The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Windows to the BrainFull Access

Extended Reality Technologies: Expanding Therapeutic Approaches for PTSD

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may develop after severe or prolonged life-threatening events, such as those caused by war, accidents, and other traumas (e.g., fires, assault, near-drowning) (12). Persons with PTSD often relive their traumatic event in flashbacks and/or nightmares (13, 14). Individuals with PTSD also may experience severe anxiety when exposed to scenarios reminiscent of the original trauma and often avoid anything (mentally or physically) that reminds them of the trauma they experienced (12). Additional symptoms of PTSD include persistent alertness and mental hyperarousal, insomnia, irritability, hypervigilance, and low concentration, as well as reckless and self-destructive behaviors (e.g., illicit drug use, risky sexual behaviors, deliberate self-harm) (1214). In PTSD, the trauma-related episodes are typically followed by distressing physiological responses that result in cognitive and behavioral avoidance, a coping mechanism aimed at reducing psychological distress and physiological hyperarousal (15). However, this avoidance only reinforces fear and thwarts adaptive processing of traumatic memories, thus perpetuating PTSD symptoms (15, 16).

Caring for persons with PTSD, particularly military servicemembers deployed during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, has created challenges for existing healthcare systems (1719). These challenges have recently been compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the need to adapt management approaches to mental health symptoms such as fear, anxiety, depression, avoidance, and PTSD to pandemic-related healthcare deliver constraints (20). Accordingly, there is a need for improved assessments and evidence-based treatments that effectively reduce PTSD-associated psychological distress and functional disability.

PSYCHOTHERAPY INTERVENTIONS FOR PTSD

Exposure therapy is an effective treatment for PTSD (16). Exposure therapy decreases PTSD symptoms through imaginal exposure (i.e., vividly imaging the feared object, situation, or activity) aimed at helping individuals overcome, rather than avoid, fear- and psychological distress-inducing stimuli (21, 22). In principle, imaginal exposure potentiates inhibitory learning processes and decreases the distress associated with traumatic memories by facilitating the development of adaptive associations with them, thereby rendering those memories harmless and tolerable (15).

Among other psychological treatments for PTSD are trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) interventions. These therapeutic approaches selectively target the memories, feelings, and thoughts of the traumatic events. Prolonged exposure (PE) and Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) are well recognized interventions among the TF-CBT treatments for PTSD (2224). PE is a specific form of TF-CBT that focuses on teaching patients to cope with their trauma-related memories, feelings, and situations by approaching them slowly but progressively (16). A recent study assessed exposure therapy sessions in 61 combat veterans of Iraq/Afghanistan and concluded that the PE group results demonstrated the most significant reductions in PTSD symptoms, as compared with cognitive processing therapy. That said, some patients either continue experiencing severe PTSD symptoms after receiving these treatments course or do not respond adequately to them (25). Thus, new therapies employing improved and advanced methodologies are needed.

EXTENDED REALITY (XR) FOR EXPOSURE THERAPIES

The advent of the XR platform (e.g., virtual reality [VR], augmented reality, and mixed reality) provides an alternative approach to traditional psychological interventions for the delivery and study of treatments for a wide range of mental health conditions, including PTSD (26). Extended reality is an emerging imaging paradigm in which users can experience varying levels of immersion, interaction and presence within the digital world (Figure 1A) (1, 27). It provides an innovative method for delivering exposure therapies (26).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. (A) Extended-reality (XR) platform elements. XR (i.e., virtual reality [VR], augmented reality [AR], and mixed reality [MR]) is an emerging imaging paradigm characterized by varying levels of a user’s immersion, interaction, and presence. Immersion refers to the sensation of physical existence within the extended reality environment, where a user is isolated from the real world. Interaction is described as the capacity to act and receive feedback within the digital environment. Presence appeals to the perception of connection to the artificial environment, evoking the illusion of being present within it (1, 2). (B) XR technology platform. In VR, the user experiences a full immersion into a non-natural digital world, facilitated by a head-mounted display (HMD) that provides sensory input (i.e., images, sound) (3). In AR, the user is partially immersed into an artificial environment but can interact with the real world, as well as with virtual elements in the digital world concurrently. Different from VR, an AR user can always experience his or her own reality in real-time (4). MR poses as a subclass of VR, combining real and virtual milieus along a “virtuality continuum,” seamlessly integrating real-world and artificial digital scenes with a superior level of connectivity and higher computer-user interactions (3, 5).

