The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
No Access

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant hyperthermia: end of a controversy?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.7.2.135

Two primary hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS): 1) that NMS is produced by abrupt and extensive central dopamine receptor blockade by neuroleptics, particularly in nigrostriatal and hypothalamic pathways; and 2) that NMS, like malignant hyperthermia (MH), results from a preexisting defect in skeletal muscle metabolism that is unmasked or provoked by neuroleptic exposure. To evaluate these models, the authors review studies published since 1980 of the clinical features, epidemiology, risk factors, laboratory assessment, and relevant animal models of NMS and MH. Data from these studies suggest that although NMS and MH are clinically similar, they are pharmacologically distinct, implying that cross-reactivity between triggering agents is unlikely to occur.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.