The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

Objective:

N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoantibody-mediated neurological syndrome with prominent cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The clinical relevance of NMDAR antibodies outside the context of encephalitis was assessed in this study.

Methods:

Plasma from patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) (N=108) and healthy control subjects (N=89) was screened at baseline for immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, and IgG NMDAR antibodies, phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181), and the neuroaxonal injury marker neurofilament light (NfL). Clinical assessment of the patients included measures of cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson’s Disease). A subgroup of patients (N=61) was followed annually for up to 6 years.

Results:

Ten (9%) patients with PD tested positive for NMDAR antibodies (IgA, N=5; IgM, N=6; IgG, N=0), and three (3%) healthy control subjects had IgM NMDAR antibodies; IgA NMDAR antibodies were detected significantly more commonly among patients with PD than healthy control subjects (χ2=4.23, df=1, p=0.04). Age, gender, and disease duration were not associated with NMDAR antibody positivity. Longitudinally, antibody-positive patients had significantly greater decline in annual MMSE scores when the analyses were adjusted for education, age, disease duration, p-tau181, NfL, and follow-up duration (adjusted R2=0.26, p=0.01). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were not associated with antibody status, and no associations were seen between NMDAR antibodies and p-tau181 or NfL levels.

Conclusions:

NMDAR antibodies were associated with greater cognitive impairment over time in patients with PD, independent of other pathological biomarkers, suggesting a potential contribution of these antibodies to cognitive decline in PD.

Antibodies to neuronal surface antigens, such as the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), cause an autoimmune encephalitis characterized by cognitive dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms, seizures, and movement disorder (1). Although the NMDAR antibody immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype mediates encephalitis, NMDAR antibodies, particularly of the immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) isotypes, are also detected in patient populations in the absence of encephalitis. NMDAR antibodies of all isotypes have been shown to have pathogenic potential, with impaired glutamatergic signaling likely caused by NMDAR internalization at the synapse (2), but the clinical significance of NMDAR antibodies outside the context of encephalitis remains unclear. However, in a number of clinical conditions, including cancer (3), psychosis spectrum disorders (4), stroke (5), and postviral encephalitis (6), IgA and IgM NMDAR antibodies have been associated with cognitive impairment. In psychosis spectrum disorders and stroke, there is also some evidence to suggest that NMDAR antibodies are associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as psychosis and depression (4, 7, 8). In addition, an association between NMDAR antibodies and psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease has been reported, but this finding has not been consistently replicated (9, 10).

NMDAR antibodies are found in persons with dementia, particularly when the dementia subtype is atypical or unclassified, and cognitive impairment in these situations is often reversible with immunotherapy (8, 11). However, neuronal antibodies, particularly NMDAR antibodies, are also found in well-phenotyped classical presentations of neurodegenerative disease, although it is not clear how these antibodies relate to cognitive and other neuropsychiatric symptoms (8). This is an important question to address given the potential reversibility of antibody-mediated changes for symptoms that otherwise have few effective treatment options.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment are common among patients with PD, with more than 80% of patients developing dementia within 20 years of diagnosis (12). The particular time course for the development of dementia is highly variable and likely reflects the contribution of many factors, such as alpha-synuclein, phosphorylated tau, and beta-amyloid (13). The role of inflammation is also increasingly recognized in PD, including a possible role for humoral immunity to influence clinical phenotype (14). However, studies examining the prevalence and clinical relevance of NMDAR antibodies in Lewy body disease have produced conflicting results: one study found increased numbers of serum IgA and IgM NMDAR antibodies in patients with Lewy body dementias (dementia with Lewy bodies and PD dementia) (10), while another found no association with IgA antibodies and cognitive impairment in patients with PD, although the cognitive dysfunction exhibited by the patients in this study was modest (15).

When NMDAR antibodies are present in the context of neurodegenerative disease, the site of autoantibody production is not clear. In autoimmune encephalitis, it is likely that ongoing peripheral germinal center reactions generate antigen-specific plasma B cells, which differentiate and access the central nervous system (CNS) to produce pathogenic IgG (16). In neurodegenerative disease, it may be that the accelerated neuronal cell death and apoptosis lead to production of these antibodies. If NMDAR antibodies were produced following neuronal death, seropositivity might be expected to be associated with higher plasma levels of neurofilament light (NfL), a marker of neuroaxonal injury (17), and p-tau181, a marker of phosphorylated tau (18). Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) levels of NfL and tau have been reported to be markedly elevated in acute NMDAR antibody encephalitis and decrease with treatment (19, 20), but these biomarkers have not been examined in association with neuronal antibodies outside the context of encephalitis. Increased plasma NfL and p-tau181 concentrations are associated with faster cognitive decline in those with Lewy body dementias (2123); thus, in measuring these biomarkers in association with NMDAR antibodies, we hope to delineate potential influences on cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms observed among patients with PD.

