The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

T he concepts of negative and positive symptoms were first proposed by Hughlings Jackson (1931) to characterize different symptom complexes of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms include affective flattening, alogia and avolition, anergia, apathy, anhedonia, and loss of social drive. Unlike positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, negative symptoms begin insidiously and patients typically report a long history of poor premorbid functioning. 1 Negative symptom patients tend to follow a chronic course with an adverse impact on quality of life, social functioning, and cognitive functioning. 2

Recent interest has identified the presence of negative symptoms in other neurological populations. 3 , 4 In our current study, we focus on the potential role of the basal ganglia and anterior cingulate in the expression of negative symptoms in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Getz et al. 5 reported that 31% of a TLE patient group demonstrated negative symptoms. There was no difference in the rate of positive symptoms or depression symptoms between the groups. Second, recent studies in TLE have demonstrated reduced D2/D3 dopamine receptor binding 6 and other volumetric abnormalities in basal ganglia nuclei. 79 Electrical stimulation and depth electrode studies indicate that these subcortical nuclei play a role in the behavioral manifestations, propagation, and possibly initiation of epileptic seizures. 1012 Magnetic resonance volumetric abnormalities have been identified in several basal ganglia structures in TLE patients. 7 , 13 It could be that in TLE a distinct subset of patients has a propensity to propagate seizure activity beyond the temporal lobe, and related structural damage to key subcortical structures within the broader mesolimbic system could be associated with negative symptoms.

In the discussion regarding a possible neural system supporting negative symptoms in schizophrenia, the mesolimbic dopamine system has received considerable attention. The mesolimbic frontal-subcortical network is comprised of many functionally related structures. The extent of direct and reciprocal connections within the network suggest that incoming cortical multimodal sensory and limbic input converge in the basal ganglia before influencing output to the anterior cingulate. After integration within the basal ganglia, these limbic, striatal, and corticocortical neural inputs combine to determine the emotional and motivational significance of incoming information and then guide output behavior accordingly. Nonhuman primate studies have demonstrated that selective lesioning of structures in the mesolimbic circuit results in behavior which mimic negative symptoms. 14 In first-episode neuroleptic naive schizophrenia patients, reduced volumes of the basal ganglia have been observed realative to same-age comparison subjects. 15 , 16 Thus, disruption within the mesolimbic structures could result in negative symptoms including apathy, loss of motivation and diminished spontaneity, reduced verbal output, paucity of facial expression, diminished motor behavior, and increased response latency.

Examining other neurological disorders with documented structural and functional changes in key targets of basal ganglia and dopamine influence, one finds that negative symptoms often co-occur with both localized lesions 3 , 17 and system-wide atrophy. 1821 In other neurological populations with prominent apathy, the basal ganglia have been targets of examination. Paul et al. 4 found that increased ratings of apathy were negatively correlated with nucleus accumbens volumes in HIV+ patients. In Parkinson’s disease, degeneration of the dopaminergic mesolimbic reward circuit has been offered as the putative neural substrate for apathy and anhedonia 22 and could also explain disruptions in other behaviors that are dependent on evaluating and reacting to incoming drive-related information. In a study comparing basal ganglia volumes in early- and late-stage Parkinson’s disease patients to healthy comparison subjects, Geng et al. 23 found that in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease, atrophy is observed in the putamen. In later stages, both putamen and globus pallidus volumes are significantly reduced relative to comparison subjects. However, the authors did not discuss psychiatric disorder in the patient groups.

In summary, converging evidence suggests that damage at different locations within the mesolimbic circuit may result in a system-wide disruption in behavior manifested in the distinct behavioral phenomenon of negative symptoms. Given the evidence of volume abnormalities in these regions in TLE, we hypothesized that:

1.

TLE subjects with negative symptoms would show more volume loss in the basal ganglia and anterior cingulate than a TLE group without negative symptoms.

2.

Decreased volume in basal ganglia and anterior cingulate would be associated with an increased number of negative symptoms.

METHODS

Participants

A consecutive series of 100 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and 92 healthy comparison subjects were available for inclusion in the current study. From this set, 22 patients with negative symptoms (NEG) were matched on age of epilepsy onset to 22 epilepsy patients without negative symptoms (NoNEG) and 22 healthy comparison subjects. Age and gender were also used in matching subjects.

Subjects were recruited from the University of Wisconsin Epilepsy Clinic as part of a larger project examining the neurodevelopmental features of TLE. Individuals were excluded due to mental retardation (IQ<70) or additional neurological diagnoses. Initial selection criteria for the epilepsy patients included a chronological age from 18 to 60 years old and complex partial seizures. Diagnosis was conducted by a board-certified neurologist with expertise in epileptology who reviewed patients’ medical records. This review was blinded to all quantitative imaging data reported here. Healthy comparison subjects were primarily spouses or friends of the TLE participants. Comparison subjects were excluded if they were taking psychotropic medications or if there was evidence of a medical or psychiatric condition or current substance abuse that could affect cognitive functioning. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to beginning study procedures.

Assessment of Negative Symptoms

All participants underwent a comprehensive psychiatric assessment including the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) 24 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). For the SANS, ratings were conducted by three trained investigators for negative symptoms on the SANS. These raters were blinded to information regarding the participants’ cognitive performance or MRI volumes. The SANS contains four global domains including affective flattening or blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, and anhedonia-asociality. The four domains are made up of 18 individual items. Each subject was rated from absent (0) to severe (5) on each item by three independent raters who then reached a consensus on SANS ratings.

Quantitative MRI Volumetrics

Magnetic resonance images were acquired at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and processed using the semiautomated software package Brain Research: Analysis of Images, Networks, and Systems (BRAINS2). University of Wisconsin staff was blinded to the clinical, sociodemographic, and neuropsychological characteristics of the participants. The T 1 -weighted images were spatially normalized so that the anterior-posterior axis of the brain was realigned parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (ACPC) line and the interhemispheric fissure was aligned on the other two axes. A six-point linear transformation was used to warp the standard Talairach atlas space onto the resampled image. Images from the three pulse sequences were then coregistered using a local adaptation of automated image registration software. Following alignment of the image sets, the PD and T 2 images were resampled into 1 mm cubic voxels following which an automated algorithm classified each voxel into gray matter, white matter, CSF, blood, or “other.” The brains were then removed from the skull using a neural network application that had been trained on a set of manual traces. Manual inspection and correction of the output of the neural network tracing was conducted. A stereotaxic method based on the Talairach atlas yields measures of left and right frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes and cerebellum. The BRAINS2 software and procedures have been shown to have high interrater and intrarater reliability, and scan-rescan reproducibility. 25

For this investigation, recently developed automated neural networks for the basal ganglia structures, including the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus, were manually edited based on guidelines published by the University of Iowa Imaging Center. 26 Manual traces of the nucleus accumbens and anterior cingulate were adapted from guidelines available in the scientific literature. 27 , 28 All traces were conducted blinded to group membership. Interrater reliability was as follows for the regions of interest: caudate nucleus (0.97), putamen (0.98), globus pallidus (0.94), nucleus accumbens (0.98), and anterior cingulate (0.83). Figure 1 and Figure 2 depict the regions under investigation.

FIGURE 1. Basal Ganglia and Anterior Cingulate Regions of Interest
FIGURE 2. Anterior Cingulate Region of Interest

MRI Volumetric Statistical Analyses

Magnetic resonance imaging volumes were standardized in two ways relative to the value of the total sample of comparison subjects (n=92): using a regression based z-score transformation controlling for the effects of intracranial volume and using a regression based z-score transformation controlling for the effects of height. Beta weights, regression coefficient, and the standard residuals from these analyses were then used to calculate z-scores for the two epilepsy groups (n=44) and the subsample of comparison subjects included in the current study (n=22). Analyses were run using both intracranial volume and height z-score transformations with no difference on the direction of the findings or statistical significance. For the reported analyses, height was chosen as a covariate as it had fewer problems with collinearity with the regions of interest compared to intracranial volume.

