The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
LetterFull Access

Anatomic Basis of Klüver-Bucy Syndrome

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.11.1.116

SIR: Classic Klüver-Bucy syndrome (KBS) has been considered a direct consequence of bilateral anterior temporal horn damage resulting from disease or injury.1,2 Hayman et al.3 recently described a case with MRI evidence of bilateral damage to the basolateral amygdala. Unfortunately, no autopsy was reported.

Currently, the clinician is required to document the clinical features of KBS (“psychic blindness,” hypersexuality, hyperorality, hypermetamorphosis, altered emotional behavior, and memory deficits) and to demonstrate the existence of a bilateral lesion in the anterior temporal horn or amygdala.2 Gloor4 has reported that lesions in the amygdala are not necessary for KBS in animals or humans. Brain imaging is frequently abnormal but not specific for lesions in these areas in cases of KBS.5

We have reported 2 cases exhibiting the clinical features of KBS (B.T. Carroll et al., unpublished). These cases lacked brain imaging evidence of bilateral damage to either the amygdala or the anterior temporal areas. However, KBS may still be present in such instances because of disruption of the limbic circuitry at the site of the mediodorsal thalamic relay.6

We applaud the efforts of Dr. Hayman and colleagues3 to further the understanding of the anatomic basis of KBS. We feel that the present approach may limit the study of KBS in that cases of KBS may be rejected for lack of the designated anatomic lesions.

There is some evidence to indicate that some of the clinical features of KBS may respond to carbamazepine treatment.7,8 In our 2 cases, antipsychotics were associated with clinical improvement. Management of KBS remains a challenging area. Treatment response to cases of KBS that lack the designated anatomic lesions may help to elucidate functional understanding of KBS.

References

1 Klüver H, Bucy PC: Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1939; 42:979–1000CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2 Lilly R, Cummings JL, Benson DF, et al: The human Klüver-Bucy syndrome. Neurology 1983; 33:1141–1145Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Hayman LA, Rexer JL, Pavol MA, et al: Klüver-Bucy syndrome after selective damage of the amygdala and its cortical connections. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10:354–358LinkGoogle Scholar

4 Gloor P: The Temporal Lobe and Limbic System. New York, Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar

5 Aichner F: Die Phenomenologie des nach Klüver und Bucy benannaten Syndroms beim Menshchen [Phenomenology of the Klüver-Bucy syndrome in man]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1984; 52:375–397Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Kalivas PW, Barnes CD, eds. Limbic Motor Circuits and Neuropsychiatry. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1993Google Scholar

7 Hooshmand H, Sepdham T, Vries JK: Klüver-Bucy syndrome: successful treatment with carbamazepine (letter). JAMA 1974; 229:1782Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Stewart JT: Carbamazepine treatment of a patient with Klüver-Bucy syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry 1985; 46:496–497MedlineGoogle Scholar