In a well-characterized prospective cohort of patients with PD, we aimed to quantify the presence of IgA, IgM, and IgG NMDAR antibodies among patients with PD compared with healthy control subjects; to explore associations between NMDAR antibody positivity and cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD, both at baseline and longitudinally; and to investigate the relationship between NMDAR antibodies and plasma levels of p-tau181 and NfL.

Methods

Patient Cohort

Baseline plasma samples were taken from 108 patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD who participated in the Non-motor International Longitudinal Study (NILS) at King’s College Hospital, London, and 89 healthy control subjects. The NILS is a prospective cohort study designed to assess outcomes from nonmotor symptoms in PD over time; patients are initially assessed at baseline, with plasma samples collected and clinical measurements taken. Clinical measurements of the patients are then assessed annually for up to 6 years after inclusion. All included patients had a diagnosis of PD made by clinicians who were movement disorder specialists and in accordance with internationally recognized criteria (24). Exclusion criteria were atypical parkinsonism, age at PD onset <21 years old, insufficient clinical information, or insufficient archived plasma available for analysis. The NILS was authorized by local ethics committees. All patients provided written consent prior to study procedures, and all patient data were anonymized and coded.

Plasma samples from 89 healthy control subjects who consented were retrieved from archives at the South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, and to the extent possible, the samples were from individuals who were age- and sex-matched at the group level.

Clinical Data

Data extracted from the NILS database for patients with PD included sex, age, age at onset of PD, years of education, and Hoehn and Yahr stage (measures of PD progression) (25), as well as scores on the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease (motor), with higher scores denoting better performance (26), the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) for Parkinson’s Disease, with higher scores denoting greater severity or frequency of nonmotor symptoms (27), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), with higher scores denoting a higher anxiety or depression level (28), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), with higher scores denoting better cognition (29). Scales were administered by research clinicians. Psychotic symptoms were extracted from the hallucination and delusion items on the NMSS, and patients were considered to meet criteria for psychosis if they received a score 1 when frequency and severity were combined.

Plasma NMDAR Antibodies

All plasma samples were tested for NMDAR antibodies by using fixed cell-based assays, and testers were blinded to all clinical information. Samples were stored at −80°C until assayed. IgA, IgM, and IgG NMDAR antibodies were detected with a recombinant cell line transfected with an expression construct for the reactive receptor subunit NR1 utilizing indirect immunofluorescence (Euroimmun NMDAR kit, Lübeck, Germany) as described previously (30). Transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells were incubated with a plasma dilution of 1:10 from each patient; fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies (IgG, IgA, and IgM) were then added, and antibody binding was measured with immunofluorescence.

Plasma NfL Concentration

Plasma NfL concentrations were measured with a commercially available NF-Light kit on a single-molecule array Simoa HD-1 analyzer (Quanterix Corp., Billerica, Mass.) for 143 samples (PD group: N=105; healthy control group: N=38) at the UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers Laboratory in a single round of experiments with one batch of reagents. Testers were blinded to the samples, and 91% (N=130) of samples were measured in duplicate (there was insufficient material available for 13 samples; patients with PD: N=6, healthy control subjects: N=7). Intra-assay coefficients of variation were <5%. The limit of detection was 0.038 pg/mL, and the lower limit of quantification was 0.174 pg/mL.

Plasma p-tau181 Concentration

Plasma phosphorylated tau was measured in 104 PD samples at King’s College London with the commercially available Simoa pTau-181 Advantage V2 kit (Quanterix Corp.). Plasma was diluted to 1:4 and read on an HD-1 analyzer. Data acquisition spanned five analytical runs; the lower limit of quantification for this assay was 0.127 pg/mL, and the coefficient variation for interassay and intra-assay variability was 7.51% and 7.69%, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Healthy control subjects and patients with PD were compared across age, gender, antibody status, and NfL concentration. NMDAR antibody seropositive and seronegative PD patients were compared with regard to neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive outcomes, and functional disability, both at baseline and during the follow-up period. Continuous variables were compared by using independent t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, dependent on the distribution of the data. Categorical data were analyzed with chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

To assess the longitudinal effects of NMDAR antibodies, the annual decline in MMSE scores over the follow-up period was calculated. Linear regression was performed for annual decline in scores across subgroups with positive or negative NMDAR antibody status, and age, sex, years of education, follow-up duration, disease duration (months), and p-tau181 and NfL concentrations were used as covariates. Cognitive impairment was also classified dichotomously; patients with an MMSE score <26 were classified as cognitively impaired.