During a VR session, the user experiences a full immersion into a digital environment, the experience of which is facilitated by a head-mounted display (HMD) that provides sensory input (i.e., images, sound) (3). In augmented reality, the user is partially immersed into an artificial environment but can interact with the real world, as well as with virtual elements in the digital world concurrently (4). Mixed reality poses as a subclass of VR, combining real and virtual milieus along a “virtuality continuum,” seamlessly integrating real-world and artificial digital scenes with a superior level of connectivity and higher computer-user interactions (Figure 1B) (3, 5).

Several studies have demonstrated that VR exposure (VRE) therapy is different from a standard VR experience (i.e., amusement). VRE is a systematic psychotherapeutic immersion paradigm that uses multisensory VR to increase the patient’s experiential engagement during treatment sessions. It is an effective intervention for PTSD symptoms across varied populations, including combat soldiers after military trauma (12, 26, 2831). Virtual reality systems evoking multisensorial (auditory, visual, tactile, etc.) neural stimulation may hold the key for increasing the activation of trauma memory during exposure therapy (26, 32). Trauma-associated sensory elements such as image renderings, sounds, and even odor cues could suppress avoidance, assisting PTSD sufferers conquer their suppressed emotions and fear (15).

VRE trauma-relevant elements can mitigate avoidance by increasing emotional and sensory engagement (due to multisensorial activation), while reducing the probability of undesirable neural activation (33, 34). The periodic therapeutic activation of the trauma memory facilitates the conversion of new information to be encoded, while decreasing memory-associated anxiety and fear processes (35). Immersive XR paradigms can help individuals feel more comfortable facing stressful scenarios “virtually” rather than in real life, thereby learning new behaviors transferable to real world challenges (36). Another advantage is the added treatment-controlled conditions, where therapists can regulate the immersive experience during VRE therapy sessions (i.e., by adjusting intensity of exposure) (2).

In 2011, Reger et al. (28) reported results from a pilot study on the effectiveness of VRE treating PTSD in active-duty soldiers. Soldiers treated with VRE immersion therapies reported a statistically significant decrease in PTSD symptoms. The role of VRE in increasing emotional engagement and reducing avoidance was demonstrated in an elegant study by Costanzo et al. (37). The results from this investigation indicated that experiencing a standardized combat-related VR immersion heightened arousal in recently returning combat-exposed service members with PTSD compared with combat-exposed service members without PTSD. More recently, a study by Katz et al. (38) indicated that VRE engagement is linked to higher physiological habituation to trauma-relevant stimuli, compared with habituation in the standard PE condition. Taken together, these findings add to the growing body of evidence validating the concept of VRE therapies as interventional methodologies with potentially higher engagement attributes compared with traditional exposure therapies (34). The exact neurophysiological mechanisms by which VRE mitigates avoidance in PTSD are not clearly understood. However, an interesting concept to consider is whether lowering the symptom of avoidance using virtual immersion could be a predictor for reduction in reexperiencing symptoms. Engaging in VRE experiences may potentiate further emotional processing, thus hampering (or lowering) the reexperiencing of and the reactivity to trauma-related memories (34).

MULTISENSORIAL ELEMENTS OF XR

XR technologies, including VR represent a versatile and innovative cybernetic platform with significant applicability to the clinical neurosciences. Concurrent with these medical and technological advances, clinical VR, a category of virtual interventions fosters innovative mental health procedures and new therapeutic interventions applicable at varied clinical fields including discipline-specific (i.e., medicine, psychology), and expanding to interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary levels (3949). XR treatments provide higher levels of immersion, interaction, and presence. While all of these are important elements of this treatment approach, increased immersion (i.e., profound cognitive involvement in which a user is isolated from the real world) and presence (i.e., evoking the illusion of being present) have been linked to efficacy of VRE, including both improved clinical outcomes and also sustained effects over time (Figure 2A) (2).