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical features of the epilepsy patient and comparison groups. The two epilepsy patient groups showed no significant differences on basic clinical seizure characteristics including duration, age of onset, number of antiepileptic medications, number of secondarily generalized seizures, or frequency of complex-partial seizures.

TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Temporal Epilepsy Patients and Comparison Subjects
TABLE 1. Demographic Characteristics of Temporal Epilepsy Patients and Comparison Subjects
Enlarge table

Negative Symptoms

The epilepsy patients with negative symptoms (NEG) had an average of 8.8 negative symptoms (SD=6.6, range=1–26) relative to epilepsy patients without negative symptoms (NoNEG) and comparison groups. Affective flattening was the most common negative symptom (59.0%, n=19) followed by alogia (45.5%, n=13), avolition (24.0%, n=7), and anhedonia (18.2%, n=6). The comparison and NEG groups differed on total number of depression symptoms as assessed by the BDI (t=−2.24, df=43, p=0.03, two-tailed). However, there was no significant difference between the two epilepsy groups on BDI score (t=−0.613, df=38, p=0.54) or a significant correlation between number of negative symptoms and total BDI score (r =0.12, p=0.47), or BDI and any of the region of interest volumes examined (p>0.05 in all cases).

Volumetric Region of Interest Findings

Using Wilks’ criterion, a multivariate analysis of variance including all five regions of interest (i.e., average left/right, adjusted for height) yielded a significant difference between groups (F=2.74, df=10, 114, η 2 =0.19, p=0.01). Univariate analyses determined that the three groups differed significantly on volumes of the caudate nucleus (F=3.13, df=2, 61, η 2 =0.09, p=0.05), the putamen (F=3.69, df=2, 61, η 2 =0.11, p=0.03), and the globus pallidus (F=9.65, df=2, 61, η 2 =0.24, p=0.001).

Of particular interest are regions in which the NEG TLE group showed significant volume differences from both the comparison and the NoNEG TLE groups, and regions which also showed no differences between the NoNEG and comparison groups. Figure 3 displays these results. Significant differences were found between the healthy comparison and NEG groups for putamen (t=2.43, df=43, η 2 =0.12, p=0.02) and the globus pallidus (t=3.59, df=43, η 2 =0.23, p=0.001). Critically, the NEG group also had significantly smaller putamen (t=2.21, df=39, η 2 =0.11, p=0.03) and globus pallidus (t=3.85, df=39, η 2 =0.28, p=0.00) volumes relative to the NoNEG group. There were no significant differences observed between the comparison and NoNEG epilepsy groups on putamen (t=.39, df=40, η 2 =0.00, p=0.70) or globus pallidus (t=−0.51, df=40, η 2 =0.00, p=0.62). No significant difference was found between the three groups for the volumes of the nucleus accumbens or anterior cingulate. The epilepsy groups did have smaller caudate volumes than the comparison group, but there was no difference between the epilepsy groups on the volumes of the caudate. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two epilepsy groups on right (t=−1.02, df=35, p=0.34) or left (t=−0.76, df=35, p=0.45) temporal lobe volume or on volumes of the right hippocampus (t=−0.03, df=34, p=0.98) or left hippocampus (t=1.02, df=34, p=0.31). There was no significant relationship between antiepileptic medication and brain volumes.

FIGURE 3. Average Z-Score Magnetic Resonance Volumes Comparison of NoNEG and NEG Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Groups