To achieve normality, NfL and p-tau181 concentrations were log-transformed. Within the patients with PD, linear regression was used to analyze log NfL and log p-tau181 concentrations across subgroups with positive or negative NMDAR antibody status, with age used as a covariate.

The significance threshold was set at a p value <0.05, and where applicable, values are reported for two-tailed tests. Significance values were uncorrected for multiple comparisons due to the exploratory nature of the analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata, version 16.0.

Results

Participants

A total of 108 patients with PD (25% female; mean±SD age=63.7±11.9 years) and 89 healthy control subjects (34% female; mean age=54.2±17.0 years) were included (Table 1); healthy control subjects were significantly younger than patients with PD (p<0.001). As reported in Table 2, the baseline mean Hoehn and Yahr Scale score for patients with PD who were negative for NMDAR antibodies was 2.34±0.76. The duration of PD at baseline was highly variable, with a median of 6.8 years (range 1–32).

TABLE 1. Demographic and biomarker characteristics of healthy control subjects and patients with Parkinson’s diseasea

CharacteristicHealthy control subjects (N=89)Parkinson’s disease patients (N=108)Test statisticdfpb
MeanSDMeanSD
Age (years)54.217.063.711.9t=−4.59195<0.001
NfL concentration (pg/ml)c23.520.225.916.3t=−1.741410.08
p-tau181 concentration (pg/ml)2.321.36
N%N%
Female30342725χ2=1.8010.18
NMDAR antibody positive33109χ2=2.7410.10
IgA NMDAR antibody positive055χ2=4.2310.04

aIgA=immunoglobulin A; NfL=neurofilament light; NMDAR=N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; p-tau181=phosphorylated tau 181.

bBold denotes statistical significance.

cData were available for 38 healthy control subjects and log-transformed (log NfL) for the analysis.

TABLE 1. Demographic and biomarker characteristics of healthy control subjects and patients with Parkinson’s diseasea

Enlarge table

TABLE 2. Demographic, clinical, and biomarker data based on antibody status for 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD)a

VariableIgA or IgM NMDAR antibody positive (N=10)NMDAR antibody negative (N=98)Test statisticdfp
N%N%
Female3302424χ2=0.1510.70
Psychosis at baseline02222χ2=2.8910.09
MeanSDMeanSD
Age (years)63.19.964.611.7t=0.391060.69
Education (years)b15.74.415.94.7U=0.270.81
Duration with PD (years)b7.35.96.76.2U=−0.330.74
Age at PD onset (years)55.89.157.912.5t=0.511060.61
Baseline MMSE scoreb28.62.128.82.4U=0.290.77
Baseline Hoehn and Yahr Scale scoreb2.330.502.340.76U=0.120.93
Baseline SCOPA motor score16.49.716.87.9t=0.13810.89
Baseline HADS scoreb96.810.57.5U=0.550.59
Plasma NfL concentration (pg/ml)c31.632.426.014.3t=−0.191100.85
Plasma p-tau181 concentration (pg/ml)c1.850.252.341.37t=1.251090.21

aHADS=Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IgA=immunoglobulin A; IgM=immunoglobulin M; MMSE=Mini-Mental State Examination; NfL=neurofilament light; NMDAR=N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; p-tau181=phosphorylated tau 181; SCOPA=Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease.

bVariable was compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test.

cData were log-transformed (i.e., log NfL or log ptau) for the analysis.

TABLE 2. Demographic, clinical, and biomarker data based on antibody status for 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD)a

Enlarge table

Sixty-one (56%) patients with PD (28% female, mean age=63.3±11.6 years) were followed longitudinally (mean duration=3.69±1.73 years; median=3.99 years, range 0.71–6.61 years). The baseline mean MMSE score for these patients was 28.8±2.4, which declined by a mean of 0.60±1.24 points annually during the follow-up period.

