The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

N euroimaging studies of adults with bipolar disorder have implicated a number of limbic and paralimbic regions in the pathophysiology of this condition. 1 Primary candidate regions have included the hippocampus, caudate, putamen, thalamus, and amygdala. 2 The hippocampus is one region in the brain that has received significant attention in mood disorder research, and the highly plastic, stress sensitive hippocampal complex may play a central role in mood disorder. 3 Interest in hippocampal volume stems from neuropsychological and neuropathological studies that implicate this structure in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorders. For instance, enlarged right hippocampal volume is reportedly associated with poor neuropsychological functioning in bipolar disorder, 4 and findings from a neuropathological study have indicated a reduction and dysgenesis of various neuronal cell lines in entorhinal and hippocampal cortex of bipolar subjects. 5

Results of the published MRI volumetric studies of hippocampus in bipolar disorder have been inconsistent. 1 , 6 While one study found a trend for decreased volume in the right hippocampus, 7 five studies did not find any changes, 812 and three studies showed an increased hippocampal size. 4 , 13 , 14 Some potential causes for hippocampal volume changes include genetic vulnerability, 1 aberrant neurodevelopment process, 15 number of episodes or illness duration, 16 , 17 disease subtype, 18 and medication effects. 13 , 19 The confounding effects of sex 7 , 20 have been considered as well. Given the inconsistency in the literature, we concluded that there was a need for further volumetric studies of the hippocampus in bipolar disorder using high resolution MRI, in which both confounding factors and determinants of volumetric differences can be examined.

METHODS

Subjects

Eighteen women and six men who were 19–59 years old (mean 38.2±11.0 years) with DSM-IV bipolar disorder I were recruited from the Sydney, Australia, Bipolar Disorder Clinic, which is a secondary and tertiary referral service. Research psychiatrists made the diagnoses using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-P) supplemented by a case note review. 21 Participants were considered to meet criteria for bipolar disorder with psychosis if hallucinations and/or delusions were present during at least one affective episode. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of ongoing substance misuse, neurological disease or closed-head injury or had an additional axis I or axis II DSM-IV diagnosis, a medical disorder currently necessitating treatment.

At the time of MRI scanning, 12 participants were taking lithium (mean daily dose 975.1±213.2 mg) with a mean plasma level of 0.77±0.1 mmol/liter, with four of these also receiving sodium valproate. Eight patients were taking valproate, carbamazepine, or a combination of the two, and the remaining four patients were not on medication. Fourteen patients had at least one first-degree relative with an affective disorder, and 10 patients had no family history of affective illnesses.

Patients were compared with volunteers matched for age (within 2 years), sex, handedness (all right-handed), and years of education (mean 14.8±2.1 years) who were recruited by local advertisement. Comparison subjects were screened for a history of neurological or psychiatric disorder (with SCID-NP) or a family history of the same problems. They underwent the same clinical assessments and self-report questionnaires as patients immediately prior to scanning. The Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales research ethics committees approved the study, and all participants provided written informed consent.

MRI

Imaging was conducted with a 1.5 Tesla GE scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) for T1-weighted 3D structural. A 2D scout mid-sagittal cut for AC-PC plane alignment was first acquired. Then 3D structural MRI was acquired in coronal orientation using a T1-weighted FSPGR sequence (TR/TE=12.2/5.3; flip angle =250; matrix size =256×256; FOV =250×250 mm; no gap between), yielding coronal slices 1.6 mm thick with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.976562×0.976562 mm/pixel.

Volume Measurement

Hippocampus measurements were carried out by one trained rater (AJ) who was blinded to the subjects’ sex, age, and diagnosis. The periphery of the region of interest on coronal T1-weighted slices was manually outlined using 6.1 Analyze software (Imaging Resource Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota). The boundaries of the regions of interest were outlined by a cordless infrared light-driven cursor, and the number of voxels within the regions was calculated to produce a total volume for the region of interest. The outlining of the structures always proceeded from anterior to posterior. The hippocampus included the dentate gyrus, the hippocampus proper, and the subicular complex. 22 The protocol used was similar to the one published by Watson et al. 23 Interrater reliability of hippocampal measurement determined on 5 scans (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.90) and intrarater reliability on nine scans (ICC=0.98) were both high.