To further examine the relationship between MRI volumes and negative symptoms, we conducted Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficients. The negative symptom of alogia was correlated with both the volume of the globus pallidus (r=−0.30, p=0.02) and the putamen (r=−0.29, p=0.02). Affective flattening was significantly correlated with the globus pallidus (r=−0.32, p=0.01). Thus, a higher number of negative symptoms on these dimensions were associated with lower volumes in these regions of interest. There was no relationship between volumes and the negative symptoms of anhedonia-asociality and avolition-apathy.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we hypothesized that negative symptoms in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) result from a system-wide disruption in an integrated neural network including the caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens, and anterior cingulate. Consistent with this hypothesis, the overall omnibus contrast indicated a significant difference between groups on volumes of these regions. The epilepsy patients with negative symptoms (NEG) had less volume in all five regions of interest and showed significantly reduced volumes relative to both healthy comparison and the epilepsy patients without negative symptoms (NoNEG) groups in two regions of interest within the basal ganglia network, the putamen, and globus pallidus. In addition, increased negative symptoms were associated with decreased volume in these two structures. We suggest that these two subcortical structures may play an important role in the expression of a system-wide disruption in a network that is associated with negative symptoms.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to determine that basal ganglia involvement is related to the phenomenon of negative symptoms in TLE. In that context, it is noteworthy that the two epilepsy groups did not differ from each other in temporal lobe and hippocampal volumes, but both groups significantly differed from comparison subjects. In addition, the TLE groups did not differ on an objective measure of depression, and negative symptoms were not related to depression symptoms (measured with BDI) or basal ganglia volumes.

Consistent with our findings, negative symptoms have been observed in patients with lesions localized to both the putamen and the globus pallidus. Troyer et al. 29 found that unilateral left putamen ischemic infarction resulted in alogia and abulia. Strub 30 described a male with bilateral hemorrhages in the globus pallidus who evidenced apathy, social withdrawal, flat affect, and alogia. In our sample, globus pallidus and the putamen volume were correlated with alogia; globus pallidus volume correlated with affective flattening. In schizophrenia patients, the volume of the globus pallidus has also been shown to be correlated with severity of negative symptoms. 31

Volume reductions in the globus pallidus and putamen have also been observed in schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease. Kreczmanski et al. 32 conducted a postmortem study of subcortical structures in 13 male schizophrenia patients and 13 age-matched comparison subjects. While the authors did not discuss the relationship between neuronal changes to positive or negative symptoms, they found reductions in the volume and total number of neurons in the putamen of the schizophrenia patients. Moreover, volumes of both the putamen and globus pallidus, but not the caudate nucleus, have recently been shown to be reduced in early- and late-stage Parkinson’s disease. 23

Accumulating evidence indicates that subcortical structures play a role in the behavioral manifestations, propagation, and possibly the initiation of epileptic seizures. 10 , 11 , 33 The ventral amygdalofugal pathway projects directly from the amygdala to the ventral striatum with some of its densest connections to the putamen and globus pallidus. 33 In TLE, seizures that originate in the amygdala have been shown to have a high propensity to propagate within the mesial temporal lobe and to extratemporal areas. 12 , 34 It is possible that the amygdalofugal propagation pathway differentially impacts the globus pallidus and putamen in the negative symptom group. Behavioral changes, including negative symptoms, have been observed in patients exhibiting amygdalar dysfunction. 35 , 36

Study Limitations and Future Directions

This is a community based sample of epilepsy patients who were recruited as part of a larger investigation of the neurobehavioral features of TLE. As most of these participants were not surgical candidates and did not undergo video-EEG monitoring, definitive information on the laterality of seizure focus was not available. In that context, we only examined average volume in the basal ganglia areas of interest.

We have speculated on the importance of the amygdala and its interconnectivity with the basal ganglia in the phenomenon of negative symptoms. Amygdalar damage has been observed in TLE. 37 While there is support for this possibility in both animal and human clinical literature, we did not conduct a direct volumetric trace of the amygdala. Future research focusing on the role of the amygdala and negative symptoms in TLE appears warranted.

In our study, we examined volumetric reductions in a sample of TLE patients with and without negative symptoms relative to age- and gender-matched comparison subjects. We found volume reductions in our TLE patients relative to comparison subjects in three out of the five regions of interest. Further, we suggest that the volume reductions in the putamen and globus pallidus observed between the two TLE groups is related to a system-wide disruption associated with negative symptoms. However, future studies should examine these critical areas using other epilepsy groups such as extratemporal or nonfocal generalized epilepsy types. If such groups demonstrate negative symptoms, but not volumetric reductions in the two regions of interest, it would further strengthen our contention that the volume reductions observed in these two regions of interest are specific to negative symptoms in TLE.