Plasma NMDAR Antibody Positivity Among PD Patients and Healthy Control Subjects

Ten (9%) patients in the PD group tested positive for NMDAR antibodies (IgA, N=5; IgM, N=6; IgG, N=0); one of these patients had both IgA and IgM NMDAR antibodies. Three healthy control subjects (3.3%) tested positive for NMDAR antibodies, all with an IgM isotype antibody. IgA NMDAR antibodies were significantly more common among PD patients than healthy control subjects (χ2=4.23, df=1, p=0.04) (Figure 1); IgA NMDAR antibodies were not detected in any healthy control subject (Figure 1C). There was no association between NMDAR antibody positivity and age (t=−0.41, df=195, p=0.68).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody positivity among patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy control subjectsa

aA representative example from an NMDAR IgA-positive fixed cell-based assay is shown in panel A, and a nontransfected IgA control for the same representative sample is shown in panel B. Panel C illustrates the distribution of NMDAR antibody titer by isotype among patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy control subjects. IgA=immunoglobulin A; IgG=immunoglobulin G; IgM=immunoglobulin M.

No Demographic Differences Among the Patients With PD and NMDAR Antibody Positivity

No differences in age (t=0.39, df=106, p=0.69), gender (χ2=0.15, df=1, p=0.70), age at PD onset (t=0.51, df=106, p=0.61), or follow-up duration (t=−0.78, df=59, p=0.44) were observed between the patients with PD and NMDAR antibody positivity or negativity. There was also no difference in motor symptoms (t=0.13, df=81, p=0.89) or degree of disease progression (Hoehn and Yahr Scale) (Mann-Whitney U=0.12, p=0.93) based on antibody status (Table 2).

Cognitive Associations of NMDAR Antibody Positivity Among the Patients With PD

At baseline, there was no difference in MMSE scores based on antibody status (Mann-Whitney U=0.29, p=0.77). However, antibody status was a significant predictor of annual decline in MMSE scores in the linear regression analysis that was adjusted for age, sex, years of education, p-tau181, NfL, disease duration, and follow-up duration (adjusted R2=0.26, p=0.01). The mean annual decline in scores was 1.36±2.55 for the antibody-positive subgroup and 0.50±0.96 for the antibody-negative subgroup. During the course of the follow-up period, 13 patients with PD (21%) showed evidence of cognitive impairment (MMSE score <26); of these, 31% (N=4) were seropositive for NMDAR antibodies. For those followed longitudinally, 57% (N=4) of antibody-positive patients showed evidence of cognitive impairment at some time point in the course of the study compared with 17% (N=9) of antibody-negative patients (χ2=6.05, df=1, p=0.014) (Table 3).

TABLE 3. Longitudinal data stratified by antibody status for a subgroup of patients with Parkinson’s disease (N=61)a

VariableIgA or IgM NMDAR antibody positive (N=7)NMDAR antibody negative (N=54)Test statisticdfpb
N%N%
Cognitive impairment (MMSE score <26) during the study457917χ2=6.0510.014
Emergent psychosis during follow-up3431222χ2=1.4210.23
MeanSDMeanSD
Annual decline in MMSE score during follow-upc1.362.550.500.96U=–0.910.36
Change in HADS score during follow-upc9.48.66.26.0U=–0.930.35
Follow-up duration (years)4.22.03.61.7t=−0.78590.44

aHADS=Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IgA=immunoglobulin A; IgM=immunoglobulin M; MMSE=Mini-Mental State Examination; NMDAR=N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor.

bBold denotes statistical significance.

cVariable was compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test.

TABLE 3. Longitudinal data stratified by antibody status for a subgroup of patients with Parkinson’s disease (N=61)a

Enlarge table

Neuropsychiatric Outcomes With NMDAR Antibody Positivity Among the Patients With PD

During the course of the study, 37 (35%) patients with PD reported psychotic symptoms (psychosis at baseline, N=22; emergent psychosis during the follow-up period, N=15). There was no relationship between psychotic symptoms and NMDAR antibody status (χ2=0.31, df=1, p=0.58).

Baseline HADS scores showed high morbidity of depression and anxiety among the patients with PD (mean=10.4±7.41). Baseline HADS scores were not significantly different across the antibody-positive and antibody-negative subgroups (Mann-Whitney U=0.55, p=0.59). The mean change in the HADS score during the follow-up period was an increase of 6.56±6.34 points, and this was not significantly different in antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients with PD (Mann-Whitney U=−0.93, p=0.35).