FIGURE 2 AND COVER.

FIGURE 2 AND COVER. (A) Virtual reality exposure (VRE) response. Extended-reality (XR)-supported treatments posit interesting hallmarks, involving varying levels of immersion, interaction, and presence. Altogether, these are very important elements, but particularly the increased immersion and presence have been linked to higher response in VRE, along with improved clinical outcomes and sustained advances during posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment (2). (B) VRE-odor integration. The neurophysiological mechanisms for olfactory processing in the brain is linked to PTSD neural pathways (amygdaloid-hippocampal complex and orbitofrontal cortex), the same neuroanatomical circuits regulating emotions and emotionally-evoked memories (69). Odor-evoking VRE environments further increase the elements of immersion and presence, offering a higher real world-like experience than VRE without scents (10).

Human interactions in the real-world environment are naturally multisensorial (i.e., stimulating the senses of touch, sight, hearing, smell and taste simultaneously) (11). Generating a multisensorial virtual paradigm is an essential requisite in the rendering of an immersive replica of the real world (6). To date, most VR experiences (i.e., entertainment, tourism, marketing) primarily stimulate the audiovisual centers (6, 11, 50). In the clinical domain, VRE treatment has predominantly focused on the visual and auditory senses (6). However, some authors have argued the need for olfactory integration into VRE for the treatment of PTSD (6, 7, 51). The mediation of olfactory memories is processed within the orbitofrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus (8). These neuroanatomical structures are also implicated in learning and memory and constitute a foundational circuitry for PTSD (7).

The amygdala performs a pivotal function in sensory integration of olfactory stimuli (i.e., odor-induced fear) (7, 52). Coupling of a neutral (i.e., conditioned) stimulus to a fear-evoking (i.e., unconditioned) stimulus, inducing fear responses to the conditioned stimulus by itself, has served in probing the amygdala’s role in odor-induced fear behaviors (52). In addition, other limbic structures such as the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis have been implicated in odor-evoked fear (53). A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that VRE incorporating trauma-related odors, such as flammable gas (e.g., diesel), added to the mainstream visual and auditory stimuli, was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in active duty military personnel (54).

In humans, the physiologic mechanisms involved in aromatic processing is commonly emotional and visceral. Odor-evoked memories are more emotionally robust than memories triggered by other sensory stimuli (i.e., visual, auditory) (5557). More importantly, the neurophysiological processing of odors in the brain is linked to PTSD neural pathways (amygdaloid-hippocampal complex and orbitofrontal cortex), the same neuroanatomical circuits regulating emotions, emotionally-evoked memories and related associations (69). An interesting study conducted by Munyan et al. (10) indicated that odor-evoking VRE environments further increase the elements of immersion and presence, offering a higher real-world-like experience than VRE without scents (Figure 2B). The advances in technology and the innovation of today’s HMDs support the capabilities to stimulate all five senses (Figure 3) (11). Olfactory stimulation can be achieved with “olfactory HMDs” that release a variety of scents or odorant combinations (58, 59). An exemplary VRE study on combat-related PTSD (Iraq), utilized universal serial box (USB) olfactory display add-on gear capable of releasing eight different scents associated with the Iraq War. Odorants were disseminated to the participants using fans and a small air compressor. Positive outcomes were reported, including significant reduction of PTSD symptoms (47).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3. Multisensory head-mounted displays (HMDs). The advances in technology and the innovation of today’s HMDs support the capabilities to stimulate all five human senses (touch, hearing, vision, smell, and taste) (11). Generating a multisensorial digital paradigm is an essential requisite in the rendering of an immersive replica of the real world (6).

All images created under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Created with VH Dissector and BioRender.com.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND ACCESSIBILITY

Unequivocally, XR innovations have advanced significantly during the last decades, with improved add-on technologies, more affordable devices, and further realistic software. These improvements are making it possible for XR systems and their components (HMDs, controllers, eye-tracking devices, etc.) to reach a wide-range of multidisciplinary users, including healthcare providers and patients (1). From a clinical and research standpoint, immersive virtual environments can be highly controllable spaces that facilitate research studies and clinical interventions, considering that almost every element of the virtual milieu can be regulated (18). Furthermore, artificial virtual environments are particularly nimble, allowing the necessary adjustments following the adaptation processes as determined by the user’s specific cognitive, emotional and neurophysiological nuances (60).