In our sample, the epilepsy patients were matched on duration of epilepsy. However, as a cross-sectional study, it is unclear when negative symptoms emerged in the NEG patients. In retrospective studies of schizophrenia patients, negative symptoms have been reported years prior to the onset of the first psychotic episode. 38 Recent attention has been devoted to determining whether the severity of negative symptoms in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia relates to volumetric changes. In a cross-sectional study involving schizophrenia patients, the volume of the globus pallidus has been shown to be correlated with severity of negative symptoms. 31 In volumetric studies of first episode schizophrenia patients, Glenthoj et al. 15 found evidence of basal ganglia pathology prior to initiating treatment with neuroleptics.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study implicate specific nodes (e.g., globus pallidus and putamen) within the broader mesolimbic system in the phenomenon of negative symptoms in TLE. We suggest that these two subcortical structures may play an important role in the expression of a system-wide disruption in a neural network that is associated with negative symptoms.

Received January 9, 2008; revised June 13, 2008; accepted June 18, 2008. Drs. Geary and Seidenberg are affiliated with the Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, in North Chicago; Dr. Geary is also affiliated with the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation at University of Illinois Chicago; Dr. Hermann is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. Address correspondence to Elizabeth Geary, Ph.D., Center for Stroke Research, University of Illinois Chicago, Department of Neurology, 912 South Wood St., Rm. 855N, M/C 796 Chicago 60612; [email protected] (e-mail).

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

References

1. Andreasen N: Positive versus negative symptoms: a critical evaluation. Schizophr Bull 1985; 11:380–389Google Scholar

2. Selten J, Wiersma D, vanden Bosch R: Distress attributed to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2000; 26:737–744Google Scholar

3. Levy M, Cummings J, Fairbanks L, et al: Apathy is not depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10:314–319Google Scholar

4. Paul R, Brickman A, Navia B, et al: Apathy is associated with volume of the nucleus accumbens in patients infected with HIV. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neuroscience 2005; 17:167–171Google Scholar

5. Getz K, Hermann B, Seidenberg M, et al: Negative symptoms in temporal lobe epilepsy. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:644–651Google Scholar

6. Werhahn K, Landvogt C, Klimpe S, et al: Decreased dopamine D2/D3-receptor binding in temporal lobe epilepsy: an [18F]fallypride PET study. Epilepsia 2006; 47:1392–1396Google Scholar

7. Dreifuss S, Vingerhoets F, Lazeyras F, et al: Volumetric measurements of subcortical nuclei in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 2001; 57:1636–1641Google Scholar

8. Parashos I, Oxley S, Boyko O: In vivo quantification of basal ganglia and thalamic degenerative changes in two temporal lobectomy patients with affective disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1993; 5:337–341Google Scholar

9. Szabo C, Lancaster J, Lee S, et al: MR imaging volumetry of subcortical structures and cerebellar hemispheres in temporal lobe epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27: 2155–2160Google Scholar

10. Dematteis M, Kahane P, Vercueik L, et al: MRI evidence for the involvement of basal ganglia in epileptic seizures: a hypothesis. Epileptic Disord 2001; 5:161–164Google Scholar

11. Norden A, Blumenfeld H: The role of subcortical structures in human epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2002; 3:219–231Google Scholar

12. Wennberg R, Arruda F, Quesney L, et al: Preeminence of extrahippocampal structures in the generation of mesial temporal seizures: Evidence from human depth electrode recordings. Epilepsia 2002; 42:716–726Google Scholar

13. Pulsipher D, Seidenberg M, Morton J, et al: MRI volume loss of subcortical structures in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2007; 11:442–449Google Scholar

14. Goldman P, Rosvold H: The effects of selective caudate lesions in infant and juvenile rhesus monkeys. Brain Research 1972; 43:53–66Google Scholar

