The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: Pathological gambling is defined by the DSM-IV-TR as a clinical condition characterized by persistent and maladaptive gambling behaviors; these are severe enough to disrupt the patient’s life and relationships and are not due to a manic episode. 1 Based on gambling behavior phenomenology, comorbid psychiatric conditions, family history, and demographics, it has been proposed that pathological gambling can present in three clinical subtypes: impulsive, obsessive-compulsive, and addictive. 2

Pathological gambling has been reported in association with dopamine agonists used in Parkinson’s disease, 3 restless legs syndrome, and endocrine disorders. The European Union Pharmacovigilance Working Party recommends that summaries of product characteristics for dopamine agonists carry a warning about pathological gambling as a side effect.

To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no published reports of pathological gambling associated with modafinil, and there have been no Yellow Card reports submitted to the U.K. Commission on Human Medicines.

Case Report

Mr. C was referred to the neuropsychiatry clinic at the age of 39 with a 12-year history of narcolepsy (HLA-DBQ1*0602 positive) and associated cataplexy. He had no significant medical or psychiatric history and was being treated with modafinil, 300 mg daily in two divided doses. Initially there was a good response, but a developing tolerance prompted the referral. The patient had a prior history of minor gambling but reported a 10-fold increase in his slot-machine use, spending £20,000–£30,000 a year, since commencing modafinil. The patient was hesitant to increase the dose in case his gambling habit worsened.

It was decided to withhold modafinil for a 2-month trial. At the next review, the patient complained of increased somnolence without the medication but reported that his gambling habit had considerably decreased. His somnolence had necessitated restarting modafinil, and his gambling had increased once again. He was started on clomipramine, 50 mg at night, with a view to titrating up to 150 mg/day to alleviate his compulsive behavior.

Eighteen months later, he was taking clomipramine, 40 mg at night, and had discontinued modafinil. He reported that he was no longer gambling.

Discussion

Modafinil is currently licensed in the United Kingdom for the symptomatic relief of excessive sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea, and moderate to severe chronic shift-work sleep disorder. Its use is also under study for cocaine dependence and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

In this patient, we observed a clear-cut temporal relationship between modafinil treatment and a gambling habit, with an improvement after withdrawal and worsening on rechallenge. The precise mechanism of action of modafinil is still unclear. 4 Modafinil is thought to increase wakefulness by blocking dopamine clearance through inhibition of the dopamine transporter and has been shown to increase cortical and caudate dopamine concentrations. 5

The effects of modafinil on impulsive/compulsive symptoms have been poorly investigated. A recent controlled study suggested that modafinil can have bidirectional effects on pathological gambling patients. Specifically, it has been shown to increase desire to gamble, disinhibition, and risky decision-making in low impulsivity subjects, while decreasing these indexes in high impulsivity subjects. 6 Overall, reward-seeking behavior, especially pathological gambling-compulsive/addictive subtype, may represent a possible adverse effect of modafinil via potentiation of the dopaminergic system in predisposed individuals.

University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK Department of Neuropsychiatry, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
References

1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, text revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000Google Scholar

2. Iancu I, Lowengrub K, Dembinsky Y, et al: Pathological gambling: an update on neuropathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs 2008; 22:123–138Google Scholar

3. Voon V, Hassan K, Zurowski M, et al: Prospective prevalence of pathologic gambling and medication association in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2006; 66:1750–1752Google Scholar

4. Ballon JS, Feifel D: A systematic review of modafinil: potential clinical uses and mechanisms of action. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67:554–566Google Scholar

5. Wisor JP, Eriksson KS: Dopaminergic-adrenergic interactions in the wake promoting mechanism of modafinil. Neuroscience 2005; 132:1027–1034Google Scholar

6. Zack M, Poulos CX: Effects of the atypical stimulant modafinil on a brief gambling episode in pathological gamblers with high vs. low impulsivity. J Psychopharmacol 2009; 23:660–671Google Scholar