Data Analyses

Left and right hippocampal volumes were normalized to the total intracranial volume of the comparison group using the following formula 2324 :

normalized (or corrected) volume=R × raw volume , where R is the mean total intracranial volume of the comparison subject divided by the patient’s total intracranial volume. Total intracranial volume was calculated by segmenting raw structural images into gray matter, white matter, and CSF using the template in SPM5 software (Welcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Queen Sq., London).

Normalized hippocampus volumes were compared between patients and comparison subjects, using age, sex, and education as covariates in the analysis. Exploratory analyses were performed to determine the effects of duration of illness, frequency of episodes, disease subtype, family history of affective disorder, and lithium on hippocampus volumes. Bipolar patients and age- and sex-matched comparison subjects were compared on demographic variables. Pair-wise t test was used to compare the difference of raw and normalized volumes of hippocampus between bipolar patients and matched comparison subjects. Hippocampus asymmetry was investigated by comparing right-to-left ratio of volumes between bipolar patients and comparison subjects using pair-wise t test. Effects of clinical features of bipolar disorder on hippocampus volumes were determined by a two-step approach. First, pair-wise t tests were applied to examine the effects of psychosis, family history, use of lithium, episodes of depression, and duration of illness on the normalized hippocampus volumes between bipolar patients and matched comparison subjects. Second, volumetric effects on normalized hippocampus volumes of clinical variables were examined further within the group of bipolar patients by independent t test for categorical variables and Spearman’s correlation analyses for continuous variables. The effects of variables showing significance in unvaried analyses was examined further using ANCOVA to control for effects of age and sex. All statistical analyses were performed using an SPSS software (14.0 for Windows) package. A p value of 0.05 was used as the level of significance for all tests.

RESULTS

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 24 bipolar subjects and 24 healthy comparison subjects are presented in Table 1 . As expected, no significant differences between the two groups were noted for age, sex, and education.

TABLE 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Bipolar Disorder and Comparison Groups
TABLE 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Bipolar Disorder and Comparison Groups
Enlarge table

Hippocampal Volumes

In pair-wise analyses, controlled for age, sex and education, bipolar subjects had significantly (p<0.01) larger left hippocampal (by 8.5%) volume than the healthy comparison subjects. This difference remained significant when the volumes were normalized. Table 2 shows the mean values for both measured and normalized hippocampal volumes.

TABLE 2. Analyses of Hippocampal Volumes in Bipolar and Healthy Comparison Subjects
TABLE 2. Analyses of Hippocampal Volumes in Bipolar and Healthy Comparison Subjects
Enlarge table

Exploratory analyses were performed to examine the following.

Hippocampal Asymmetry

In both groups, the hippocampus was slightly larger on the right side than on the left. However, analyses for right-left difference were not significant, and right-to-left volume ratios did not differ significantly between the bipolar and comparison groups (t=1.298, p=0.207).

Disease Subtype

At the time of study, 14 patients were defined as psychotic and 10 were defined as nonpsychotic. Results from pair-wise analyses revealed no significant differences in hippocampal volume between psychotic bipolar patients and nonpsychotic bipolar patients relative to the matched comparison subjects (t=1.932, p=0.075; t=2.036, p=0.072, respectively). Furthermore, univariate analysis also did not show any significant difference between psychotic bipolar patients and nonpsychotic bipolar patients (t=−0.539, p=0.595) ( Table 3 ).

TABLE 3. Comparison of Normalized Volumes of Left Hippocampus in Bipolar Disorder and Healthy Comparison Groups Relative to Clinical Features
TABLE 3. Comparison of Normalized Volumes of Left Hippocampus in Bipolar Disorder and Healthy Comparison Groups Relative to Clinical Features
Enlarge table

Family History

Of the bipolar patients, 14 had a family history of unipolar or bipolar affective disorder. Pair-wise analyses on the left hippocampus volume revealed a significant difference between participants without family history of affective disorder and comparison subjects (t=2.619, p=0.028), but not in those with positive family history (t=1.593, p=0.135). Further univariate analysis on left hippocampal volume revealed no significant difference between bipolar patients with family history of affective disorder and patients without family history (t=−1.289, p=0.212) ( Table 3 ).