Plasma NfL and p-tau181 Concentrations With NMDAR Antibody Positivity

The mean NfL concentration across all samples was 25.3±17.4 pg/mL. NfL concentrations were lower in samples from healthy control subjects than in samples from PD patients, but the difference was not significant (log NfL t=−0.74, df=141, p=0.46; see Table 1). Among the patients with PD, there was no association between NfL concentrations and antibody status in an age-adjusted linear regression analysis (R2=0.14, p=0.98). In the patients with PD, the mean plasma p-tau181 concentration was 2.32±1.36 pg/ml. There was no association between plasma p-tau181 levels and antibody status in the linear regression analysis that was adjusted for age (adjusted R2=0.10, p=0.32).

Discussion

In one of the first studies to investigate the possible longitudinal implications of NMDAR antibodies in neurodegenerative disease, we found increased frequencies of IgA NMDAR antibodies in patients with PD, and seropositive patients showed significantly greater cognitive impairment over time. More than one-half (57%) of all seropositive patients with PD were cognitively impaired during the study, while only 17% of seronegative patients showed evidence of cognitive impairment. Seropositive patients showed significantly greater annual cognitive decline irrespective of p-tau181 and NfL concentrations and other clinical and demographic variables. These findings suggest that any antibody-associated cognitive impairment occurs independent of these coexisting neurodegenerative processes.

NMDAR Antibody Isotype

When NMDAR antibodies are detected outside the context of encephalitis, they are primarily of the IgA and IgM isotypes. Consistent with previous studies, we detected only IgA and IgM antibodies, with IgA NMDAR antibodies found in patients with PD and not in healthy control subjects. There is some disagreement regarding the clinical relevance of IgA and IgM antibodies; while in vitro all NMDAR antibody isotypes have the potential to cause receptor internalization and dysfunction of glutamatergic signaling (2), a second study found a minority reacted with live neurons with no observed decrease in synaptic or extrasynaptic NMDARs (31). However, IgA antibodies have been implicated clinically with slowly progressive cognitive impairment that is reversible with immunotherapy (32). IgA NMDAR seropositivity has also been associated with cognitive dysfunction in a number of cancers, with impairments proportionate to antibody titer and the degree of blood-brain barrier disruption (3, 33). Similarly, in a case-control study of people at clinical high risk of psychosis, IgA NMDAR seropositivity was associated with significantly lower IQ and impaired performance on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (4). These impairments mirror the findings in our study, and therefore it seems possible that these antibody-associated effects are not specific to a particular disorder, with cognitive impairment observed across a range of clinical populations. However, it is also possible that the antibody-associated cognitive impairment represents a nonspecific factor, for example, indicative of patients who have a greater degree of inflammation, which could drive clinical outcomes.

NfL and p-tau181 Concentrations

Plasma NfL is a biomarker of neuroaxonal injury that is not specific for any one disease (17); plasma p-tau is an accurate marker of phosphorylated tau (18). We found that NfL concentrations did not significantly differ between patients with PD and healthy control subjects, which is consistent with previous studies showing no increase in NfL concentration in PD (34). Furthermore, we found no association between NfL or p-tau181 levels and NMDAR antibodies in the patients with PD, which suggests that these antibodies are present independent of the coexisting neurodegeneration and neuroaxonal injury in PD, consistent with the presence of NMDAR antibodies not being related to the degree of neurodegeneration in PD.

NMDAR antibodies are known to target the NR1 subunit of the receptor, causing internalization and reduction of NMDAR-mediated currents without causing cell death (35). However, in acute IgG-mediated NMDAR encephalitis, there is a significant increase in CSF NfL concentration, which suggests that there are pathological processes extending beyond the reversible internalization of NMDAR (19). If IgA or IgM NMDAR antibodies are exerting an effect in PD, these effects may more likely be restricted to the synapse and distinct from the inflammatory processes known to occur in IgG NMDAR encephalitis, and thus without axonal injury and subsequent increases in NfL levels (36). Indeed, chronic presence of serum NMDAR antibodies causes cognitive dysfunction, indicated by impairments in spatial working memory and novelty detection in otherwise healthy mice (37). Indeed, most passive immunization animal models of NMDAR encephalitis show impairments restricted to cognition, without the diverse symptomology and CNS inflammation associated with NMDAR encephalitis in humans (38). This is not unlike the modest cognitive impairments observed in the present study; it seems likely that if NMDAR antibodies do have a causative role in neurodegenerative disorders, then this role is restricted to the synapse and does not influence the additional inflammatory processes inherent to IgG-mediated NMDAR encephalitis (36, 38, 39).