15. Glenthoj A, Glenthoj B, Mackeprang T, et al: Basal ganglia volumes in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenia patients before and after short-term treatment with either a typical or an atypical antipsychotic drug. Psychiatry Res 2007; 154:199–208Google Scholar

16. Gunduz H, Wu H, Ashtari M, et al: Basal ganglia volumes in first-episode schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 52:801–808Google Scholar

17. Galynker I, Levinson I, Miner C: Negative symptoms in patients with basal ganglia strokes. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1995; 8:113–117Google Scholar

18. Aarsland D, Litvan I, Larsen, J: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001; 13:42–49Google Scholar

19. Buchsbaum M: The frontal lobes, basal ganglia, and temporal lobes three sites for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1990; 16:379–389Google Scholar

20. Reichman W, Negron A: Negative symptoms in the elderly patient with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16(suppl 1):S7–S11Google Scholar

21. Shenton M, Dickey C, Frumin M, et al: A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1997; 23:483–501Google Scholar

22. Isella V, Iurlaro S, Piolti R, et al: Physical anhedonia in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74:1308–1311Google Scholar

23. Geng D, Li Y, Zee C: Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis of basal ganglia nuclei and substantia nigra in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosurgery 2006; 58:256–262Google Scholar

24. Andreasen N: Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City, University of Iowa, 1983Google Scholar

25. Magnotta VA, Bockholt H J, et al: Subcortical, cerebellar, and magnetic resonance based consistent brain image registration. Neuroimage 2003; 19:233–245Google Scholar

26. University of Iowa Health Care: Iowa Mental Health Clinical Research Center: Imaging Processing. Available at www.psychiatry.uiowa.edu/mhcrc/IPLpages/manual_tracing.htmGoogle Scholar

27. Crespo-Facorro B, Kim J, Andreasen N, et al: Human frontal cortex: an MRI-based parcellation method. Neuroimage 1999; 10:500–519Google Scholar

28. Sullivan E, Deshmukh A, De Rosa E, et al: Striatal and forebrain nuclei volumes: contribution to motor function and working memory deficits in alcoholism. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:768–776Google Scholar

29. Troyer A, Black S, Armilio M, et al: Cognitive and motor functioning in a patient with selective infarction of the left basal ganglia: evidence for decreased non-routine response selection and performance. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42:902–911Google Scholar

30. Strub R: Frontal lobe syndrome in patient with bilateral globus pallidus lesions. Arch Neurology 1986; 46:1024–1027Google Scholar

31. Spinks R, Nopoulos P, Ward J, et al: Globus pallidus volume is related to symptom severity in neuroleptic naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2005; 73:229–233Google Scholar

32. Kreczmanski P, Heinsen H, Mantua V, et al: Volume, neuron density and total neuron number in five subcortical regions in schizophrenia. Brain 2007; 130:678-692Google Scholar

33. Lothman E, Bertram E, Stringer J: Functional anatomy of hippocampal seizures. Prog Neurobiol 1991; 37:1–82Google Scholar

33. Fudge J, Kunishio K, Walsh P, et al: Amygdaloid projections to ventromedial striatal subterritories in the primate. Neuroscience 2002; 110:257-275Google Scholar

34. Bartolomei F, Wendling F, Bellanger J, et al: Neural networks involving the medial temporal structures in temporal lobe. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112:1746-1760Google Scholar

35. Bowers D, Miller K, Mikos A, et al: Startling facts about emotion in Parkinson’s disease: blunted reactivity to aversive stimuli. Brain 2006; 129:3356–3365Google Scholar

36. Butman J, Allegri R, Thomson A, et al: Behavioral flexibility impairment with negative feedback in refractory temporal lobe epileptic patients with unilateral amygdala and hippocampal resection. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2007; 35:8–14Google Scholar

37. Bernasconi N, Natsume J, Bernasconi A: Progression in temporal lobe epilespy: differential atrophy in mesial temporal structures. Neurology 2005; 65:223–228Google Scholar

38. Malaspina D, Goetz R, Yale S, et al: Relation of familial schizophrenia to negative symptoms but not to the deficit syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:994–1003Google Scholar