Use of Lithium

Patients being treated with lithium (n=12) were compared with those who were not (n=12). Results from pair-wise analyses primarily showed larger left hippocampus volume in the lithium treated group relative to comparison subjects (t=3.222, p=0.008) which was not significant for nonlithium treated patients (t=1.158, p=0.271). In further univariate analysis there was no significant difference between lithium treated and untreated bipolar patients (t=−0.823, p=0.419) ( Table 3 ).

Duration of Illness and Number of Episodes

We divided the patients into two groups according to the duration of illness from age of onset (≤10 years, n=10, and >10 years, n=14) and number of episodes of mood disorder including both manic and depressive episodes (≤10 episodes, n=11, and >10 episodes, n=13). Primary pair-wise t test determined bipolar patients with 10 years or fewer of duration of illness as well as subjects with 10 or fewer episodes who had a larger left hippocampus relative to healthy comparison subjects (t=5.837, p=0.000; t=3.561, p=0.005, respectively) ( Table 3 ). Using Spearman’s correlation, episodes as well as duration were significantly correlated to decreasing left hippocampus volume (r=−0.408, p=0.023; r=−0.431, p=0.036, separately). However, univariate analysis did not show significant differences within subgroups of bipolar patients ( Table 3 ).

Additional analysis of confounding factors did not reveal significant correlation between hippocampus volume and age (r=−0.257, p=0.225), education (r=−0.323, p=0.750), and sex (r=−0.257, p=0.225).

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study is that bipolar disorder patients had larger left hippocampus volumes compared to age-, sex-, and education-matched comparison subjects.

Various studies have reported structural brain abnormalities in patients with mood disorder. However, abnormalities in brain regions have been inconsistent. Reduction in prefrontal and frontal volumes was more consistently revealed in both unipolar depression and bipolar disorder, whereas abnormalities in subcortical structures have been different between these two classes of affective disorders. The hippocampus is one of the most studied structures in unipolar depression. Several meta-analyses have confirmed that patients with unipolar depression have smaller hippocampus volumes than healthy individuals. 25 , 26 In the unipolar-depression literature, increased illness duration and increased frequency of episodes have been associated with decreased hippocampal volume. 27 , 28 Presently, studies of hippocampal volumes in depression have been somewhat inconsistent. This inconsistency may stem from heterogeneity of etiological and associated factors of depression.

The published literature suggests that hippocampal volume abnormalities are common in bipolar disorder, but whether this is due to a reduction or an enlargement is controversial. 4 , 715 Our finding is consistent with the three earlier studies that found increased hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorder 4 , 13 , 14 but is in contrast to other studies that found no differences between bipolar patients and comparison subjects 812 or a reduction in hippocampal volumes in bipolar patients. 20

A number of potential causes of hippocampal volume changes have been postulated. These include genetic predisposition, 1 neurodevelopment defect, 15 , 20 sex, 7 , 20 age, 13 duration of illness, number of episodes, 16 , 17 disease subtype, 18 and medication effect. 13 , 19 A key argument here is whether the abnormality predates the onset of the disorder or develops secondarily and what role drugs play in its development.