Clinical Relevance in PD

While the etiology of PD remains to be elucidated, there is accumulating evidence that neuroinflammation plays a role early in the disease process (40). Up to 80% of people with PD develop dementia, but there is significant heterogeneity in the clinical course and time to develop symptoms. This heterogeneity likely reflects the interplay of many divergent biological factors, of which neuronal autoantibodies could be one. Several prognostic biomarkers have recently been identified as being associated with cognitive decline in PD, with MRI measures of cortical atrophy and CSF and blood biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology holding particular promise (41). Indeed, plasma p-tau181 is an accurate marker of phosphorylated tau associated with cognitive decline in neurodegenerative dementia (42, 43). By showing NMDAR antibodies to be associated with cognitive decline, independent of p-tau181, we hope to address concerns that the cognitive decline seen in patients with seropositive PD exclusively relates to other neurodegenerative processes in PD. Future studies could include a wider array of biomarkers to assess other pathologies implicated in cognitive impairment.

Limitations

There were several limitations to this cohort study. Some of the group sizes were small, primarily due to the 44% loss during the follow-up period and the small number of samples with detectable NMDAR antibodies. Furthermore, although efforts were made to match patients in the PD group and healthy control group according to age and gender, the limited availability of samples from healthy control subjects led to a significantly younger healthy control group than PD group. No association was found between NMDAR antibody positivity and age, and thus we do not believe that this age difference affects the overall validity of the results. We also adjusted for age in all regression models.

Not all patients were followed up for the same duration after inclusion in the study; therefore, to minimize missingness, annual decline in MMSE scores was calculated from the MMSE scores available throughout the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in follow-up durations between the seropositive and seronegative groups, making this an unlikely confounder, and follow-up duration was also included as a covariate in the regression model. The calculated annual decline in MMSE scores demonstrated a difference of almost 1 point between the antibody-positive and antibody-negative subgroups annually, but this difference did not reach statistical significance outside the regression model due to the small group sizes in this analysis.

We used the MMSE to assess cognition, which is known to be less sensitive than the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in PD. However, the MMSE and MoCA are equally sensitive in measuring cognitive change over time in PD, and therefore this should not affect the validity of our results (44). Psychosis, depression, and anxiety were assessed with the NMSS and HADS. While these scales provide a broad assessment of these symptoms, they do not comprehensively cover neuropsychiatric symptoms and are less detailed than other scales. In future studies, investigators could consider including the Neuropsychiatric Inventory or Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale in their assessments.

CSF samples were not routinely collected in this prospective longitudinal cohort study, and thus our analyses were restricted to plasma samples. However, while CSF analysis remains the gold standard for detection in autoimmune encephalitis, this does not negate the potential clinical relevance of NMDAR antibodies found in plasma. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that neuronal antibodies are not commonly found in the CSF of persons with dementia (10).

Conclusions

In this longitudinal cohort study, we found NMDAR antibody seropositivity to be associated with greater annual cognitive decline in patients with PD. Further investigation is needed to explore whether NMDAR antibodies have a causative role in the cognitive decline in PD, but the reversibility of immune-mediated mechanisms offers exciting potential for the development of therapeutic interventions.

Department of Old Age Psychiatry (Gibson, Hye, Aarsland) and Department of Psychosis Studies, Neuropsychiatry Research and Education Group (Pollak, Nicholson), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London; Neuroimmunology and CSF Laboratory, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London (Hart, Church, Lakdawala); Departments of Neuroinflammation (Hart) and Neurodegenerative Disease (Heslegrave, Zetterberg), Institute of Neurology, University College London; UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London (Heslegrave, Zetterberg); Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Parkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King‘s College Hospital and King‘s College London (Batzu, Rota, Trivedi, Chaudhuri); Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden (Zetterberg); Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway (Aarsland).
Send correspondence to Dr. Gibson ().

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, or Department of Health and Social Care.

