from 10 patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease. Brain 2003; 126:1–11Google Scholar

29 . Cahill L, Babinsky R, Markowitsch HJ, et al: The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature 1995; 377:295–296Google Scholar

30 . Van Rooy CH, Swart JG, Pietrzak JT: Lipoidproteinosis: a report of four cases. S Afr Med J 1991; 79:160–162 (Afrikaans)Google Scholar

31 . Hofer PA: Urbach-Wiethe disease (lipoglycoproteinosis; lipoid proteinosis; hyalinosis cutis et mucosae): a clinical-genetic study of 14 families from northern Sweden. Hereditas 1974; 7:209–218Google Scholar

32 . Botha P: Oral lipoid proteinosis. SADJ 1999; 54:371–373Google Scholar

33 . Özbek SS, Akyar S, Turgay M: Case report: computed tomography findings in lipoid proteinosis: report of two cases. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:207–209Google Scholar

34 . Böhme M, Wahlgren CF: Lipoid proteinosis in three children. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85:1003–1005Google Scholar

35 . Izaki M, Horiuchi T, Hozaki H: Lipoidosis cutis et mucosae (lipoid proteinosis Urbach-Wiethe): report of a case. Keio J Med 1954; 3:163–177Google Scholar

36 . Grosfeld JCM, Spaas J, Van de Staak WJBM, et al: Hyalinosis cutis et mucosae. Dermatologica (Basel) 1965; 130:239–266Google Scholar

37 . Sheehan D, Janavs J, Baker RM, et al: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory Plus. Tampa, University of South Florida, 2003Google Scholar

38 . Kay SR, Opler LA, Lindenmayer JP: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): rationale and standardisation. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155:59–65Google Scholar

39 . Montgomery SA, Asberg M: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134:382–389Google Scholar

40 . The Psychological Corporation: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence: Manual. San Antonio, TX, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1999Google Scholar

41 . Claasen NCW, Krynauw AH, Paterson H, et al: A Standardisation of the WAIS-III for English-Speaking South Africans. Pretoria, South Africa, Human Sciences Research Council, 2001Google Scholar

42 . Human Sciences Research Council: South African Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Johannesburg, South Africa, Human Sciences Research Council, 1983Google Scholar

43 . Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K de S, et al: Facial Recognition: Stimulus and Multiple Choice Pictures. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983Google Scholar

44 . Ekman P, Friesen WV: Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, Calif, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1976Google Scholar

45 . Wechsler D: Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised: Manual. San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corp., 1987Google Scholar

46 . Aggleton JP (ed): The Amygdala: A Functional Analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

47 . Baxter MG, Murray EA: The amygdala and reward. Neuroscience 2002; 3:563–573Google Scholar

48 . Baron-Cohen S: Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995Google Scholar

49 . Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Bullmore ET, et al: The amygdala theory of autism. Neurosci Behav Rev 2000; 24:355–364Google Scholar

50 . Fudge JL, Powers JM, Habner SN, et al: Considering the role of the amygdala in psychotic illness: a clinicopathological correlation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10:383–394Google Scholar

51 . Evangeli M, Broks P: Face processing in schizophrenia: parallels with the effects of amygdala damage. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2000; 5:81–105Google Scholar

52 . Sachdev P, Brodaty H, Cheang D: Hippocampus and amygdala volumes in elderly schizophrenic patients as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 54:105–113Google Scholar

53 . Haber SN, Fudge JL: The interface between dopamine neurones and the amygdala: implications for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1997; 23:471–482Google Scholar