Our finding of a negative relationship between left hippocampal volumes and duration of illness is important in this context. There is some evidence in support of the illness duration and frequency of episodes as being implicated in structural abnormalities observed in mood disorders. 9 , 17 , 2729 Patients with prolonged course of illness and more frequent episodes have consistently shown poor neuropsychological function. 30 , 31 Studies on patients with first-episode affective disorder reported some structural abnormalities at least in a portion of patients, suggesting that these abnormalities are present early in the course of the illness. 15 Ali et al. 17 found that longer duration of illness was associated with larger hippocampal volume in bipolar disorder. Some researchers found that a greater number of manic episodes was associated with a large amygdala volume, a structure anatomically associated with the hippocampal complex. 9 One investigation on pediatric and adolescent bipolar disorder patients—a population probably presenting the initial course of the disorder—found a hippocampal volume reduction suggestive of aberrant neurodevelopmental defect in this structure. 20 However, in a recent study performed by Velakoulis et al., 32 hippocampal volumes were normal in a first-episode group of patients with affective psychosis, which is consistent with some studies which failed to detect any association between frequency of affective episodes or duration of illness and the hippocampal volume. 10 , 13 The literature is therefore by no means conclusive on this topic. Our data revealed that patients with shorter illness duration and fewer episodes of affective disorder had larger left hippocampus volume relative to healthy comparison subjects, and hippocampus volume was inversely correlated with illness duration and number of episodes. This suggests that hippocampal volume was possibly larger early in the course of the illness and decreased as it progressed. These findings could be equated with the role of a neurodevelopment abnormality early in the course of the disorder and a pathophysiologic process that occurs with illness progression; a longitudinal study is necessary for a definitive determination. We view these findings with caution since a retrospective determination of duration of illness and number of episodes is often prone to error, and our study did not include first-onset cases. Furthermore, our sample was too small to yield sufficient statistical power to exclude effect of confounding factors like age. More studies of first-episode cases that are followed up longitudinally are necessary to address this discrepancy.

Another possible factor that may affect hippocampal volume in bipolar disorder is medication. Effects of medications on regional brain volumes have been found in some psychiatric conditions. 3337 Manji and Duman 35 suggested that medication exposure might cause regional volume changes by alteration in the glial cells and neurons. The hippocampus has been implicated as a site for this cellular plasticity. 38 The influence of medication in brain volume analyses may therefore be underappreciated. In previous studies of hippocampal volume in bipolar patients, only two assessed the effect of lithium. 10 , 13 In one study, Strakowaski et al. 10 did not find a correlation between hippocampal volume and use of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. Beyer et al. 13 reported increased left hippocampus volume in older bipolar patients, correlating it to exposure to lithium. Results of our study showed that bipolar patients exposed to lithium had larger left hippocampal volume relative to comparison subjects, but further univariate analysis comparing lithium-exposed and non-lithium-exposed subjects did not reveal a significant difference. However, insufficient information on the length of exposure was our study limitation. Furthermore, in our sample a substantial number of untreated patients (n=8) were taking other plasticity enhancing medications such as valproate and carbamazepine.

Earlier evidence suggests that bipolar disorder with psychotic and nonpsychotic features may be two different subtypes with dissimilar pathophysiology. 18 Neurophysiological investigations demonstrated a reversal of cerebral asymmetry in bipolar patients with a history of psychosis, suggesting that reversed asymmetry may be a trait marker in psychotic mood disorders. 39 Results of one study found that psychotic bipolar disorder patients, but not nonpsychotic bipolar patients, were associated with increased ventricle volumes and a trend toward smaller left hippocampus volume, concluding that hippocampal volume changes in bipolar disorder patients were not marked and did not clearly distinguish the psychotic bipolar disorder patients and nonpsychotic bipolar patients. 18 Consistent with this, our results did not reveal a significant difference in left hippocampus volume between psychotic bipolar patients and nonpsychotic bipolar patients relative to their comparison subjects.

Genetic predisposition is another putative potential factor for structural abnormalities in bipolar disorder. A volumetric study on twins with bipolar disorder showed a significant decrease in left hemispheric white matter volume in patients and co-twin relative to comparison twin subjects. 40 One study reported decreased hippocampal volume in affected versus unaffected twins and no hippocampal volume changes in unaffected co-twins of bipolar patients. 1 Brambilla et al. 41 noted that family history of mood disorders did not have any significant effects on amygdala volume, a structure consistently reported to be involved in bipolar disorder. In this study, we did not notice any significant difference in the hippocampal volume based on family history. However, studying pediatric bipolar patients at the onset of the illness is likely to be a useful strategy, since children and adolescents with bipolar disorder probably comprise a population with a more genetic susceptibility for the illness and are less likely to have many confounding variables associated with ongoing medication and illness chronicity.