Dr. Zetterberg has served on the scientific advisory boards of or as a consultant to AbbVie, Alector, Annexon, Artery, AZTherapies, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, NervGen, Passage Bio, Pinteon, Red Abbey Labs, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet, and Wave; he has lectured in symposia sponsored by AlzeCure, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, and Roche; and he is a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions. Dr. Chaudhuri serves on the advisory boards of AbbVie, Acadia, Bial, Britannia, Cynapsus, 4D, Global Kinetics, Lobsor, Medtronic, Profile, Roche, Scion, Stada, Sunovion, Theravance, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), and Zambon; he has received honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Britannia, Novartis, UCB, and Zambon; he has received research grant support for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, Bial, Britannia, GKC, and UCB; and he has received academic grant support from Horizon 2020, Innovative Medicines Initiative, Kirby Laing Foundation, Medical Research Council, NIHR, National Parkinson Foundation, Parkinson’s Disease Non-Motor Group, Parkinson’s UK, and Wellcome Trust. Dr. Aarsland has received research grant support or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Evonik, GE Healthcare, Lundbeck, and Novartis and has served as a paid consultant for Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Lundbeck, and Mentis Cura. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

This independent research was partly funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley, National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, and King’s College London. This work was also supported by a grant from King’s Health Partners. Dr. Gibson has received research grant support from an NIHR academic clinical fellowship and an Alzheimer’s Society fellowship. Dr. Pollak has received support for a clinical lectureship from NIHR. Dr. Hart has received research grant support from the University College London Hospitals, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. Dr. Zetterberg is a Wallenberg Scholar and has received research grant support from the Alzheimer’s Association and Alzheimer’s Disease Strategic Fund (grants ADSF-21–831376-C, ADSF-21–831381-C, and ADSF-21–831377-C); Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (grant 201809–2016862); Erling-Persson Family Foundation; European Research Council (grant 681712); European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement (grant 860197); European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders (grant JPND2021-00694); Olav Thon Foundation; Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor, Hjärnfonden, Sweden (grant FO2019-0228); Swedish Research Council (grant 2018–02532); Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (grant ALFGBG-720931); and UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London.

The authors thank the NIHR BioResource volunteers for their participation, as well as the NIHR BioResource centers, NHS trusts, and their staff for their contributions. The authors also thank NIHR, NHS Blood and Transplant, and Health Data Research UK.

REFERENCES

1. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al.: A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:391–404Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Castillo-Gómez E, Oliveira B, Tapken D, et al.: All naturally occurring autoantibodies against the NMDA receptor subunit NR1 have pathogenic potential irrespective of epitope and immunoglobulin class. Mol Psychiatry 2017; 22:1776–1784Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Bartels F, Strönisch T, Farmer K, et al.: Neuronal autoantibodies associated with cognitive impairment in melanoma patients. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:823–829Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Pollak TA, Kempton MJ, Iyegbe C, et al.: Clinical, cognitive and neuroanatomical associations of serum NMDAR autoantibodies in people at clinical high risk for psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:2590–2604Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Deutsch NR, Worthmann H, Steixner-Kumar AA, et al.: Autoantibodies against the NMDAR subunit NR1 are associated with neuropsychiatric outcome after ischemic stroke. Brain Behav Immun 2021; 96:73–79Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Westman G, Studahl M, Ahlm C, et al.: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor autoimmunity affects cognitive performance in herpes simplex encephalitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22:934–940Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Schou MB, Sæther SG, Drange OK, et al.: A prospective three-year follow-up study on the clinical significance of anti-neuronal antibodies in acute psychiatric disorders. Sci Rep 2019; 10:35Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8. Giannoccaro MP, Gastaldi M, Rizzo G, et al.: Antibodies to neuronal surface antigens in patients with a clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorder. Brain Behav Immun 2021; 96:106–112Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9. Busse S, Brix B, Kunschmann R, et al.: N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptor (NMDA-R) antibodies in mild cognitive impairment and dementias. Neurosci Res 2014; 85:58–64Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. Doss S, Wandinger KP, Hyman BT, et al.: High prevalence of NMDA receptor IgA/IgM antibodies in different dementia types. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2014; 1:822–832Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Gibson LL, McKeever A, Cullen AE, et al.: Neuronal surface autoantibodies in dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2021; 268:2769–2779Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12. Hely MA, Reid WGJ, Adena MA, et al.: The Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson’s Disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 2008; 23:837–844Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13. Smith C, Malek N, Grosset K, et al.: Neuropathology of dementia in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of autopsy studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:1234–1243MedlineGoogle Scholar

