Buprenorphine Does Not Aggrevate Ischemic Neuronal Injury in Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischemia

B uprenorphine hydrochloride is a partial mu opioid receptor agonist and a kappa opioid receptor antagonist. 1 Buprenorphine is commonly used as an analgesic in patients who have severe trauma or are suffering from cancer pain. 2 Though methadone and other pharmacotherapies are available, buprenorphine’s unique pharmacological property makes it well suited for maintenance treatment of opioid dependence.

However, available data suggest increased risk of cerebrovascular events in opioid-dependent patients. 3 – 6 In addition, focal neurological deficits have been reported to occur immediately following heroin injection and up to and beyond 24 hours after heroin abuse. Thus, an agent offering safety in regard to neurological function would be quite valuable for opioid-dependent patients. It has recently been shown that buprenorphine can cause some alterations on the opioid receptors in rat brain regions, 7 which are important indicators of infarct extension in ischemic neuronal damage. 8 Given these in vitro findings indicating the neurotoxic role of buprenorphine, we aim to test the hypothesis of whether buprenorphine is neurotoxic in vivo during cerebral ischemia.

METHOD

All experimental procedures were carried out with governmental approval according to local guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Adult male Wistar rats weighing 330 g to 370 g were assigned to the following experiments and groups: intraperitoneal administration of a) 2 mg/kg buprenorphine hydrochloride (Sigma) dissolved in saline (N=11 animals), b) 0.2 ml vehicle (0.09percnt; NaCl) (N=9 animals), starting at the onset of transient focal cerebral ischemia.

Induction of Ischemia

Animals were anesthesized with 4 vol% isoflurane (30% O ₂ , remainder N ₂ O). Rectal temperature was maintained between 36.5 and 37.0°C using a feedback-controlled heating system. During the experiments, cerebral blood flow was measured by Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) using a flexible fiber optic probe (Perimed, Stockholm), which was attached to the intact skull overlying the middle cerebral artery territory (1 mm posterior/5 mm lateral from bregma). Laser doppler flowmetry changes were monitored up to 90 minutes after the onset of ischemia. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced using an intraluminal filament technique. 9 A midline neck incision was made, and the common carotid artery (CCA) was temporarily closed with two microvascular clips (FE691, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). A 4–0 nylon monofilament (Ethilon; Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) coated with silicon resin (Xantopren, Bayer Dental, Osaka, Japan) was introduced through a small incision into the common carotid artery and advanced distal to the carotid bifurcation for transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. The filament was removed after 90 minutes,and the CCA incision was closed by single interrupted sutures,using a 10–0 silk suture. We discontinued anesthesia and placed animals into their home cages. Arterial blood gases, pH, hemoglobin, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were measured during ischemia and reperfusion.

Infarct Volume Measurements: Toluidine Blue Staining

The animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane 24 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion, and then decapitated. Brains were immersion-fixed in 3.8% buffered formaldehyde for 5 days and automatically processed for embedding in paraffin (Bavimed 2050Z2; Haska AG, Bern, Switzerland) through a series of ethanol baths (70–100%) into xylol and paraffin for over 21 hours. Serial coronal sections (10 μm thick, three brains per block) were cut at 1-mm intervals through the forebrain and stained with toluidine blue ( Figure 1a ). The boundaries of the infarcted cerebral cortex and neostriatum were marked by an unbiased observer and traced from a monitor (at 21x magnification) onto a digitizing tablet interfaced to an image analysis system (DiaSys Datalab; H. Meyer, Thöringen, Switzerland). The infarct volumes were calculated by numeric integration of the infarct areas on sequential slices without correction for edema.

Statistics

All values are given as means (SD). We compared differences between groups by using independent sample t tests. We considered p values <0.05 to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Laser Doppler Flow and Physiological Parameters

Laser Doppler flow values decreased to approximately 40% of preischemic levels immediately after thread insertion. After thread retraction, laser Doppler flowmetry values slightly increased above preischemic control levels. Again, no differences were detected between different animal groups ( Figure 2 ). Arterial blood gas parameters and pH were kept within the physiological range ( Table 1 ). The mean arterial blood pressure and the heart rate moved in a physiological range prior to the occlusion and 90 minutes after reperfusion, and there were no significant differences between animal groups.

Enlarge table

Infarct Size

We obtained reproducible brain infarcts in the 2 mg/kg of buprenorphine or 0.2 ml of vehicle treated groups ( Figure 1 ). Intraperitoneal administration of 2 mg/kg buprenorphine had no effect on the infarct volume compared with control animals ( Figure 1 ).

DISCUSSION

Buprenorphine has been in clinical use as an analgesic agent for several decades. It is increasingly used in maintenance therapy of opioid dependence. Opioid-dependent patients are at higher risk of cerebrovascular events and focal neurological deficits. 3 – 6 In vitro studies available to date strongly suggest neurotoxic effects of buprenorphine. 10 , 11 However, this in vivo study does not indicate neurotoxic effects of buprenorphine in focal cerebral ischemia model.

A broad spectrum of neuropathological changes has been encountered in the brains of heroin abusers. 3 These changes have been associated either with infections (either due to bacterial spread from bacterial endocarditis, mycoses, or from human immunodeficiency virus infection) or to the other complications resulting from hypoxic/ischemic injuries and related neuronal damage. However, thromboembolism, vasculitis, septic emboli, hypotension, and positional vascular compression are some of the mechanisms hypothesized for respiratory depression and stroke in heroin abusers. 3 Given that the infarct sizes between the buprenorphine and saline-treated groups were not different from each other, the present study demonstrates that single administration of buprenorphine does not cause neurotoxicity in mice with a focal permanent cerebral ischemia model.

It is difficult to explain the reasons behind the difference in findings of this in vivo study and the previous ones in vitro. Yet, while the opioidergic system in the brain has been implicated in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia, 8 , 12 the studies indicating the neuroprotective role of opioid receptor (KOR) agonists/antagonists are still controversial. Moreover, although recent studies indicated the role of kappa receptor agonists as neuroprotectants in cerebral ischemia, 12 – 14 other studies suggested the role of kappa receptors as mediators for ischemia aggravating effect for endogenous opioids. 15 – 18 Unfortunately, human studies evaluating the neuroprotective role of opioid receptor antagonists failed to find any treatment benefit in clinical studies. 19 – 21

Thus, in regard to these controversial results of receptor targeted treatments, it is difficult to explain the difference of this in vivo study from previous in vitro studies only with its kappa receptor antagonist activity which may have balanced its neuroprotection. Moreover, if the same finding can be replicated by the chronic administration of buprenorphine in vivo, adaptative changes leading to receptor up- or down-regulation in opioid receptors may also be discussed as a contributing factor preventing the development of ischemic neuronal damage.

In conclusion, this study provides strong preclinical evidence for the safety of using buprenorphine during the postoperative period following ischemic events, as well as for an alternative maintenance therapy of opioid-dependent patients wherein the risk of cerebrovascular events is increased.