In summary, we found that the left hippocampus was larger in a group of adult bipolar subjects relative to a healthy comparison group. The reason for this is unclear. In our sample, it was not associated with family history, psychotic features, or medication exposure. A negative association was found between left hippocampal volume and number of episodes or duration of illness. Our data suggest that the hippocampus might be larger in the early phase of bipolar disorder but becomes smaller with time. Nevertheless, a further longitudinal study, preferably in first-episode cases, is necessary to determine this conclusively.

Received September 19, 2008; revised February 15, 2009; accepted March 3, 2009. Drs. Javadapour, Chen, Wen, and Sachdev are affiliated with the Neuropsychiatric Institute at the Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney in Australia; Dr. Javadapour is also affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Shiraz, Iran; Professor Malhi is affiliated with the CADE Clinic, Discipline of Psychiatry, at the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, in Australia; Dr. Ivanovski is affiliated with South Eastern Sydney & Illawarra Area Health Service in Sydney, Australia; Drs. Chen, Wen, and Sachdev are affiliated with the School of Psychiatry at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. Address correspondence to Gin S. Malhi, Professor and Head CADE Clinic, Discipline of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; [email protected] (e-mail).

Copyright © 2010 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

References

1. Hajek T, Carrey N, Alda M: Neuroanatomical abnormalities as risk factors for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2005; 7:393–403Google Scholar

2. Chang K, Karchemskiy A, Barnea-Goraly N, et al: Reduced amygdalar gray matter volume in familial pediatric bipolar disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005; 44:6Google Scholar

3. Campbell S, Macqueen G: The role of hippocampus in the pathophysiology of major depression. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2004; 29:417–426Google Scholar

4. Ali SO, Denicoff KD, Altshuler LL, et al: A preliminary study of the relation of neuropsychological performance to neuroanatomic structures in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2000; 13:20–28Google Scholar

5. Benes FM, Kwok EW, Vincent SL, et al: A reduction of nonpyramidal cells in sector CA2 of schizophrenics and manic depressives. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 44:88–97Google Scholar

6. Beyer JL, Krishnan KR: Volumetric brain imaging findings in mood disorders. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4:89–104Google Scholar

7. Swayze VW II, Andreasen NC, Alliger RJ, et al: Subcortical and temporal structures in affective disorder and schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 1992; 31:221–240Google Scholar

8. Hauser P, Matochik J, Altshuler LL, et al: Post RMMRI-based measurements of temporal lobe and ventricular structures in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. J Affect Disord 2000; 60:25–32Google Scholar

9. Altshuler LL, Bartzokis G, Grieder T, et al: An MRI study of temporal lobe structures in men with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:147–162Google Scholar

10. Strakowski SM, DelBello MP, Sax KW, et al: Brain magnetic resonance imaging of structural abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56:254–260Google Scholar

11. Hauser P, Altshuler LL, Berrettini W, et al: Temporal lobe measurement in primary affective disorder by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1989; 1:128–134Google Scholar

12. Pearlson GD, Barta PE, Powers RE, et al: Ziskind-Somerfeld research award 1996: medial and superior temporal gyral volumes and cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1997; 41:1–14Google Scholar

13. Beyer JL, Kuchibhatla M, Payne ME, et al: Hippocampal volume measurement in older adults with bipolar disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 12:613–620Google Scholar

14. Noga JT, Vladar K, Torrey EF: A volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study of monozygotic twins discordant for bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging 2001; 106:25–34Google Scholar

15. Bearden CE, Hoffman KM, Cannon TD: The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review. Bipolar Disord 2001; 3:106–150Google Scholar

16. Caetano SC, Nicoletti MA, Hatch JP, et al: Associations of age and length of illness with hippocampus and amygdala volumes in mood disorder patients. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 55:109SGoogle Scholar

17. Ali SO, Denicoff KD, Altshuler LL, et al: Relationship between prior course of illness and neuroanatomic structures in bipolar disorder: a preliminary study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001; 14:227–232Google Scholar

18. Strasser HC, Lilyestrom J, Ashby ER, et al: Hippocampal and ventricular volumes in psychotic and nonpsychotic bipolar patients compared with schizophrenia patients and community control subjects: a pilot study. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:633–639Google Scholar

19. Monkul ES, Malhi GS, Soares JC: Anatomical MRI abnormalities in bipolar disorder: do they exist and do they progress? Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39:222–226Google Scholar

20. Frazier JA, Chiu S, Breeze JL, et al: Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of limbic and thalamic volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1256–1265Google Scholar

21. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I & Axis II Disorders (Version 2.0). New York, Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1995Google Scholar

22. Duvernoy HM: The Human Brain, 2nd ed. New York, Springer, 1999Google Scholar

23. Watson C, Jack CR Jr, Cendes F: Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging: clinical applications and contributions to the understanding of temporal lobe epilepsy. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:1521–1531Google Scholar

24. Brierley B, Shaw P, David AS: The human amygdala: a systematic review and meta-analysis of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Rev 2002; 39:84–105Google Scholar

25. Campbell S, Marriott M, Nahmias C, et al: Lower hippocampal volume in patients suffering from depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:598–607Google Scholar

26. Videbech P, Ravnkilde B: Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-analysis of MRI studies. Am J Psychiatry 2004 ; 161:1957–1966 Google Scholar

27. Axelson DA, Doraiswamy PM, McDonald WM, et al: Hypercortisolemia and hippocampal changes in depression. Psychiatry Res 1993; 47:163–173Google Scholar

28. MacQueen GM, Campbell S, McEwen BS, et al: Course of illness, hippocampal function, and hippocampal volume in major depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1387–1392Google Scholar

29. Eastwood SL, Harrison PJ: Synaptic pathology in the anterior cingulate cortex in schizophrenia and mood disorders: a review and a Western blot study of synaptophysin, GAP-43 and the complexins. Brain Res Bull 2001; 55:569–578Google Scholar

30. Martinez-Aran A, Vieta E, Colom F, et al: Cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar disorder: evidence of neuropsychological disturbances. Psychother Psychosom 2000; 69:2–18Google Scholar

31. Denicoff KD, Ali SO, Mirsky AF, et al: Relationship between prior course of illness and neuropsychological functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 1999; 56:67–73Google Scholar

32. Velakoulis D, Wood SJ, Wong MT, et al: Hippocampal and amygdala volumes according to psychosis stage and diagnosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study of chronic schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, and ultra-high-risk individuals. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63:139–149Google Scholar

33. Doraiswamy PM, Tupler LA, Krishnan KR: Neuroleptic treatment and caudate plasticity. Lancet 1995; 345:734–735Google Scholar

34. Giedd JN, Jeffries NO, Blumenthal J, et al: Childhood-onset schizophrenia: progressive brain changes during adolescence. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:869–870Google Scholar

35. Manji HK, Duman RS: Impairments of neuroplasticity and cellular resilience in severe mood disorders: implications for the development of novel therapeutics. Psychopharmacol Bull 2001; 35:5–49Google Scholar

36. Sassi RB, Brambilla P, Hatch JP, et al: Reduced left anterior cingulate volumes in untreated bipolar patients. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56:467–475Google Scholar

37. Moore CM, Breeze JL, Gruber SA, et al: Choline, myo-inositol and mood in bipolar disorder: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study of the anterior cingulate cortex. Bipolar Disord 2000; 2:207–216Google Scholar

38. Chen G, Rajkowska G, Du F, et al: Enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis by lithium. J Neurochem 2000; 75:1729–1734Google Scholar

39. Reite M, Teale P, Rojas DC, et al: Bipolar disorder: anomalous brain asymmetry associated with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1159–1163Google Scholar

40. Kieseppa T, van Erp TG, Haukka J, et al: Reduced left hemispheric white matter volume in twins with bipolar I disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:896–905Google Scholar

41. Brambilla P, Harenski K, Nicoletti M, et al: MRI investigation of temporal lobe structures in bipolar patients. J Psychiatr Res 2003; 37:287–295Google Scholar