Nonetheless, XR technologies still have some drawbacks that pose important clinical restrictions that arise when considering the costs of the devices, such as hardware and software. Another limitation is the need for specialized technology skills and medical training to create and deliver clinically safe immersive experiences and to operate the XR system components (i.e., software, HMD, hand-controllers), as well as the potential side effects, such as cybersickness (48, 61). XR-based therapeutic approaches should not be envisioned to become automated interventions for self-administration. On contrary, they require well trained clinicians to assure the appropriate care is provided, considering their intricacy and potential impact on behavioral health conditions (18). XR hardware designs have additional limitations (i.e., most HMD lenses are either bulky and heavy, wired-tethered to computer systems, or have limited battery endurance) (62). However, XR technology is rapidly advancing: performance of devices is exponentially improving, thus providing seamless immersions, improved human-machine integration, and more highly adaptive interactions (63). In addition, the cost of HMDs and other XR devices is constantly decreasing as the popular demand and medical usage increase (64).

In addition, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health is engaging in medical XR regulatory science research. The medical XR program is one of 20 research lineups established to warrant patient access to innovative XR-based devices that are effective and safe. This program is intended to reduce the gap between XR technologies (e.g., design, development, evaluation) and their clinical integration. Government and other agencies are fostering a scientific culture in support of regulatory requirements and decisions on the technologies governing medical XR devices (64).

CONCLUSIONS

PTSD is a highly distressing disorder characterized by extremely upsetting thoughts and intrusive traumatic memories. Experimentally, VRE immersion has proven to be effective as a therapeutic intervention by reducing the symptoms of PTSD across varied populations, including veterans. The therapeutic attributes of XR innovation rely on its immersive potential, capable of recreating real-world experiences at a digital multisensorial level, and integrating a seamless human-computer interface. Although XR technology is hastily advancing, it is not yet mainstream. Therefore, it is imperative to continue the technological advances, accompanied with XR system cost reductions to support the accessibility of these systems, and target a wider range of neuropsychiatric disorders.

The emotional distress among the returning troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the PTSD resulting from living through the COVID-19 pandemic, is anticipated to generate additional mental health challenges in the coming years. To address these imminent needs, clinical VR technology research advances and VRE therapies may be considered suitable medical interventions.

The Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, and the Research and Academic Affairs Service Line, W.G. Hefner Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, N.C. (López-Ojeda, Hurley); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (López-Ojeda); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hurley); and the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Hurley).
Send correspondence to Dr. Hurley ().

This research was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 6 Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center.

References

1 Yeung AWK, Tosevska A, Klager E, et al.: Virtual and augmented reality applications in medicine: analysis of the scientific literature. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25499Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Mitrousia V, Giotakos O: Virtual reality therapy in anxiety disorders. Psychiatriki 2016; 27:276–286Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Milgram P, Kishino F: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. 1994. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231514051_A_Taxonomy_of_Mixed_Reality_Visual_DisplaysGoogle Scholar

4 Eckert M, Volmerg JS, Friedrich CM: Augmented reality in medicine: systematic and bibliographic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e10967Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Bray B, Qian W: What is mixed reality? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/discover/mixed-realityGoogle Scholar

6 S Herz R: Olfactory virtual reality: a new frontier in the treatment and prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder. Brain Sci 2021; 11:1070Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Daniels JK, Vermetten E: Odor-induced recall of emotional memories in PTSD-review and new paradigm for research. Exp Neurol 2016; 284(Pt B):168–180Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Mtui E, Gruener G, Dockery P: Olfactory and limbic systems, in Fitzgerald’s Clinical Neuroanatomy and Neuroscience, 8th ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2021, pp 346–367Google Scholar

9 Etkin A, Wager TD: Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:1476–1488Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Munyan BG 3rd, Neer SM, Beidel DC, et al.: Olfactory stimuli increase presence in virtual environments. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157568Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S, Orús C: The influence of scent on virtual reality experiences: the role of aroma-content congruence. J Bus Res 2021; 123:289–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar

12 American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2013Google Scholar

13 Jensen BS, Andersen N, Petersen J, et al.: Enhanced mental health with virtual reality mental hygiene by a veteran suffering from PTSD. Case Rep Psychiatry 2021; 2021:5576233MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Liberzon I, Sripada CS: The functional neuroanatomy of PTSD: a critical review. Prog Brain Res 2008; 167:151–169Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Gramlich MA, Smolenski DJ, Norr AM, et al.: Psychophysiology during exposure to trauma memories: Comparative effects of virtual reality and imaginal exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress Anxiety 2021; 38:626–638Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 American Psychological Association: Prolonged exposure. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/ptsd-guideline/treatments/prolonged-exposureGoogle Scholar

17 Fischer H: U.S. military casualty statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA590694Google Scholar

18 Rizzo A, Parsons TD, Lange B, et al.: Virtual reality goes to war: a brief review of the future of military behavioral healthcare. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2011; 18:176–187Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19 Seal KH, Bertenthal D, Miner CR, et al.: Bringing the war back home: mental health disorders among 103,788 US veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan seen at Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:476–482Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Namdar P, Mojabi NA, Mojabi B: Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurophysiology (Online ahead of print, August 12, 2021) doi: 10.1007/s11062-021-09903-7Google Scholar

21 Foa E, Hembree EA, Rothbaum BO, et al.: Prolonged exposure therapy for PTSD: emotional processing of traumatic experiences–therapist guide. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordclinicalpsych.com/view/10.1093/med-psych/9780190926939.001.0001/med-9780190926939Google Scholar

22 American Psychological Association: Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 2017. http://doi.apa.org/get-pe-doi.cfm?doi=10.1037/e501872017-001Google Scholar

23 Watkins LE, Sprang KR, Rothbaum BO: Treating PTSD: a review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions. Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12:258Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense: VA/DOD clinical practice guideline for the management of posttraumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense. https://www.guidelinecentral.com/summaries/vadod-clinical-practice-guideline-for-the-management-of-posttraumatic-stress-disorder-and-acute-stress-disorderGoogle Scholar

25 Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Hoge CW, et al.: Psychotherapy for military-related PTSD: a review of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2015; 314:489–500Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26 Difede J, Cukor J, Wyka K, et al.: D-cycloserine augmentation of exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39:1052–1058Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27 Ong T, Wilczewski H, Paige SR, et al.: Extended reality for enhanced telehealth during and beyond COVID-19: viewpoint. JMIR Serious Games 2021; 9:e26520Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

28 Reger GM, Holloway KM, Candy C, et al.: Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy for active duty soldiers in a military mental health clinic. J Trauma Stress 2011; 24:93–96Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29 Rizzo A, Reger G, Perlman K, et al.: Virtual reality posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exposure therapy results with active duty OIF/OEF service members. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2011; 10:301–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar

30 Rizzo A, Shilling R: Clinical Virtual Reality tools to advance the prevention, assessment, and treatment of PTSD. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2017; 8(sup5):1414560Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

31 Rothbaum BO, Price M, Jovanovic T, et al.: A randomized, double-blind evaluation of D-cycloserine or alprazolam combined with virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 171:640–648Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32 Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Kooper R, et al.: Effectiveness of computer-generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:626–628Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33 Reger GM, Smolenski D, Norr A, et al.: Does virtual reality increase emotional engagement during exposure for PTSD? subjective distress during prolonged and virtual reality exposure therapy. J Anxiety Disord 2019; 61:75–81Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

