The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
EditorialFull Access

White Matter Disease and Psychiatric Dysfunction: Clinical and Neurobiological Insights

One of the most important tasks facing physicians and other health care providers is the making of an accurate diagnosis. In no discipline is this task more critical than in psychiatry, a specialty focused on the evaluation and treatment of conditions with especially challenging differential diagnostic considerations. This challenge is frequently compounded by the possibility that neurologic disease may be masquerading as a presumed psychiatric disorder. Clinicians evaluating such patients are no doubt familiar with the experience of questioning whether a patient’s presentation may in fact indicate a brain disease when schizophrenia or bipolar disorder seems more likely at first glance. Perhaps the best known—and arguably most worrisome—example of this situation is the discovery of a brain tumor producing psychiatric phenomenology with no other evidence of neurologic dysfunction (1).

The widespread availability of MRI in developed countries has allayed much concern about missing occult brain diseases, and failure to diagnose structural lesions is fortunately becoming less common. Yet MRI is not practicable in every case of psychiatric disturbance, and guidance is needed in how to apply this very sensitive technique to gain maximal diagnostic benefit. The review by Costei and colleagues (2) offers a useful guide to help organize thinking about this topic, focusing specifically on the uncommon but fascinating hereditary white matter diseases that can be difficult to recognize.

Hereditary leukoencephalopathies typically present in infancy and childhood with dramatic neurologic dysfunction and rapid progression, but they can also occur in adolescence or adulthood with a more insidious onset. Psychiatric dysfunction is a common presentation of several late-onset leukodystrophies, for example, and may precede neurologic features by many years. A familiar case in point is metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD), a central and peripheral dysmyelinative disease caused by a deficiency of the enzyme arylsulfatase A (3). Psychosis is a common feature of late-onset MLD, reported as present in 53% of adolescent and early adult-onset cases, and disrupted corticocortical and corticosubcortical connections, especially involving the frontal lobes, have been theorized as critical (4). Late-onset MLD has even been hypothesized as a naturally occurring model of schizophrenia (5). A variety of other hereditary white matter diseases may also present psychiatrically, and given the importance of accurate diagnosis to facilitate appropriate and timely treatment, consideration of these disorders is relevant for psychiatric clinicians.

From their review of the literature, Costei and colleagues found several clues to the diagnosis of a hereditary leukoencephalopathy that should prompt MRI scanning in patients with psychiatric symptoms and signs. These include the presence of drug-resistant symptoms, neurological and systemic features not expected with typical psychiatric disease, trigger events (such as traumatic brain injury, infection, and emotional distress), consanguinity, and a positive family history. The authors also provide an MRI algorithm for identifying hereditary white matter disorders in adults who present psychiatrically. This information will prove helpful for clinicians faced with the question of how to go about the evaluation of patients whose psychiatric presentations may be atypical.

In highlighting the association of genetic white matter disease with psychiatric disturbance, this work also raises the intriguing question of whether white matter dysfunction may be implicated in typical psychiatric disease. Since the advent of the MRI era that enabled regular identification of white matter disorders, a steady stream of reports and reviews has appeared on the hypothesis that disrupted white matter connectivity may underlie a wide range of psychiatric disorders that have otherwise defied neurobiological understanding, including schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, autism, and posttraumatic stress disorder (410). The appeal of this idea is that it may lead to an explanation of psychiatric illness that arises from distributed neural network dysfunction rather than focal cerebral lesions, distinct neuropathologjcal changes, or neurochemical alterations, but it remains conceptually difficult to explain the diverse panoply of psychiatric phenomenology by a simple nod to disconnectivity. Connectivity surely matters, but how does its breakdown produce psychiatric disturbance? Still, the notion that altered white matter connectivity leads to disturbed timing of impulse transmission and asynchronous cortical activity, and hence functional disruption of networks subserving emotional regulation (68), merits neurobiological attention.

In contrast to the readily observable neuropathology of hereditary white matter diseases, psychiatric diseases have been hypothesized to arise from more subtle changes in white matter, and substantial work in recent years has focused on glial cells. First and most obvious are oligodendrocytes, the central nervous system (CNS) glia responsible for myelinating axons (8, 9). Multiple genes influencing oligodendrocyte function have been implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, for example, and the subsequent dysfunction of these cells plausibly leads to the degraded integrity of multiple white matter tracts in affected patients (8, 9). More recently, as interest in inflammation as a mediator of many neuropsychiatric disorders has rapidly evolved, microglia have also been implicated in primary psychiatric diseases (10). Microglia, the resident immune cells of the CNS, are substantially more abundant in white matter than gray matter (11), and in schizophrenia, evidence exists to suggest that activated microglia contribute to oligodendrocyte dysfunction, hypomyelination, disrupted white matter integrity, and cerebral dysconnectivity (10).

To summarize, the review by Costei and colleagues adds to a steadily growing body of knowledge regarding the role of white matter in psychiatric illness. Their work has clear diagnostic implications for clinicians evaluating patients who present with psychiatric features. More broadly, the data from this and many other studies indicate that psychiatric disorders may arise de novo from disruption of myelinated tracts in the brain (410). This disruption may result from acquired damage to myelin and axons, and in parallel, evidence is expanding that implicates genetic abnormalities in glial cells required for normal myelination and network function. Given the lingering uncertainties in understanding the structural basis of psychiatric diseases, the possibility that acquired or genetic events affecting the brain white matter may lead to the clinical expression of psychiatric illness deserves further study. Adopting a leukocentric perspective may well result in additional insights disclosed by clinical and laboratory investigations of the myelinated tracts of the brain that are so often underappreciated.

Director, Behavioral Neurology Section, Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and Senior Scientific Advisor, Marcus Institute for Brain Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Send correspondence to Dr. Filley ().

Dr. Filley reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Filley CM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK: Neurobehavioral presentations of brain neoplasms. West J Med 1995; 163:19–25MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Costei C, Barbarosie M, Bernard G, et al.: Adult hereditary white matter diseases with psychiatric presentation: clinical pointers and MRI algorithm to guide the diagnostic process. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2021; 33:180–193AbstractGoogle Scholar

3 Austin J, Armstrong D, Fouch S, et al.: Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD). 8. MLD in adults; diagnosis and pathogenesis. Arch Neurol 1968; 18:225–240Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Hyde TM, Ziegler JC, Weinberger DR: Psychiatric disturbances in metachromatic leukodystrophy: insights into the neurobiology of psychosis. Arch Neurol 1992; 49:401–406Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Black DN, Taber KH, Hurley RA: Metachromatic leukodystrophy: a model for the study of psychosis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003; 15:289–293LinkGoogle Scholar

6 Walterfang M, Wood SJ, Velakoulis D, et al.: Diseases of white matter and schizophrenia-like psychosis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39:746–756Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Filley CM: White matter: beyond focal disconnection. Neurol Clin 2011; 29:81–97, viiiCrossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Haroutunian V, Katsel P, Roussos P, et al.: Myelination, oligodendrocytes, and serious mental illness. Glia 2014; 62:1856–1877Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Mighdoll MI, Tao R, Kleinman JE, et al.: Myelin, myelin-related disorders, and psychosis. Schizophr Res 2015; 161:85–93Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Dietz AG, Goldman SA, Nedergaard M: Glial cells in schizophrenia: a unified hypothesis. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7:272–281Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Mittelbronn M, Dietz K, Schluesener HJ, et al.: Local distribution of microglia in the normal adult human central nervous system differs by up to one order of magnitude. Acta Neuropathol 2001; 101:249–255Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar