The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Neuropsychiatric Practice and OpinionFull Access

Introduction

Published Online:

In this issue we present an exchange of views arising from the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for delusions. Anchoring the discussion is an article by Drs. Mujica-Parodi and Sackeim in which they examine the DSM-IV requirement that to be classified as a delusion, a belief must be discordant with beliefs ordinarily accepted by the patient's culture or subculture. They propose that an information-processing model would avoid what they regard as the relativism and ambiguity of this DSM-IV criterion. Drs. Cutting and Fabrega critique the model and reflect further on the diagnosis of delusions, and the authors reply.