34 Stevens ES, Bourassa KJ, Norr AM, et al.: Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom cluster structure in prolonged exposure therapy and virtual reality exposure. J Trauma Stress 2021; 34:287–297Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35 Jaycox LH, Zoellner L, Foa EB: Cognitive-behavior therapy for PTSD in rape survivors. J Clin Psychol 2002; 58:891–906Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36 Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, et al.: Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med 2017; 47:2393–2400Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37 Costanzo ME, Leaman S, Jovanovic T, et al.: Psychophysiological response to virtual reality and subthreshold posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in recently deployed military. Psychosom Med 2014; 76:670–677Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38 Katz AC, Norr AM, Buck B, et al.: Changes in physiological reactivity in response to the trauma memory during prolonged exposure and virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Trauma 2020; 12:756–764Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39 Rizzo AA, Schultheis M, Kerns KA, et al.: Analysis of assets for virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004; 14:207–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar

40 Parsons TD, Rizzo AA: Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2008; 39:250–261Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41 Powers MB, Emmelkamp PMG: Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 2008; 22:561–569Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

42 Rizzo AS, Difede J, Rothbaum BO, et al.: Development and early evaluation of the Virtual Iraq/Afghanistan exposure therapy system for combat-related PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1208:114–125Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

43 Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA: Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005; 8:241–262, discussion 263–271Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

44 Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Ready D, et al.: Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62:617–622Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

45 Rothbaum BO, Rizzo AS, Difede J: Virtual reality exposure therapy for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1208:126–132Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

46 Yuen ASY, Mak WWS: The effects of immersive virtual reality in reducing public stigma of mental illness in the university population of Hong Kong: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e23683Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

47 Pair J, Allen B, Dautricourt M, et al.: A virtual reality exposure therapy application for Iraq War Post traumatic stress disorder, in IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 2006, pp 67–72Google Scholar

48 López-Ojeda W, Hurley RA: Extended-reality technologies: an overview of emerging applications in medical education and clinical care. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2021; 33:A4–A177LinkGoogle Scholar

49 Pandita S, Won AS: Chapter 7–clinical applications of virtual reality in patient-centered care:http://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/B9780128169582000071?token=949D5C4A90DBEF7095CC7EB81C3E5FBDA6BED66445E8581E891201868E8CDFA22EC1ADED196164147F89AE46208A6ADC&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211109160110Google Scholar

50 Guttentag DA: Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tour Manage 2010; 31:637–651CrossrefGoogle Scholar

51 Aiken MP, Berry MJ: Posttraumatic stress disorder: possibilities for olfaction and virtual reality exposure therapy. Virtual Real (Walth Cross) 2015; 19:95–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar

52 Pitman RK, Rasmusson AM, Koenen KC, et al.: Biological studies of post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012; 13:769–787Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

53 Rosen JB: The neurobiology of conditioned and unconditioned fear: a neurobehavioral system analysis of the amygdala. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004; 3:23–41Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

54 Beidel DC, Frueh BC, Neer SM, et al.: Trauma management therapy with virtual-reality augmented exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD: a randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord 2019; 61:64–74Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

55 Herz RS, Schooler JW: A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: testing the Proustian hypothesis. Am J Psychol 2002; 115:21–32Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

56 Larsson M, Willander J, Karlsson K, et al.: Olfactory LOVER: behavioral and neural correlates of autobiographical odor memory. Front Psychol 2014; 5:312Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

57 Herz RS: A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli. Chem Senses 2004; 29:217–224Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

58 Gutierrez M, Vexo F, Thalmann D: Stepping into Virtual Reality. Berlin, Springer Science & Business Media, 2008CrossrefGoogle Scholar

59 Washburn DA, Jones LM: Could olfactory displays improve data visualization? Comput Sci Eng 2004; 6:80–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar

60 Patrikelis P, Konstantakopoulos G, Messinis L, et al.: Adaptive immersive virtual environments as a treatment for depersonalization disorder. Psychiatr 2021; 1–15Google Scholar

61 Park MJ, Kim DJ, Lee U, et al.: A literature overview of virtual reality (VR) in treatment of psychiatric disorders: recent advances and limitations. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:505Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

62 Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K, et al.: Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4:454Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

63 Andrews C, Southworth MK, Silva JNA, et al.: Extended reality in medical practice. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2019; 21:18Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

64 U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Medical extended reality program: research on medical extended reality-based medical devices. Silver Spring, Md., U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-regulatory-science-research-programs-conducted-osel/medical-extended-reality-program-research-medical-extended-reality-based-medical-devicesGoogle Scholar