14. Tan EK, Chao YX, West A, et al.: Parkinson disease and the immune system: associations, mechanisms and therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:303–318Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15. Hopfner F, Müller SH, Steppat D, et al.: No association between Parkinson disease and autoantibodies against NMDA-type glutamate receptors. Transl Neurodegener 2019; 8:11Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16. Makuch M, Wilson R, Al-Diwani A, et al.: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibody production from germinal center reactions: therapeutic implications. Ann Neurol 2018; 83:553–561Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17. Barro C, Zetterberg H: Neurological symptoms and blood neurofilament light levels. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 144:13–20Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18. Lantero Rodriguez J, Karikari TK, Suárez-Calvet M, et al.: Plasma p-tau181 accurately predicts Alzheimer’s disease pathology at least 8 years prior to post-mortem and improves the clinical characterisation of cognitive decline. Acta Neuropathol 2020; 140:267–278Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19. Körtvelyessy P, Prüss H, Thurner L, et al.: Biomarkers of neurodegeneration in autoimmune-mediated encephalitis. Front Neurol 2018; 9:668Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20. Li J, Gu Y, An H, et al.: Cerebrospinal fluid light and heavy neurofilament level increased in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Brain Behav 2019; 9:e01354Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21. Aamodt WW, Waligorska T, Shen J, et al.: Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for cognitive decline in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord 2021; 36:2945–2950Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22. Batzu L, Rota S, Hye A, et al.: Plasma p-tau181, neurofilament light chain and association with cognition in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2022; 8:154Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23. Gonzalez MC, Ashton NJ, Gomes BF, et al.: Association of plasma p-tau181 and p-tau231 concentrations with cognitive decline in patients with probable dementia with Lewy bodies. JAMA Neurol 2022; 79:32–37Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24. Lees AJ, Hardy J, Revesz T: Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2009; 373:2055–2066Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD: Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967; 17:427–442Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26. Marinus J, Visser M, Stiggelbout AM, et al.: A short scale for the assessment of motor impairments and disabilities in Parkinson’s disease: the SPES/SCOPA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:388–395Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27. Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Brown RG, et al.: The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord 2007; 22:1901–1911Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

28. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67:361–370Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE: The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40:812Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30. Wandinger KP, Saschenbrecker S, Stoecker W, et al.: Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: a severe, multistage, treatable disorder presenting with psychosis. J Neuroimmunol 2011; 231:86–91Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

31. Hara M, Martinez-Hernandez E, Ariño H, et al.: Clinical and pathogenic significance of IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against the NMDA receptor. Neurology 2018; 90:e1386–e1394Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32. Prüss H, Höltje M, Maier N, et al.: IgA NMDA receptor antibodies are markers of synaptic immunity in slow cognitive impairment. Neurology 2012; 78:1743–1753Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33. Bartels F, Wandrey MM, Aigner A, et al.: Association between neuronal autoantibodies and cognitive impairment in patients with lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1302–1310Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

34. Hansson O, Janelidze S, Hall S, et al.: Blood-based NfL: a biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder. Neurology 2017; 88:930–937Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35. Moscato EH, Peng X, Jain A, et al.: Acute mechanisms underlying antibody effects in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Ann Neurol 2014; 76:108–119Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36. Mariotto S, Gajofatto A, Zuliani L, et al.: Serum and CSF neurofilament light chain levels in antibody-mediated encephalitis. J Neurol 2019; 266:1643–1648Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37. Yue W, Caldwell S, Risbrough V, et al.: Chronic presence of blood circulating anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies impairs cognitive function in mice. PloS One 2021; 16:e0256972Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38. Wilke JBH, Hindermann M, Berghoff SA, et al.: Autoantibodies against NMDA receptor 1 modify rather than cause encephalitis. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:7746–7759Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39. Jones BE, Tovar KR, Goehring A, et al.: Autoimmune receptor encephalitis in mice induced by active immunization with conformationally stabilized holoreceptors. Sci Transl Med 2019; 11:eaaw0044Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

40. Caggiu E, Arru G, Hosseini S, et al.: Inflammation, infectious triggers, and Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 2019; 10:122Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41. Aarsland D, Batzu L, Halliday GM, et al.: Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:47 (Erratum in: Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:53) Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

42. Moscoso A, Grothe MJ, Ashton NJ, et al.: Time course of phosphorylated-tau181 in blood across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Brain 2021; 144:325–339Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

43. Pascoal TA, Therriault J, Benedet AL, et al.: 18F-MK-6240 PET for early and late detection of neurofibrillary tangles. Brain 2020; 143:2818–2830Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

44. Biundo R, Weis L, Bostantjopoulou S, et al.: MMSE and MoCA in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies: a multicenter 1-year follow-up study. J Neural Transm 2016; 123:431–438Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar